Listen to the article
In the shadow of Israel’s military actions against Iran, a complex information war is playing out across Persian-language media and social networks. This struggle for narrative control has created a deeply polarized environment that makes it increasingly difficult for Iranians to find common ground amid escalating tensions.
On one side, Persian media outlets aligned with Reza Pahlavi, the crown prince of Iran’s former royal family, present a narrative of imminent regime change. Pahlavi himself has issued rallying cries through social media, declaring: “The future is bright, and we will pass this sharp turn in history together. Now is the time to rise; it is time to take back Iran.”
The opposing side, controlled by Islamic Republic media, promotes triumphant imagery of Iranian missiles striking “Zionist cult strongholds” in what they describe as an inevitable Iranian victory against Israel.
This information battle has been intensifying for years, funded by various state actors and political groups. Israeli and pro-Israeli organizations have been particularly active in pushing their narratives directly to Iranian audiences through satellite television channels and social media platforms. These efforts have strategically co-opted the legitimate grievances expressed during Iran’s 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom movement, reframing them to support Israel’s military actions.
Iran International, a Persian-language satellite network reportedly funded by Saudi interests but promoting pro-Israeli viewpoints, has been at the forefront of this media campaign. Working alongside U.S. and Israeli political figures and numerous social media influencers, they present the Israeli government as a liberator for Iranian women, while supporting the crown prince’s leadership ambitions.
The symbolism in Israel’s military operation is telling. Dubbed “Rising Lion,” it deliberately evokes a powerful Persian symbol that adorned Iran’s flag during the pre-revolution Pahlavi era. Social media is now flooded with memes showing lions draped in Israeli flags coming to Iran’s rescue, or lions representing Israel and pre-revolutionary Iran standing united.
These propaganda efforts have systematically targeted Western experts who offer nuanced reporting on Iran, many of whom are women. The messaging creates a stark binary: you either support regime change or you’re an apologist for the Islamic Republic. One such initiative, Iran Disinfo, received funding from the Trump administration’s State Department before being shut down in 2020 following revelations that it was using government funds to attack American journalists.
For Iranians within the country, this situation is further complicated by the Islamic Republic’s long-standing restrictions on free press. With limited access to reliable information domestically, many citizens turn to external sources, making them vulnerable to disinformation campaigns.
The Islamic Republic’s credibility has been deteriorating for decades. State television and radio have functioned as propaganda tools since 1979, frequently broadcasting fabricated narratives during moments of civil unrest like the 2009 Green Movement and the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom uprising. Some state TV reporters have even earned the notorious label of “interrogator-reporters” for their role in broadcasting forced confessions to support government narratives.
Yet as the reality of Israeli bombs falling on Iranian soil becomes impossible to ignore, cracks are appearing in these polarized narratives. Even prominent opposition figures like Masih Alinejad, known for her women’s rights advocacy and connections to Washington hawks, have begun to criticize Netanyahu’s approach. After initially reposting Israeli evacuation orders, Alinejad pivoted to publish a stern rebuke to the Israeli prime minister, warning: “Do not kill the people of Iran fighting for their freedom!”
Netanyahu himself seemed surprised by the lack of Iranian public support, making a direct appeal for Iranians to “stand up and make your voices heard” while awkwardly adopting the slogan “Woman, life, freedom” in both English and Persian. The response on Iranian social media was swift, with users sharing an image of a woman in Berlin holding a sign reading: “Don’t ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ us, you murderer!”
For many Iranians, the current situation presents an impossible dilemma. While some initially celebrated strikes against Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders who had brutally suppressed the 2022 protests, the escalating bombardment of civilian infrastructure has shifted public sentiment. As one Tehran resident put it: “It’s hard to say whom we hate more right now, Khamenei or Netanyahu.”
Even as Iranians continue their decades-long struggle for democratic governance, they fear being robbed of self-determination by external forces. A powerful sentiment emerging across Iranian social media echoes the words of rapper Toomaj Salehi, whose music became a rallying cry during recent protests: “The enemy of my enemy is not my friend.”
Across political divides, a consensus appears to be forming among Iranians both inside and outside the country: “War is not the answer.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


15 Comments
This propaganda battle highlights the high stakes involved. Both sides are vying for control of the narrative, potentially putting Iranians in the middle. I hope that somehow, amidst all the noise, a path towards de-escalation and diplomacy can emerge.
This propaganda battle is deeply concerning. The involvement of various state actors and the conflicting narratives are making it increasingly difficult for Iranians to get a clear picture of the situation. I hope they can find ways to come together and seek common ground.
The propaganda surge is worrying, as it seems to be further dividing Iranians. It’s concerning to see how state actors and political groups are trying to control the narrative and sway public opinion. I hope that somehow, amidst all the noise, a path towards de-escalation and diplomacy can emerge.
The intensity of the information war is striking. It’s troubling to see how state actors and political groups are working to shape the narrative and sway public opinion. I wonder how this is impacting the average Iranian’s ability to make informed decisions.
The propaganda battle is troubling, as it seems to be driving Iranians further apart. I wonder how the average citizen is coping with the conflicting narratives and the high stakes involved. It’s crucial that they find ways to come together and seek common ground.
This propaganda surge is deeply concerning. The competing narratives and the involvement of various state actors make it increasingly difficult for Iranians to find reliable information and common ground. I hope they can navigate this complex landscape and find a path forward.
This propaganda surge is a worrying sign. It’s concerning to see how state actors and political groups are trying to control the narrative and sway public opinion. I hope that Iranians can find ways to cut through the noise and have open, honest dialogues.
This conflict of narratives is deeply concerning. Ordinary Iranians must be feeling increasingly isolated and unsure of what to believe. I hope they can find ways to come together and find common ground, rather than be further divided by this propaganda war.
The intensity of the information war is striking. It’s troubling to see how the competing narratives are making it harder for Iranians to find common ground and work towards a peaceful resolution. I hope they can navigate this complex landscape and find a way forward.
Interesting to see the information war playing out between Iran’s different factions. It highlights the complexity of the situation and the challenge of finding common ground. I wonder how ordinary Iranians are navigating these conflicting narratives.
The information war is a concerning development, as it can make it harder for Iranians to find reliable information and common ground. I hope that despite the propaganda, they can navigate this complex landscape and work towards a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
This propaganda battle highlights the high stakes involved. Both sides are vying for control of the narrative, potentially putting Iranians in the middle. I wonder how the average citizen is coping with the conflicting claims and the uncertainty of the situation.
The information war is a concerning development, as it can make it harder for Iranians to get a clear picture of the situation. I hope that despite the propaganda, they can find ways to unite and work towards a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
The propaganda battle is intense, with both sides trying to control the narrative. It’s concerning to see how state actors and political groups are funding and pushing their agendas through various media channels. Impartiality and objectivity seem to be in short supply.
The propaganda surge is worrying, as it makes it harder for Iranians to get a clear picture of the situation. I wonder how the average Iranian is navigating this complex information landscape and trying to make sense of the conflicting claims.