Listen to the article
The Trump administration has intensified punitive measures against Iraq, aiming to force the disbandment of Iranian-backed militias following repeated attacks on U.S. personnel and facilities. These measures include halting U.S. dollar shipments to Baghdad, a significant escalation in diplomatic pressure amid ongoing regional tensions.
As part of this economic leverage, the administration has reportedly blocked a cargo-plane delivery of nearly $500 million in U.S. banknotes, representing proceeds from Iraqi oil sales held in Federal Reserve Bank of New York accounts. According to The Wall Street Journal, this marks the second such blocked delivery since the start of the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran in late February.
A State Department spokesperson emphasized the administration’s position, telling Fox News Digital: “The United States has consistently been clear we will take all measures to counter Iran’s destabilizing activities in Iraq, protect U.S. interests against Iran-aligned terrorist militias in Iraq, and make clear our concerns about the Iraqi government’s failure to prevent this terrorism.”
The administration’s focus is on dismantling the Popular Mobilization Force (PMF), an umbrella organization of militias largely loyal to Iran. These groups have launched attacks not only against U.S. assets but also against Iraqi Kurds, who remain crucial American allies in the Middle East.
Beyond financial restrictions, the U.S. has also suspended security cooperation programs with Iraq’s military, signaling a comprehensive approach to pressuring Baghdad into action against these Iran-backed groups.
Iraqi officials have pushed back against this pressure, with one telling Fox News Digital that addressing armed factions requires “careful and gradual approaches” due to the complex political, security and social dimensions involved. The official noted that some of these factions hold significant political and popular influence within Iraq.
“External measures that fail to take into account the particularities of this reality may lead to counterproductive outcomes and negatively affect internal balances, which would not serve the stability efforts undertaken by Iraq and its partners, foremost among them Washington,” the Iraqi official added.
A senior Kurdish official supported Washington’s more assertive approach, telling Fox News Digital: “The dollar pause is part of the nuclear option in the Treasury Department, and the Americans have always been reluctant to leverage it. The Iraqis, meanwhile, have been cruel to their partners — Americans and the KRG [Kurdish Regional Government], as this war has shown — and now Washington is drawing a red line.”
The timing of these measures is particularly significant as Iraq approaches the selection of a new prime minister. The Trump administration has explicitly opposed the return of former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki due to his close ties with Tehran.
“In the end, though, it’s still the Shia house that chooses the premiership. They have some latitude, but ultimately, they will select a candidate acceptable to both Iran and the United States,” the Kurdish official explained. “This time, however, Washington appears intent on influencing the outcome rather than just observing it.”
The economic pressure carries substantial weight because Iraq’s economy depends heavily on oil revenues, which are processed through the U.S. financial system. By controlling access to these funds, Washington can exert considerable influence over Iraqi politics and security policies.
Entifadh Qanbar, a former spokesman for Iraq’s deputy prime minister, warned about the imminent dangers posed by the PMF to American interests, noting that the Iraqi government provides these groups with state identification cards, vehicles, and official government license plates. This enables them to enter Baghdad’s high-security Green Zone and potentially threaten the U.S. Embassy or other institutions.
Underscoring the severity of the threat, the U.S. Department of Justice recently announced a $10 million bounty for information on the leader of the pro-Iranian militia Harakat Ansar Allah al-Awfiya (HAAA), which has been involved in attacks across Iraq, including an April 8 ambush of U.S. diplomats near Baghdad International Airport.
As tensions escalate, the Biden administration’s approach marks a significant shift in U.S.-Iraq relations, leveraging economic and security cooperation as tools to influence Baghdad’s stance toward Iranian proxies operating within its borders.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
This is a high-stakes game of geopolitical tug-of-war, with Iraq caught in the middle. The US is clearly willing to use its economic leverage to try to shape events, but it’s a risky move that could further destabilize the region. Curious to see how this plays out.
Interesting to see the US take such a confrontational approach with Iraq over the Iran-backed militias. Blocking cash transfers is a significant escalation – I wonder if it will force the Iraqi government’s hand or just deepen the rift between Baghdad and Washington.
The Trump administration seems determined to counter Iran’s regional influence, even if it means escalating tensions with Iraq. Blocking cash transfers is a bold move, but I worry it could backfire if the Iraqi government feels its sovereignty is being violated. Diplomatic finesse will be crucial here.
The US-Iran tensions are really heating up, with Iraq caught in the middle. Blocking cash transfers is a bold move, but I worry it may push Iraq closer to Iran if the Iraqi government feels its autonomy is being threatened. Navigating this geopolitical minefield will require nuance.
Interesting development in the complex geopolitical dynamics between the US, Iraq, and Iran-backed militias. Blocking cash transfers is a strong economic lever, but it risks further destabilizing the region. I wonder how the Iraqi government will respond.
The US is clearly taking a hardline stance on Iranian influence in Iraq, even at the risk of damaging ties with the Iraqi government. Dismantling the PMF seems like a high-stakes gambit – will it succeed in curbing Iran’s proxy power?
You raise a good point. Disrupting the PMF could backfire and strengthen Iran’s hand if the Iraqi government feels its sovereignty is being undermined. Delicate balancing act for the US.
The US is really ratcheting up the pressure on Iraq to distance itself from Iranian influence. Cutting off financial flows is a potent economic weapon, but it runs the risk of backfiring if Iraq feels its sovereignty is being undermined. Delicate balance to strike here.
This escalation of economic pressure on Iraq is concerning. While the US wants to counter Iran’s regional influence, cutting off financial flows could have unintended consequences for the Iraqi economy and stability. Careful diplomacy will be crucial going forward.