Listen to the article
Pakistan has strongly refuted Afghan media reports claiming its military forces conducted an airstrike on a university in Afghanistan’s eastern Kunar province, dismissing the allegations as fabricated and politically motivated.
In an official statement issued Monday from Islamabad, Pakistan’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting responded to claims broadcast by Afghanistan’s TOLOnews that Pakistani forces had targeted Syed Jamaluddin Afghan University and surrounding residential areas. The Afghan media outlet had reported that the alleged attack resulted in three deaths and left 45 people injured.
“These allegations are entirely false,” the ministry declared in its statement. Pakistani officials characterized the reports as a calculated attempt to generate international sympathy while deflecting attention from internal issues within Afghanistan.
The statement emphasized that Pakistani security operations are conducted exclusively on the basis of verified intelligence and target specific threats. Officials insisted that Pakistan’s military doctrine explicitly prohibits attacks on civilian infrastructure, particularly educational institutions.
This incident occurs against a backdrop of increasingly strained relations between the neighboring countries. Since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, tensions have periodically flared along the disputed 2,600-kilometer border known as the Durand Line, with both sides occasionally accusing each other of harboring militants.
Security analysts familiar with the region note that information warfare has become a significant component of the complex Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship. Dr. Amir Khan, a regional security expert at the Institute for Strategic Studies in Islamabad, explained that “allegations of cross-border strikes have become increasingly common, with both sides using media narratives to shape international opinion.”
The Pakistani statement further suggested that the false reports are part of a pattern in which unsubstantiated claims are circulated through certain media outlets and then amplified beyond Afghanistan, particularly in regional media. According to Pakistani authorities, this represents a coordinated effort to damage Pakistan’s international standing.
Pakistani officials also connected these allegations to broader security concerns, suggesting that such reporting attempts to divert attention from what they describe as support for militant elements referred to as “Fitna al-Khawarij” – a term used by Pakistani authorities to describe certain extremist factions.
International observers have long noted the challenges in independently verifying incidents along the remote and mountainous Afghanistan-Pakistan border. The area’s difficult terrain and limited access for journalists make it particularly susceptible to competing narratives.
The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has not issued any statement regarding the alleged incident. In the past, UNAMA has documented civilian casualties from various forms of violence, including cross-border incidents, but verification typically requires substantial ground investigation.
Economic stakes further complicate relations between the neighbors. Pakistan serves as a crucial trade corridor for landlocked Afghanistan, with billions of dollars in annual trade flowing through official and unofficial channels across their shared border.
As of Tuesday, Afghan authorities had not responded to Pakistan’s denial. The Taliban government, which remains unrecognized by most nations including Pakistan, has previously accused Islamabad of violating Afghanistan’s sovereignty through cross-border operations.
The Pakistani ministry concluded its statement by reiterating that no attack occurred on Syed Jamaluddin Afghan University, characterizing the allegations as baseless propaganda designed to manipulate public opinion in the region.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


7 Comments
This appears to be a politically charged dispute between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Impartial fact-finding is needed to determine the truth of what happened. Rushing to conclusions without robust evidence risks further inflaming regional tensions.
Allegations of military strikes on civilian targets are extremely serious. Both sides should provide transparent, verifiable evidence to support their claims. Maintaining open channels of communication is key to de-escalating these types of disputes.
This seems like a politically charged dispute between the two nations. It would be prudent to wait for further verified information before making any conclusions. Careful reporting and objective analysis is crucial in sensitive security matters.
Agreed. Unsubstantiated claims from either side should be viewed with caution. The facts need to be established through impartial investigation before jumping to judgements.
Verifying the details of this incident is crucial given the potential for escalation. Both nations should engage in good-faith dialogue to establish the facts and prevent the situation from deteriorating further. Inflammatory rhetoric from either side is counterproductive.
Conflicting narratives are common in geopolitical conflicts. It’s important to seek out credible, fact-based sources when assessing complex regional security issues like this. Rushing to judgment could inflame tensions further.
Well said. In these situations, cool heads and measured responses are needed to avoid escalation. Responsible journalism that avoids amplifying unverified claims is crucial.