Listen to the article
Oregon Jury Orders PacifiCorp to Pay $305 Million in 2020 Wildfire Damages
A Portland jury has ordered utility company PacifiCorp to pay $305 million to 16 victims of Oregon’s catastrophic 2020 wildfires, marking the latest verdict in an ongoing class-action lawsuit that involves thousands of plaintiffs.
The Wednesday ruling by the Multnomah County Circuit Court specifically addresses victims of the Santiam Canyon fire in northwest Oregon. This verdict adds to PacifiCorp’s mounting legal obligations, as the utility has now been ordered to pay over $1 billion in damages to class members following a pivotal 2023 trial.
During that earlier proceeding, the company was found liable for negligently failing to cut power during a windstorm despite explicit warnings from top fire officials about extreme risk conditions. PacifiCorp is currently appealing these verdicts through the state court system, while more than 1,000 additional class members have cases scheduled for trial in 2026 and 2027.
The 2020 Labor Day weekend fires rank among the worst natural disasters in Oregon’s history. The devastating blazes killed 11 people, burned more than 1,560 square miles (4,040 square kilometers) of land, and destroyed thousands of homes across multiple communities.
“This verdict is a meaningful acknowledgment of the devastation they’ve endured and reaffirms the irreversible losses they’ve suffered as a result of the fires,” said Shawn Rabin, who led the trial team representing the plaintiffs.
PacifiCorp strongly disputes the ruling. In an emailed statement, the utility called it an “irresponsible outcome related to damages caused by a fire that PacifiCorp did not start or contribute to as determined by the Oregon Department of Forestry.” The company added, “This is why we have been and will continue to challenge these verdicts.”
The utility’s position draws support from a 2023 report by the Oregon Department of Forestry, which found that 12 of 19 fires in Santiam Canyon in September 2020 were caused by embers from another fire. While the report acknowledged that seven fires were caused by downed power lines, it concluded these blazes did not contribute to the larger conflagration in the canyon, as they were suppressed by residents or firefighters.
However, attorneys representing the plaintiffs have characterized this report as flawed and incomplete, claiming it omits crucial evidence that would demonstrate PacifiCorp’s liability.
The legal and financial repercussions for PacifiCorp extend well beyond this most recent verdict. The utility has separately agreed to pay over $2 billion to settle claims stemming from multiple lawsuits related to the 2020 blazes. This includes a substantial $575 million settlement with the federal government for wildfire damages on federal land in both Oregon and California.
These ongoing legal battles highlight the increasing liability risks facing utility companies in regions prone to wildfires, particularly as climate change contributes to more extreme fire conditions. Power providers across the western United States are under growing pressure to improve infrastructure safety, implement more aggressive vegetation management, and develop more sophisticated power shutoff protocols during high-risk weather events.
For the victims of the Santiam Canyon fire and other 2020 blazes, the verdicts represent acknowledgment of their losses, though many face years of rebuilding efforts. Meanwhile, the case continues to reverberate through Oregon’s legal system and the utility industry as a whole, potentially reshaping how companies prepare for and respond to wildfire threats in the future.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


18 Comments
Given the scale of the 2020 Oregon wildfires, a $305 million payout to victims seems appropriate, though the utility will surely appeal. Litigation like this is crucial to drive systemic changes in the industry.
True, the appeals process will likely drag on for years. But the precedent set by these verdicts will raise the bar for utilities to prioritize public safety.
It’s good to see PacifiCorp being held accountable, but the scale of the damages from these wildfires was immense. $305 million is substantial, but likely only a fraction of the total costs borne by victims and communities.
Sadly, you’re right. The human and environmental toll of these fires will linger for years. Utilities must do far more to mitigate wildfire risks, even if it cuts into profits.
While no amount of money can undo the trauma and loss from these wildfires, this verdict provides some measure of justice and accountability. The utility’s negligence had devastating human and environmental consequences.
You make a good point. Financial penalties alone can’t heal the wounds, but they do hold companies responsible and hopefully spur them to improve safety practices.
The 2020 Oregon wildfires were devastating, and this verdict shows that utilities can’t escape responsibility for negligence that contributes to such disasters. It’s a sobering reminder of the stakes involved in managing wildfire risks.
Well said. Utilities are essential infrastructure providers, but they must be accountable when their actions or inaction put communities in harm’s way. This ruling reinforces the need for robust wildfire mitigation and safety protocols.
It’s good to see the legal system delivering justice for the victims of these devastating wildfires. $305 million is a sizable penalty, though the total damages from these fires were likely much higher.
You’re right, this is just one case – there are likely thousands more impacted. Rebuilding and recovery efforts will be lengthy and costly for the affected communities.
Wildfires are becoming an increasingly serious threat, especially in the western US. Utilities have a responsibility to take all necessary precautions to prevent ignitions during high-risk conditions. This verdict sends a strong message.
Absolutely. Wildfire risk is only going to grow with climate change, so utilities must upgrade infrastructure and modernize operations to mitigate that risk.
This is a significant verdict against PacifiCorp for its role in the 2020 Oregon wildfires. Holding utilities accountable for negligence during high-risk conditions is critical to prevent future disasters and protect vulnerable communities.
Agreed, utilities must prioritize public safety over profits. Hopefully this ruling will encourage PacifiCorp and others to invest more in wildfire mitigation and response.
This is a significant win for the wildfire victims, but the real challenge will be ensuring PacifiCorp and other utilities make the necessary investments and operational changes to prevent future catastrophes.
Exactly. The courts can impose penalties, but lasting change requires a fundamental shift in utility culture and priorities. Ongoing oversight and accountability will be critical.
This verdict is an important step, but the broader issue of utility liability for wildfires remains a complex and contentious legal and policy issue. Balancing public safety, corporate responsibility, and ratepayer impacts is an ongoing challenge.
Absolutely. There are no easy solutions, but utilities must be held to the highest standards when it comes to preventing and responding to wildfire threats. Policymakers have a critical role to play in striking the right balance.