Listen to the article
U.S. National Park Service to Implement “America-First” Entry Fee Policy for Foreign Tourists
The National Park Service announced Tuesday it will begin charging international tourists an additional $100 to enter some of America’s most popular national parks, while reserving fee-free days exclusively for U.S. residents. The policy changes, set to take effect January 1, mark a significant shift in how the park system manages access and funding.
The new “America-first entry fee policies” will impact 11 of the nation’s most visited parks, including Grand Canyon, Yellowstone and Yosemite. Under the plan, foreign visitors will also see the price of annual parks passes increase dramatically from $80 to $250, while the cost for U.S. residents will remain unchanged at $80.
The policy shift comes as the National Park Service grapples with several challenges, including significant staffing reductions, severe budget constraints, and recovery from damage sustained during the recent government shutdown. The parks also lost substantial revenue during the shutdown period when entry fees could not be collected.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum defended the changes on social media, stating that the new fee structure ensures American taxpayers “continue to enjoy affordable access, while international visitors contribute their fair share to maintaining and improving our parks for future generations.”
The White House emphasized the policy’s nationalistic approach with an X post that concluded with the phrase “AMERICANS FIRST,” underscoring the administration’s prioritization of domestic visitors over international tourists.
This initiative follows a July executive order from President Donald Trump that specifically directed the National Park Service to increase entry fees for foreign tourists. The move represents a departure from the parks’ traditionally egalitarian approach to visitor fees.
International tourism to U.S. national parks represents a significant portion of overall visitation. The U.S. Travel Association estimated that in 2018, national parks and monuments welcomed more than 14 million international visitors. Individual parks like Yellowstone report varying levels of foreign visitation, with international tourists accounting for approximately 15% of its visitors in 2024, down from 30% in 2018.
The policy has already raised questions among conservation groups. “There’s a lot to unpack in this announcement, including many questions on its implementation – all which NPCA will raise with the Department of Interior,” said Kati Schmidt, a spokesperson for the National Parks Conservation Association, in an email statement.
Revenue generated from the increased fees will support critical park infrastructure, including visitor facilities upgrades and maintenance projects, according to the Department of Interior’s statement. This additional funding could help address the National Park Service’s well-documented maintenance backlog, which has grown substantially in recent years.
Another notable change involves the designation of “resident-only patriotic fee-free days.” Veterans Day, which was previously one of eight days when entry was free for all visitors, will now be restricted to U.S. residents only. This modification contradicts the Department of Interior’s earlier statements about ensuring that “everyone, no matter their ZIP code, can access and enjoy the benefits of green spaces and our public lands.”
The policy shift raises broader questions about accessibility to America’s natural treasures and the balance between generating necessary revenue and maintaining the parks’ mission of preservation and public enjoyment. As implementation approaches, park advocates and international tourism organizations will be closely monitoring how these changes affect visitation patterns and the financial health of the National Park system.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
As someone who enjoys the parks, I’m concerned this new fee structure could price out many international travelers. The parks should be accessible to all, not just those who can afford steep entry fees.
That’s a valid concern. The parks should be inclusive public spaces, not elite enclaves. I hope the National Park Service reconsiders this policy.
As someone who has enjoyed many of these parks, I’m concerned this could undermine the goal of making them accessible to a global audience. The parks are natural wonders that belong to all of humanity, not just Americans.
Well said. The parks should aim to bring people together, not divide them based on nationality.
While I understand the desire to prioritize domestic visitors, I worry this could have unintended consequences for the parks’ budgets and broader appeal. Increased fees may deter international tourists who contribute significantly to park revenues.
That’s a fair point. The parks need to balance accessibility, funding, and global appeal. This seems like a risky approach that could backfire.
Interesting move by the National Park Service. I’m curious to see how this new “America-first” policy plays out in practice – will it actually boost domestic visitation or just result in fewer overall tourists?
That’s a good question. It will be important to monitor the effects on park attendance, revenue, and public perception over time.
This seems like a politically-motivated decision rather than one based on sound park management principles. I hope the additional fees don’t price out international visitors who may have limited means to travel to the US.
Agreed. The parks should be accessible to all, regardless of nationality. Hopefully this doesn’t backfire and hurt the parks in the long run.
This is an interesting policy shift, though I’m not sure it’s the best approach. Maintaining the parks as shared global resources seems more in line with their mission than prioritizing American visitors. Hopefully they can find a more balanced solution.
Agreed. The parks should strive to be welcoming to all, not just domestic tourists. I hope they reconsider this plan or find a more equitable way to manage access and funding.
While I understand the goal of prioritizing American visitors, I worry this policy could backfire and reduce overall park revenues if international tourism declines. The parks should aim to be welcoming to all, not just domestic tourists.
Good point. Striking the right balance between accessibility and funding is crucial. Hopefully they can find a more nuanced approach that doesn’t alienate international travelers.
This seems like a heavy-handed approach to managing park access and funding. While I understand the desire to prioritize American visitors, charging such steep fees for international tourists may negatively impact the parks’ global appeal and accessibility.
I agree. There could be unintended consequences, like reduced tourism revenue, that undermine the parks’ long-term sustainability.