Listen to the article
North Korea’s Propaganda Tactics Mirror Historical Totalitarian Methods, Expert Says
North Korean propaganda continues to employ century-old tactics used by totalitarian regimes to control populations and suppress critical thinking, according to Jihyun Park, a British Korean Conservative politician and North Korean escapee.
The regime’s persistent imagery of leader Kim Jong Un riding a white horse on Mount Paektu—a symbol that recently puzzled a Polish university student—represents more than mere political theater. This imagery directly traces its lineage to Kaiser Wilhelm II’s propaganda techniques of the early 20th century.
“The ‘white horse’ symbol can be traced back a century to the Kaiser’s propaganda,” explains Park. “He was obsessed with visualizing himself as a monarch blessed by divine grace, adorned in splendid military uniforms and mounted on a white horse.”
This symbolism serves a specific purpose: it presents the leader not as someone requiring legitimacy through democratic means, but as a figure “beyond doubt” whose authority is absolute and unquestionable.
The Kim regime has adapted these tactics under the banner of the “Baekdu bloodline,” transforming what might be political legitimacy elsewhere into something resembling religious lineage. This approach eliminates the space where rational judgment might intervene, replacing individual thought with collective obedience.
North Korea’s propaganda machine has also appropriated natural landmarks for political purposes. While Nazi Germany once used the Harz Mountains to inspire national pride, North Korea has gone further by physically altering Mount Paektu itself.
“North Korea has effectively taxidermized the vast natural landscape of Mount Paektu into the private domain of the Kim family,” Park notes. Living trees have been stripped and carved with political slogans as “slogan trees,” while massive rock faces bear inscriptions like “Jong-il Peak”—representing what Park calls a “grotesque culmination of idolization.”
Like all totalitarian propaganda systems, North Korea’s requires external enemies to maintain internal cohesion. The regime routinely directs dehumanizing language toward South Korea and the United States, labeling them with terms like “American running dogs,” “idiots,” and “rabid beasts drenched in blood.”
Former South Korean President Park Geun-hye faced particularly severe personal attacks in North Korean propaganda, including being called a “prostitute,” “comfort woman of the United States,” and “cunning courtesan.” North Korean media also targeted her appearance and unmarried status with terms like “wrinkled old face covered in heavy makeup” and “bizarre old maid.”
These tactics mirror how Nazi propaganda once vilified Winston Churchill and Britain, dehumanizing opponents to justify violence and shift blame for domestic failures onto external enemies.
“When an opponent is depicted not as human, but as a ‘monster,’ all violence becomes justified,” Park explains. “Complex reality is reduced to simple hatred, and human beings are diminished into disposable targets.”
Breaking the grip of such propaganda requires more than counter-information. Park emphasizes that escaping indoctrination begins with “the permission of small doubt” and “contact with reality.” For many North Koreans, this comes through external broadcasts like Voice of America-Korea and Radio Free Asia-Korea.
“They are windows that prove the existence of another world,” Park says of these media outlets. While listeners may not immediately believe what they hear, repeated exposure eventually plants seeds of doubt.
Drawing from her own experience as a two-time escapee from North Korea, Park maintains that individual questioning remains the most powerful antidote to propaganda. “The courage to see nature as nature and history as history, the ability to pause amid a flood of engineered information and think for oneself—these alone can strip Mount Paektu of its chains.”
As propaganda continues to evolve in the digital age, Park warns that sophisticated psychological engineering now extends beyond traditional totalitarian states, with some climate change narratives potentially employing similar techniques of moral authority to control public opinion.
“Propaganda offers you the illusion of community,” Park concludes, “but in return, it demands your critical reason.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


15 Comments
The parallels between the Kim regime’s tactics and those of earlier totalitarian leaders are quite striking. This serves as a cautionary tale about the enduring threat of propaganda and the need for vigilance in defending democratic values.
Well said. Awareness of these historical patterns is crucial for inoculating the public against the manipulative effects of authoritarian propaganda.
While the ‘Baekdu bloodline’ imagery is visually striking, it’s concerning to see how it serves to undermine democratic legitimacy in favor of a cult of personality. Propaganda tactics like this are a real threat to critical thinking.
This article highlights the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in the face of sophisticated propaganda efforts. Understanding the lineage of these tactics can help us identify and counter them more effectively.
Absolutely. Promoting critical analysis of propaganda techniques, both past and present, is essential for safeguarding democratic institutions and norms.
Fascinating how totalitarian regimes recycle propaganda techniques across history. The ‘white horse’ imagery is a clever way to portray the leader as divinely ordained rather than democratically accountable.
You’re right, it’s a timeless tactic to cultivate an aura of mysticism and absolute authority around the leader.
This is a sobering reminder of the power of symbols and imagery in shaping political narratives, especially in the hands of totalitarian regimes. The ‘white horse’ symbolism is a prime example of how the past can inform the present in insidious ways.
The Kim regime’s use of the ‘white horse’ imagery to assert divine authority is a chilling example of how authoritarian leaders can leverage historical propaganda tactics for their own ends. This serves as a sobering reminder of the enduring threat of totalitarianism.
The persistence of these propaganda techniques across time and place is both fascinating and troubling. It highlights the need for vigilance in identifying and countering such manipulative tactics, no matter where they arise.
Absolutely. Staying informed about the historical origins and patterns of authoritarian propaganda is crucial for protecting democratic institutions and values.
I’m curious to learn more about the historical lineage of these propaganda methods. It’s intriguing how they persist across different totalitarian contexts, from early 20th century Europe to modern-day North Korea.
Agreed, understanding these historical precedents can shed light on the underlying psychology and motivations behind authoritarian propaganda.
It’s interesting to see how the Kim regime has adapted these century-old propaganda techniques to support their ‘Baekdu bloodline’ myth. This underscores the importance of understanding historical context when analyzing modern authoritarian propaganda.
Indeed, the ability of these tactics to persist and evolve across different political contexts is both fascinating and deeply concerning.