Listen to the article
Georgia’s Security Service Identifies Russian Occupation and Disinformation Campaigns as Key National Threats
Georgia’s State Security Service has presented its comprehensive 2025 security report to parliament, highlighting Russian occupation of Georgian territories and sophisticated disinformation campaigns as the most significant threats facing the nation.
The report identifies the ongoing Russian occupation of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region (recognized by Russia as South Ossetia) as Georgia’s primary national security concern. According to the document, Russia continues to use these occupied territories as leverage against Georgia, with officials warning that the situation represents a potential pathway toward full annexation.
“In 2025, dozens of cases of ‘borderisation’ were recorded — fences and barbed wire continue to be installed along the dividing lines,” the report states. The practice of “borderisation” refers to Russia’s unilateral creation of physical barriers along administrative boundary lines, further isolating these regions from Georgian control.
The security service documented 74 detentions of Georgian citizens over the past year — 34 in the Tskhinvali region and 40 in Abkhazia. By the end of 2025, 15 individuals remained in custody, with some serving lengthy sentences. Officials emphasized that these detentions function as a pressure mechanism against Georgian authorities and constitute serious human rights violations.
The report also highlights systematic discrimination against ethnic Georgians in both occupied regions, noting that education systems in these territories are being weaponized as instruments of Russian influence.
Beyond the occupation issue, the security service identified organized disinformation campaigns as a major challenge to national stability. These campaigns reportedly target specific demographic groups, particularly young people and communities in regions with significant ethnic and religious minority populations. According to the report, such operations aim to deepen societal polarization and undermine Georgia’s international image as a state with democratic and Western values.
In an unexpected turn, the document suggests that information campaigns originating from Western countries and institutions sometimes employ “double standards” that contribute to growing public skepticism toward Georgian state institutions. This claim appears within a broader section discussing global information warfare and competing narratives.
The security service disclosed that it has identified specific organizations and individuals with alleged connections to foreign intelligence services who are orchestrating information operations inside Georgia. The report states that these actors intentionally promote divisive narratives designed to incite nationalist sentiment and regional conflicts within the country.
Technological developments, particularly artificial intelligence, received special attention in the report. The security service warned that AI advances significantly increase the risk of sophisticated disinformation campaigns capable of inflaming ethnic and religious tensions while potentially triggering political and socioeconomic crises.
“The evolution of artificial intelligence capabilities presents unprecedented challenges for national security agencies worldwide, and Georgia is no exception,” a security expert familiar with the report told journalists. “These technologies can generate highly convincing fake content that’s increasingly difficult to distinguish from authentic information.”
The Georgian security service indicated it is actively developing capabilities to counter these emerging threats, including studying international best practices and implementing new monitoring systems.
This report comes against the backdrop of Georgia’s complex geopolitical position between Russia and the West. Relations with Moscow have remained tense since the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, which resulted in Russia’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states — a move rejected by most of the international community.
The security service’s findings highlight the multifaceted challenges facing Georgia as it navigates both conventional security threats and evolving information warfare tactics in an increasingly complex regional security environment.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


8 Comments
This report highlights the complex security challenges facing Georgia. The combination of physical occupation, borderisation, and disinformation campaigns appears to be a multifaceted threat. I’m interested to learn more about the specific strategies Georgia is employing to address these issues.
The details around the ‘borderisation’ practices and detentions of Georgian citizens are particularly alarming. It’s clear Russia is using these occupied territories as leverage against Georgia. This is a complex geopolitical issue that deserves close attention.
Agreed, Russia’s actions appear to be a blatant violation of Georgia’s territorial integrity. This is a concerning trend that the international community should closely monitor and address.
The potential for full annexation of the occupied regions is a serious concern. Russia’s actions seem aimed at undermining Georgia’s sovereignty and independence. I hope the Georgian government can find effective ways to push back against this aggressive behavior.
You raise a valid point. Full annexation would be a devastating blow to Georgia’s territorial integrity and national security. Ongoing international pressure and support will be crucial in preventing such an outcome.
This is a concerning report on the growing national security threats facing Georgia. The ongoing Russian occupation and disinformation campaigns seem to pose serious challenges. I’m curious to learn more about the specific tactics and impacts of these issues.
You’re right, the situation sounds quite precarious. I hope Georgia can find ways to effectively counter the Russian influence and mitigate these threats to its sovereignty.
Sophisticated disinformation campaigns are a growing threat, not just for Georgia but many countries. Combating this kind of hybrid warfare requires a multi-faceted approach. I’m curious to learn more about the specific tactics and sources of these disinformation efforts.