Listen to the article
In a recent escalation of tensions, the Caucasus Muslims’ Board has strongly condemned a statement by the Church of Echmiadzin regarding the demolition of two structures in Khankendi, Azerbaijan, characterizing it as “hostility and disinformation.”
The controversy centers around two buildings demolished in Khankendi (also known internationally as Stepanakert), a city that was at the heart of the decades-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The Church of Echmiadzin, Armenia’s main religious authority, issued a statement on April 23 claiming these demolitions represented an attack on religious and cultural heritage.
In its forceful rebuttal, the Caucasus Muslims’ Board emphasized that the timing of Echmiadzin’s accusations was particularly problematic, coming during a sensitive period when Azerbaijan and Armenia have been engaged in a normalization process aimed at establishing lasting peace after the 2020 war and Azerbaijan’s subsequent restoration of control over the contested territories in 2023.
“At a sensitive time when the normalization process between the two countries is underway, baseless accusations against Azerbaijan by Echmiadzin, which has remained silent about the destruction and insult of historical, religious and cultural monuments of Azerbaijan for decades during the occupation, is a failed attempt to politicize the issue,” the Board stated.
The statement further clarified the legal status of the demolished structures, asserting they were built illegally during the Armenian occupation of Azerbaijani territories. According to the Caucasus Muslims’ Board, these buildings were kept intact by Azerbaijan after it regained control of the region in 2023, but were ultimately removed following repeated appeals from returning internally displaced Azerbaijanis.
The Board cited international humanitarian law principles, noting that “structures built by an occupying power in an occupied territory without consent are considered illegal, regardless of their purpose, and, as a rule, must be demolished at the expense of the occupying power.”
This incident highlights the ongoing challenges of post-conflict reconciliation in the South Caucasus region. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which began in the late 1980s and intensified after the collapse of the Soviet Union, resulted in hundreds of thousands of displaced people on both sides and significant damage to cultural and religious sites throughout the contested territories.
Azerbaijan has consistently presented itself as a model of religious tolerance in the region. The Caucasus Muslims’ Board emphasized this point, stating that Azerbaijan is “one of the rare countries where mosques, churches and synagogues are located side by side, which demonstrates the deep-rooted culture of religious tolerance and respect for all religions by our people.”
As evidence of this commitment, the statement highlighted Azerbaijan’s restoration of the Armenian Gazanchi Church in Shusha and the continued protection of the Armenian Church in Baku throughout the conflict period. These efforts, according to the Board, reflect Azerbaijan’s broader commitment to preserving religious plurality across the country.
Regional analysts note that religious sites have frequently become flashpoints in the territorial dispute, with both sides accusing each other of destroying or desecrating culturally significant buildings and monuments. UNESCO and other international organizations have repeatedly called for the protection of cultural heritage in the region, regardless of ethnic or religious affiliation.
The Caucasus Muslims’ Board concluded its statement with a call to end “political provocations left over from the past,” emphasizing that such actions undermine the prospects for lasting peace in a region that has suffered from decades of conflict and displacement.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


18 Comments
I’m curious to learn more about the specific buildings that were demolished and the historical and cultural significance they held. It’s important that any actions taken respect religious and cultural heritage on all sides.
That’s a good point. More transparency around the nature and context of these demolitions would help provide a clearer picture of what transpired and whether it was justified.
While I don’t have enough context to assess the validity of the claims on either side, it’s clear this is a sensitive and complex issue with historical roots. Hopefully the parties can find a way forward that respects the rights and concerns of all involved.
Agreed, more information is needed to fully understand the nuances here. Constructive dialogue and good-faith efforts to find common ground will be crucial.
This dispute underscores the complexity of the geopolitical landscape in the Caucasus. While I don’t have a full understanding of the specifics, it’s clear that open and transparent dialogue will be crucial to finding a peaceful resolution that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders.
Well said. The path forward likely requires compromise and a willingness to consider the perspectives of all involved, rather than entrenching positions.
This dispute seems to highlight the delicate balance between national sovereignty and protecting cultural/religious sites. I hope the parties can find a way to address Azerbaijan’s security concerns while also preserving important heritage.
Navigating that balance will be challenging, but open and good-faith dialogue between Azerbaijan and Armenia seems essential to finding an equitable solution.
The normalization process between Azerbaijan and Armenia is encouraging, but incidents like this risk undermining the progress. Both sides should work to de-escalate tensions and focus on areas of shared interest and common ground.
Absolutely. Maintaining momentum on the normalization efforts will require mutual understanding, compromise, and a commitment to resolving disputes through peaceful means.
Tensions over cultural and religious sites can be highly emotive and politically charged. I hope the parties involved can find a way to de-escalate the situation and work towards a mutually acceptable solution through constructive dialogue and good-faith negotiations.
Agreed. Maintaining open communication channels and a commitment to resolving disputes peacefully will be essential as Azerbaijan and Armenia navigate this sensitive issue.
This dispute highlights the ongoing tensions and challenges in the Caucasus region. It’s important that all parties approach this issue with empathy, nuance, and a commitment to peaceful resolution. Rushing to judgment or escalating rhetoric is unlikely to be productive.
Well said. Maintaining open channels of communication and a willingness to compromise will be essential as Azerbaijan and Armenia navigate this sensitive situation.
The demolition of religious or cultural sites is always a sensitive matter, regardless of the circumstances. I hope the parties involved can find a way to address security concerns while also respecting and preserving important heritage.
Agreed. Balancing national interests with the protection of cultural/religious sites will require nuanced, good-faith negotiations between the parties.
This seems like a complex geopolitical and religious issue. It’s concerning to see tensions escalating between Azerbaijan and Armenia, especially as they work to normalize relations. I hope they can find a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and heritage of all parties involved.
Agreed, it’s crucial that the normalization process between Azerbaijan and Armenia continues despite these accusations. Maintaining open dialogue will be key to finding a mutually acceptable solution.