Listen to the article
Some U.S. water utilities are facing an unexpected challenge as the ongoing conflict in the Middle East disrupts their ability to maintain recommended fluoride levels in drinking water supplies.
The Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies reports that several water utilities across the country have experienced supply disruptions in recent weeks. This shortage affects the delivery of fluoride, which has been added to water systems for decades as a public health measure to prevent tooth decay.
The supply chain disruption stems directly from the conflict in the Middle East. Israel ranks among the world’s top exporters of fluorosilicic acid, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with the United States being one of the top five global importers of this chemical.
Dan Hartnett, chief policy officer for the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, explained the root cause: “At least one Israeli supplier has been facing workforce challenges because many employees have been called into active military service. That has led to decreased production, and supply shortages for the U.S. market.”
While the number of affected water utilities remains relatively small, the impact is already reaching hundreds of thousands of consumers. Industry experts warn that as the Middle Eastern conflict persists, “there will likely be additional stressors placed on the supply chain, leading to shortages in additional communities,” according to Hartnett.
Among those affected is WSSC Water in Maryland, the nation’s eighth-largest water and wastewater utility. On April 7, officials announced they were reducing fluoride levels in drinking water to 0.4 milligrams per liter, down from the CDC-recommended 0.7 milligrams per liter.
Chuck Brown, spokesperson for WSSC Water, which serves 1.9 million customers, stated they were uncertain about the duration of the shortage but expressed confidence in their ability to “stretch that out for a couple more months.” Similarly, in Pennsylvania, the borough of Lititz temporarily halted fluoridation for several weeks last month due to supply constraints.
Health officials emphasize that the fluoride reduction poses no safety concerns for drinking water, as utilities add fluoride voluntarily as a dental health benefit rather than for water safety purposes.
Dr. Scott Tomar, a community water fluoridation expert with the American Dental Association, reassured the public that a temporary reduction in fluoride levels is unlikely to cause significant dental health concerns for most people. However, he noted that research from locations that have ceased fluoridation—including Calgary, Canada; Juneau, Alaska; and Israel—shows that lower fluoride levels can impact dental health over years.
“Based on the best available information we have, below about 0.5 milligrams per liter, you’re probably not going to see effective preventive exposure,” Dr. Tomar explained. He added that young children would likely be the first to experience the effects of reduced fluoride, as it strengthens enamel during tooth development.
For residents in affected areas, Dr. Tomar recommends maintaining rigorous oral hygiene practices, including brushing twice daily with fluoride toothpaste and keeping regular dental appointments. He advises against taking fluoride supplements without first consulting a dentist.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans receive fluoridated drinking water, according to CDC data. The addition of low fluoride levels to drinking water has long been considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century, with the American Dental Association crediting it with reducing tooth decay by more than 25% in both children and adults.
Despite its proven benefits, fluoridation has faced growing skepticism. Last year, Utah became the first state to ban public water fluoridation, and recently appointed Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has repeatedly questioned fluoride’s safety and restricted its use for dental health purposes.
Dr. Tomar firmly counters such concerns: “The levels we use in the United States are perfectly safe. Despite a lot of the misinformation, there are no adverse health effects associated with the levels we use in our drinking water.”
As the Middle East conflict continues, water utilities and public health officials will monitor the situation closely, potentially implementing additional conservation measures if the fluoride shortage persists or worsens.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
This is a timely reminder of the importance of secure and reliable supply chains for essential resources like fluoride. I’ll be following this story closely to see how the water utilities and government respond to address the shortage. Hopefully they can find a way to minimize any potential public health risks.
As someone who values public health, I’m concerned about the potential impacts of this fluoride shortage on dental care, especially for lower-income communities that rely on fluoridated water. I hope the water utilities can find creative solutions to maintain recommended fluoride levels.
The fluoride supply chain disruption highlights how vulnerable our critical infrastructure can be to geopolitical events. I wonder what other essential commodities or chemicals might be at risk of shortages due to similar supply chain issues. It’s a good reminder of the need for resilience and diversification.
This fluoride shortage highlights the interconnectedness of global supply chains and the vulnerabilities they can create. I wonder if there are any lessons that can be learned to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure like water treatment systems. It’s an issue worth monitoring closely.
It’s interesting to see how geopolitical conflicts can have such far-reaching effects on something as basic as water treatment. I’m curious to learn more about the alternatives water utilities might explore to supplement the fluoride supply.
Good point. Perhaps they could look into domestic fluoride production or alternative fluoridation methods to reduce their reliance on imports. It’ll be important to find sustainable solutions.
This is a concerning development, especially given the public health benefits of fluoridated water. I hope the water utilities are able to quickly adapt and find reliable sources of fluoride to maintain proper levels. It’s a tricky situation with far-reaching implications.
Wow, this fluoride shortage sounds like a real headache for U.S. water utilities. I wonder how they’ll manage to maintain proper fluoride levels without disrupting their operations. Hopefully the supply chain issues can be resolved quickly.
The fluoride supply chain disruption is a complex issue with a lot of moving parts. I’m curious to learn more about the specific impacts on different regions and communities, as well as any longer-term implications for water treatment and public health. It’s certainly an important story to follow.