Listen to the article
FEMA Reverses Course, Offers to Rehire Disaster Workers Amid Legal Challenge
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has begun offering new appointments to disaster workers whose contracts were not renewed in January, according to a notice filed in federal court Friday evening. The reversal comes after months of controversy that led to a coalition lawsuit against the Trump administration.
U.S. Attorney Craig H. Missakian informed the U.S. District Court in San Francisco that FEMA has “initiated contact to offer new appointments” to term-limited staff whose contracts expired during the first three weeks of January. This development marks a significant policy shift that could affect hundreds of emergency response professionals.
The decision impacts FEMA’s Cadre of On-Call Response/Recovery Employees (CORE), who constitute approximately half of the agency’s workforce. These workers typically serve on two- to four-year contracts that have traditionally been renewed routinely, allowing some employees to build careers spanning decades within the system.
Earlier this year, FEMA abruptly halted contract renewals for some CORE employees as their terms expired, while extending others by only 90 days. According to a sworn declaration by FEMA’s temporary leader Karen S. Evans, 159 CORE employees had their contracts terminated before the agency paused the practice in late January, coinciding with a severe winter storm that affected multiple states.
The American Federation of Government Employees and other organizations sued the administration, alleging these actions were part of a broader plan to slash FEMA’s workforce by 50 percent. The lawsuit claimed such reductions would undermine the agency’s congressional mandate to ensure national disaster preparedness.
Evans denied in court filings any “blanket” elimination plan for CORE employees and maintained that the nonrenewals “do not threaten FEMA’s ability to perform its statutory mandate.”
This reversal appears to be part of a broader shift at the Department of Homeland Security under new Secretary Markwayne Mullin, who has been moving away from policies implemented during Kristi Noem’s brief tenure as DHS leader before her dismissal. Earlier this week, FEMA also reinstated 14 employees who had been placed on paid administrative leave for eight months after signing a public letter criticizing certain policies at FEMA and DHS.
Industry observers suggest the timing may be linked to concerns about FEMA’s preparedness for the upcoming Atlantic hurricane season and major planned events like the FIFA World Cup. The agency faces mounting pressure to maintain adequate staffing levels to respond to potential natural disasters during these high-profile periods.
A FEMA spokesperson declined to comment specifically on the court notice or provide details on how many former employees had received offers to return. However, the agency acknowledged it is “addressing outstanding personnel actions to ensure workforce stability and a strong, deployable surge force for upcoming national events and potential disasters.”
The impact on the ongoing lawsuit remains unclear. Plaintiffs’ lawyers indicated they would respond “after proper factual investigation.” They were scheduled to depose former DHS Deputy Chief of Staff Joseph Guy next week as part of discovery efforts surrounding the decision-making process that led to the CORE dismissals.
According to internal communications reviewed by the Associated Press, FEMA has also announced that CORE employees with contracts ending between January and May who previously received 90-day extensions “may be reappointed for up to one year.” Similarly, “eligible” FEMA reservists will see their contracts renewed for two years, affecting approximately 7,000 employees in the surge workforce whose contracts are set to expire on May 2.
“Our readiness directly impacts our ability to help Americans in need,” stated an internal email to staff, “and every employee plays a critical role in meeting these challenges.”
At least two CORE employees have already been contacted about returning to their positions, according to a current FEMA employee who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
19 Comments
The reversal on contract renewals highlights the challenges FEMA faces in balancing workforce management with the need for continuity and institutional knowledge. Rehiring these workers is a prudent move to strengthen the agency’s capabilities.
Interesting that FEMA is offering jobs to workers they previously let go. Rehiring experienced disaster response professionals seems like a smart move to strengthen the agency’s capabilities.
Agreed, retaining knowledgeable staff is crucial for FEMA to effectively manage emergency situations. Continuity is key.
This policy reversal suggests FEMA may have underestimated the value of its CORE employees. Rehiring these workers shows the agency recognizes the importance of institutional knowledge and operational experience.
Absolutely. Experienced emergency responders are a vital asset, and FEMA is wise to prioritize their retention and rehiring.
It’s encouraging to see FEMA taking steps to address the concerns raised by the coalition lawsuit. Retaining experienced disaster response professionals is essential for the agency to fulfill its mandate effectively.
While the reversal is welcome news, one has to wonder why FEMA initially decided to let go of these experienced workers in the first place. Was it a cost-cutting measure or part of a larger organizational restructuring?
That’s a good point. The article doesn’t provide much context on the original decision, so it’s hard to say what the underlying reasons were. Hopefully FEMA has learned from this experience.
This is an encouraging development, as it suggests FEMA is willing to adapt and learn from its mistakes. Retaining experienced personnel is crucial for an agency like FEMA to fulfill its critical responsibilities effectively.
This is an important development for the disaster response community. Maintaining a skilled, experienced workforce is vital for FEMA to fulfill its critical mission. Stabilizing the CORE program is a step in the right direction.
This policy change by FEMA is a positive step, as it recognizes the value of retaining experienced emergency response professionals. Continuity and institutional knowledge are critical for an agency like FEMA.
The reversal on contract renewals for CORE employees is an important development. Maintaining a stable and capable disaster response workforce should be a top priority for FEMA, and this move seems to address that need.
This highlights the importance of maintaining a stable and capable workforce, especially for government agencies tasked with disaster response and recovery. Continuity of operations is crucial during emergencies.
It’s encouraging to see FEMA taking steps to retain its emergency response professionals. Consistency and institutional knowledge are invaluable assets, especially for an agency that deals with high-stakes, time-sensitive situations.
I wonder what prompted FEMA’s policy reversal on contract renewals. Was it due to legal challenges or concerns about losing institutional knowledge and operational capacity?
Good question. The article mentions a coalition lawsuit, so the legal pressure may have played a role in FEMA’s decision to rehire the terminated workers.
It’s good to see FEMA taking steps to address the concerns raised by the coalition lawsuit. Maintaining a skilled and experienced disaster response workforce is essential for the agency to fulfill its mandate effectively.
I agree. FEMA’s decision to rehire the terminated workers shows a commitment to learning from past missteps and prioritizing operational readiness.
While the initial decision to let go of these CORE employees was concerning, it’s good to see FEMA taking corrective action. Maintaining a skilled and dedicated disaster response workforce should be a top priority.