Listen to the article
Canadian-Hungarian-British writer David Szalay has claimed the prestigious Booker Prize for his novel “Flesh,” a spare, unadorned account of one man’s journey from working-class Hungarian roots to extraordinary wealth in Britain.
The 51-year-old author received the coveted literary award at a ceremony in London’s Old Billingsgate on Monday, beating five other finalists including frontrunners Andrew Miller of Britain and Indian author Kiran Desai. The prize carries a £50,000 ($66,000) reward and typically delivers a significant boost to the winner’s sales and literary profile.
“Flesh” emerged as the unanimous choice after judges deliberated for five hours. Roddy Doyle, the Irish writer who chaired the judging panel, described Szalay’s novel as “a book about living, and the strangeness of living.”
The winning novel follows the life of taciturn protagonist István, chronicling his teenage relationship with an older woman, his struggles as an immigrant in Britain, and his unexpected ascension to London high society. What distinguishes “Flesh” is its deliberate narrative restraint – major life events, including imprisonment and military service in Iraq, occur off the page.
“He is quite an opaque character,” Szalay acknowledged at a press conference following his win. “He doesn’t explain himself to the reader. He isn’t very articulate. So I really didn’t know quite how people would respond to him as a character.”
This unconventional approach has polarized critics. While many praised the novel’s technical accomplishment, others expressed frustration with its refusal to fill narrative gaps and its emotionally restrained central character, whose most frequent utterance is simply “Okay.”
Doyle defended these artistic choices, explaining what made the novel stand out: “We loved the spareness of the writing. We loved how so much was revealed without us being overly aware that it was being revealed… If the gaps were filled, it would be less of a book.”
The judge also highlighted how “Flesh” gives voice to an often-overlooked demographic in literary fiction: working-class men. Since reading the novel, Doyle said he looks more closely at bouncers standing in doorways of Dublin pubs. “I’m kind of giving him a second look, because I feel I might know him a bit better,” he remarked.
Szalay, who was born in Montreal to a Hungarian father and Canadian mother before being raised in the UK, wrote “Flesh” under pressure after abandoning a novel he had been working on for four years. He now lives in Vienna and was previously shortlisted for the Booker in 2016 for “All That Man Is,” a collection of stories featuring nine disparate male characters.
Accepting his trophy, Szalay thanked the judges for recognizing his “risky” novel. He recalled asking his editor “whether she could imagine a novel called ‘Flesh’ winning the Booker Prize.” With a smile, he concluded: “You have your answer.”
The Booker Prize, established in 1969 and open to English-language novels worldwide, has a storied history of career transformation for its recipients. Past winners include literary luminaries such as Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan, Arundhati Roy, and Margaret Atwood. Last year’s winner, Samantha Harvey, took the prize for her space station narrative “Orbital.”
The selection process narrowed 153 submitted novels to a shortlist of six, with the final decision made by a judging panel that included Doyle and “Sex and the City” star Sarah Jessica Parker.
When asked about his plans for the prize money, Szalay modestly suggested “going on a nice little holiday with a bit of it and put the rest in the bank.” Harvey, who presented Szalay with the trophy, offered pragmatic advice to the new winner: “Buckle up, and get a good accountant.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
While I don’t typically read a lot of literary fiction, the Booker Prize win for ‘Flesh’ has me reconsidering. The novel’s focus on the immigrant experience and a protagonist’s unlikely ascent to high society feels timely and relevant. Might have to give it a try.
That’s a great point. In an era of growing nationalism and xenophobia, a nuanced exploration of the immigrant story could be a valuable contribution. Szalay’s approach of downplaying the drama and focusing on the ‘strangeness of living’ sounds like a refreshing take.
Congratulations to David Szalay on this career-defining literary honor. Winning the Booker Prize is no small feat, and it’s encouraging to see the judges recognize a work that explores the complexities of class, identity, and personal growth.
Agreed. Tackling those weighty themes with a ‘spare, unadorned’ style takes real skill as a writer. I’m intrigued to read ‘Flesh’ and see how Szalay brings those elements to life on the page.
Intriguing to see a lesser-known author like Szalay win the prestigious Booker Prize. His novel ‘Flesh’ seems to offer a unique, understated take on the immigrant experience and personal transformation. I’m curious to learn more about his narrative approach.
Indeed, the excerpt suggests Szalay has a very sparse, minimalist writing style that focuses on the essence of the protagonist’s journey rather than overt drama. Sounds like a refreshing change of pace from more sensationalized literary fiction.
Kudos to David Szalay for this major literary achievement. Winning the Booker Prize is no easy feat, and it’s exciting to see a lesser-known author like him gain this level of recognition. I’m curious to see how ‘Flesh’ stands the test of time compared to other recent Booker winners.
I’m not familiar with Szalay’s work, but this Booker win has certainly piqued my interest. An ‘earthy,’ character-driven novel that chronicles a Hungarian immigrant’s journey to wealth in Britain sounds like a compelling read. I’ll have to check it out.
Same here. The premise and critical praise for ‘Flesh’ make it sound like a thought-provoking exploration of class, identity, and personal transformation. I’m glad to see the Booker committee shine a spotlight on a lesser-known author with an intriguing literary voice.