Listen to the article
Slovenia’s Public Broadcaster Boycotts Eurovision Over Israel’s Participation
Slovenia’s national broadcaster RTV Slovenia announced Thursday it will not air the Eurovision Song Contest this year, reinforcing the country’s earlier decision to withdraw from the competition due to Israel’s participation.
The popular European music competition, scheduled for May 12-16 in Vienna, will proceed with 35 competing countries. However, Slovenia joins a growing list of nations—including Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Spain—that have chosen to boycott the event entirely.
“We will not be broadcasting the Eurovision Song Contest,” RTV Slovenia director Ksenija Horvat confirmed to The Associated Press. Instead, the broadcaster plans to air “Voices of Palestine,” a film series featuring Palestinian documentaries and feature films, signaling a deliberate political statement.
The boycott stems from a December decision by Eurovision organizers to allow Israel to compete despite mounting international criticism of its military operations in Gaza. Slovenia has been among the more vocal European nations condemning Israel’s conduct in the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, which began after Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel.
This year’s Eurovision controversy highlights the increasing difficulty of separating cultural events from geopolitical tensions. While the contest has long promoted itself as a celebration of music that transcends political divisions, it has repeatedly found itself entangled in international conflicts. In 2022, organizers expelled Russia following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, setting a precedent for addressing political situations through participation restrictions.
The Israel-Hamas war has particularly inflamed tensions around this year’s competition. Pro-Palestinian activists have organized protests at various Eurovision-related venues, arguing that allowing Israel to participate normalizes its military actions in Gaza, where the death toll has risen dramatically since October. In response, Eurovision organizers have implemented stricter measures against political demonstrations, including limitations on flag-waving and political messaging during performances.
Industry observers note that Eurovision’s global audience of approximately 160 million viewers makes it an attractive platform for political statements, despite organizers’ efforts to maintain neutrality. The contest’s regulations explicitly prohibit political lyrics and gestures, though enforcement has been inconsistent over the years.
For Slovenia, a country of just over two million people, the decision to boycott reflects broader public sentiment rather than merely governmental policy. Anti-war protests have occurred regularly in Ljubljana, the capital, since the conflict escalated last year.
Media analysts suggest RTV Slovenia’s decision to air Palestinian documentaries during Eurovision represents a significant programming choice that goes beyond mere non-participation. By offering alternative content focused specifically on Palestinian perspectives, the broadcaster is making an explicit statement about where it stands on the conflict.
The boycott also raises questions about potential financial implications for Eurovision and its broadcasters. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes the contest, relies on participation fees and broadcast licensing across the continent. While five countries’ withdrawal will not threaten the event’s viability, it does signal growing fragmentation among European public broadcasters on political issues.
Eurovision has weathered political controversies throughout its 68-year history, from Cold War tensions to regional conflicts. However, this year’s multiple withdrawals represent one of the most significant political challenges the contest has faced in recent decades.
As Vienna prepares to host the competition next month, organizers face the delicate balance of acknowledging the political context while attempting to maintain Eurovision’s stated purpose as a celebration of musical diversity and cultural exchange across Europe.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


6 Comments
Disappointed to hear Slovenia won’t be airing Eurovision this year. While the Israel-Palestine conflict is undoubtedly a thorny geopolitical issue, I worry that boycotting the song contest may do more to divide than unite. Hopefully this doesn’t become a trend and Eurovision can remain a space for cultural exchange.
I can understand Slovenia’s perspective on boycotting Eurovision over Israel’s participation, but I’m concerned this could open the floodgates for more countries to withdraw over political disagreements. Eurovision has always been about celebrating diversity and bringing people together through music. Hopefully this doesn’t undermine that spirit.
I have mixed feelings about Slovenia’s Eurovision boycott. On one hand, I respect their desire to make a political statement. On the other, I worry this could set a dangerous precedent of countries using the song contest as a platform for geopolitical posturing rather than artistic celebration. Curious to see how this plays out.
The Eurovision contest has always been a mix of music and politics. While I understand Slovenia’s stance, I’m disappointed to see them withdraw, as I enjoy the cultural exchange and diversity the competition represents. Hopefully this doesn’t set a precedent for more countries to bow out over political disagreements.
Interesting to see Slovenia boycotting Eurovision over Israel’s participation. It’s a complex geopolitical issue, and I respect each country’s right to make its own decision on whether to participate. Curious to see how this plays out and if other nations follow suit.
I can appreciate Slovenia’s decision to boycott Eurovision in solidarity with Palestine, but I’m concerned this could further politicize the song contest. Eurovision has historically been a platform for cultural unity and celebration – it would be a shame to lose that. Curious to hear others’ perspectives on this.