Listen to the article
The Norwegian Nobel Institute has firmly rejected the suggestion that Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado could transfer or share her Nobel Peace Prize with U.S. President Donald Trump, clarifying that such an action violates the fundamental rules governing the prestigious award.
“Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others,” the institute stated on Friday. “The decision is final and stands for all time.”
The institute’s statement came in response to comments Machado made during an appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity” program earlier in the week. When asked by host Sean Hannity whether she had offered to give Trump her Nobel Peace Prize, Machado responded, “Well, it hasn’t happened yet,” before expressing her desire to share the honor with him.
“I certainly would love to be able to personally tell him that we believe — the Venezuelan people, because this is a prize of the Venezuelan people — certainly want to give it to him and share it with him,” Machado said. “What he has done is historic. It’s a huge step towards a democratic transition.”
Machado’s comments referred to the January 3 operation in which the United States captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who now faces drug trafficking charges in New York. The authoritarian leader’s removal marked a dramatic shift in Venezuela’s political landscape and represented a major foreign policy achievement for the Trump administration.
When asked about Machado’s suggestion during his own “Hannity” appearance on Thursday, Trump acknowledged the offer: “I’ve heard that she wants to do that. That would be a great honor.”
Machado secretly fled Venezuela last month to travel to Norway, where she received the Nobel Peace Prize. During her acceptance, she dedicated the award to Trump, a gesture she elaborated on during her Fox News interview.
“Let me be very clear. As soon as I learned that we had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, I dedicated it to President Trump because I believed at that point that he deserved it,” Machado explained. “And a lot of people, most people, said it was impossible to achieve what he has just done on Saturday, January 3rd.”
The situation highlights the complex political dynamics surrounding Venezuela’s future. Despite Machado’s public support for Trump, the president has previously expressed doubts about her leadership capabilities, stating that she “doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country” to lead Venezuela. Trump has instead backed acting President Delcy Rodríguez, who ironically served as vice president under Maduro before his capture.
The Nobel Peace Prize, established by Alfred Nobel’s will in 1895, is one of the world’s most prestigious honors. The Norwegian Nobel Committee selects recipients based on their contributions to peace and conflict resolution. The strict rules about non-transferability maintain the award’s integrity and ensure that it recognizes specific individuals or organizations for their achievements.
Trump and Machado are reportedly scheduled to meet in Washington next week, potentially offering an opportunity to discuss Venezuela’s political transition following Maduro’s removal. The meeting comes at a critical juncture for the South American nation, which has suffered through years of economic collapse, humanitarian crisis, and political repression under Maduro’s regime.
Analysts suggest that Venezuela faces significant challenges in establishing democratic governance after decades of authoritarian rule, regardless of who ultimately assumes leadership. The international community, particularly the United States, will likely play a crucial role in supporting this transition process in the coming months.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The Venezuelan opposition leader’s comments about wanting to share the Nobel Prize with Trump appear to be more aspirational than realistic, given the Institute’s definitive statement on the matter.
This seems like a misunderstanding or miscommunication. The rules around the Nobel Prize are quite clear – it cannot be shared or transferred once awarded. Curious to see how this plays out.
The denial from the Nobel Institute is unsurprising, as the rules around the Prize are well-established. It will be interesting to see if the Venezuelan leader clarifies or elaborates on her earlier remarks.
Agreed. The Institute’s statement is clear and leaves little room for ambiguity. It will be intriguing to see how this situation develops.
While the leader’s sentiment is understandable, the Nobel Institute is unequivocal that a Prize cannot be shared or transferred after the fact. This maintains the integrity of the prestigious award.
The Nobel Institute’s swift and definitive denial of the rumors highlights the sacrosanct nature of the Peace Prize. It will be interesting to see if the Venezuelan leader provides any clarification on her earlier remarks.
Agreed. The Institute’s response makes it clear that the rules around the Nobel Prize are not open to interpretation or negotiation. Curious to see how this plays out going forward.
Interesting to see the Nobel Institute firmly denying any possibility of sharing or transferring a Nobel Prize. It highlights the prestigious and immutable nature of the award.
This seems like a case of crossed wires. The Nobel Institute has made its position unambiguous – a Peace Prize cannot be shared or transferred. It will be telling to see how the Venezuelan leader responds.
Exactly. The rules around the Nobel Prize are well-defined, so it’s not surprising the Institute moved quickly to dispel any notion of it being shared or transferred.