Listen to the article
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán declared this week that Jewish communities are safer in Budapest than anywhere else in Europe, amid growing concerns about rising antisemitism across the continent.
“Jewish communities are safer in Budapest than anywhere else in Europe. Zero tolerance for antisemitism, no hate crimes, no violent migrants,” Orbán wrote on X. “This is how a modern European capital ought to be.”
His assertion received public support from Israeli Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli, who described Budapest as “one of the safest and most welcoming European capitals for its Jewish community and for Israeli citizens alike.” Chikli cited Hungary’s willingness to host a Zionist Youth Congress of approximately 200 Jewish youths after the Swiss city of Basel reportedly declined to hold the event.
According to Chikli, Hungary’s approach stems from “a responsible immigration policy that recognizes the danger posed by radical Islam” and “an uncompromising government policy against antisemitism.”
These statements come at a time when antisemitism is surging throughout much of Europe. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recently published a 2024-2025 analysis titled “Take Action: Antisemitism Is Escalating in Europe,” documenting a sharp increase in antisemitic harassment, vandalism, threats, and physical attacks across multiple European countries following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza.
The ADL report highlights particular concerns in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, where incidents have risen dramatically. Many European Jews report feeling unsafe wearing visible religious symbols in public, and Jewish institutions across the continent now require heightened security measures. The organization warns that antisemitic rhetoric is becoming increasingly normalized in public discourse.
Hungary is home to Central Europe’s largest Jewish community, with estimates ranging from 80,000 to 100,000 Jews, most concentrated in Budapest. This represents a fraction of Hungary’s pre-World War II Jewish population, which numbered around 825,000. Following the German occupation in March 1944, Hungarian and Nazi authorities deported approximately 430,000-440,000 Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz in a matter of weeks, most of whom were murdered upon arrival. Historians estimate that about 564,000 Hungarian Jews perished during the Holocaust.
Jewish leaders in Hungary have offered varied assessments of the current situation. Some praise the Orbán government for investing in synagogue restoration, Holocaust memorials, and Jewish cultural initiatives, as well as for maintaining strong diplomatic ties with Israel. Critics, however, have expressed concern about nationalist rhetoric and disputes over how Hungary’s role in the Holocaust is remembered and commemorated.
Orbán’s government has consistently rejected accusations of antisemitism, pointing to its close relationship with Israel and public opposition to antisemitic violence. Hungarian officials frequently contrast the situation in Budapest with major Western European cities where Jewish institutions require heavy police protection and where protests related to the Gaza war have sometimes turned violent.
The government’s stance aligns with its broader anti-immigration policies. Orbán has positioned Hungary as a defender of traditional European values against what he describes as the dangers of unchecked migration, particularly from Muslim-majority countries. This approach has drawn criticism from European Union leaders and human rights organizations but has resonated with his domestic political base.
The ADL notes that antisemitic narratives have spread across Europe’s political spectrum and proliferated on online platforms, contributing to a climate of fear even in countries once considered safe havens for Jewish communities.
As Europe grapples with this surge in antisemitism, Hungary’s claim to be a safe harbor for Jews highlights the complex relationship between immigration policies, nationalism, and minority protection that continues to shape political discourse across the continent. The stark contrast between Hungary’s approach and that of Western European nations underscores the divergent responses to both antisemitism and migration that are defining contemporary European politics.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This is a complex issue without easy solutions. While Hungary’s approach may have merit, I’m concerned that it could further polarize the discourse and distract from the need for a more comprehensive, collaborative response to antisemitism across the continent.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific policies and initiatives Hungary has implemented to protect its Jewish community. It would be interesting to see if these could be replicated in other European cities facing similar challenges.
This is an interesting and concerning topic. It’s good to see the Hungarian government taking a strong stance against antisemitism, but I wonder if their approach is truly effective in addressing the root causes of rising hate crimes across Europe.
While Budapest may be relatively safe for Jewish communities, the broader trend of increasing antisemitism in Europe is very worrying. I hope leaders across the continent can work together to find lasting solutions to this complex issue.
You raise a fair point. Addressing antisemitism requires a nuanced, multi-faceted approach that goes beyond just security measures. Fostering greater understanding, education, and social cohesion will be crucial.
The claim that Budapest is the safest European city for Jews is a bold one. I’d like to see more data and independent analysis to verify these assertions, as perceptions of safety can sometimes differ from reality.
That’s a fair point. Objective data and cross-country comparisons would be helpful to better evaluate the situation in Budapest and put it in a broader European context.