Listen to the article
The International Criminal Court confirmed charges of crimes against humanity against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte on Thursday, finding “substantial grounds” to believe he was responsible for dozens of murders during his time in office and previously as mayor of Davao.
A three-judge panel unanimously determined that Duterte, 81, “developed, disseminated and implemented” a policy “to ‘neutralize’ alleged criminals” through deadly anti-drug crackdowns. The decision marks a significant step toward holding the former president accountable for violence that occurred during his 2016-2022 presidency.
Duterte was arrested in the Philippines last year and transferred to The Hague, where he awaits trial. He has denied all charges against him. His defense team expressed disappointment with the court’s decision, with lead attorney Nick Kaufman telling The Associated Press that the ruling “is based on the uncorroborated statements of vicious self-confessed murderers acting as cooperating witnesses.”
According to prosecutors, the killings were carried out by police and hit squad members starting in 2011, motivated by financial gain or fear of becoming targets themselves. “For some, killing reached the level of a perverse form of competition,” deputy prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang told the court during pretrial hearings in February.
The death toll from Duterte’s presidential anti-drug campaign remains disputed. While national police have reported more than 6,000 deaths, human rights organizations claim the figure could be as high as 30,000.
Prosecutors hailed the decision as “a significant milestone” in their pursuit of accountability. The court has not yet set a date for the trial to begin. Duterte has waived his right to appear in court and was not present for any hearings. Last month, judges determined he was fit to stand trial after previously postponing proceedings due to health concerns.
In the Philippines, families of those killed in the anti-drug campaign welcomed the court’s decision. Randy delos Santos, whose nephew Kian was killed by three police officers in 2017, told the AP: “This is for all the victims, who were not even given the chance to be recognized as victims because their stories were twisted in police reports, investigations and findings.”
“Unlike Kian, most other victims were nameless, voiceless and were just numbers and statistics whose horrific stories were never heard. Now the ICC will give their stories a chance to be told,” delos Santos added.
Human rights organizations also praised the court’s decision. Maria Elena Vignoli, senior international justice counsel at Human Rights Watch, said, “Duterte’s trial will send a powerful message that no one responsible for grave crimes is above the law, whether in the Philippines or elsewhere, and that justice will eventually catch up with them.”
The case has faced several procedural challenges. ICC prosecutors first announced a preliminary investigation into Duterte’s drug crackdowns in 2018. Shortly thereafter, Duterte announced the Philippines would withdraw from the court, a move human rights activists characterized as an attempt to evade accountability. On Tuesday, appeals judges rejected a request from Duterte’s legal team to dismiss the case based on the Philippine withdrawal from the ICC.
The case has faced additional complications within the court itself. In October, judges disqualified Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan from the case, citing “a reasonable appearance of bias” because he had previously represented victims of Duterte’s alleged crimes before joining the ICC. Khan had already stepped back from his duties pending the outcome of an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct.
The confirmation of charges signals the ICC’s determination to pursue accountability for alleged human rights abuses in the Philippines despite the country’s withdrawal from the court and represents a significant development in international criminal justice. If convicted, Duterte would be the first former head of state from Southeast Asia to be held accountable by the ICC for crimes against humanity.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
While Duterte’s tough-on-crime approach may have had some public support, the alleged human rights abuses are unacceptable. The ICC has a responsibility to investigate thoroughly and ensure a fair trial, regardless of the defendant’s former position of power.
I agree. No one should be above the law, even former heads of state. The ICC trial will be closely watched to see if justice is served for the victims and their families.
The charges against Duterte are very serious. As a former president, he should be held to the highest standards of conduct. I’m curious to see how his defense team responds to the ICC’s decision and what evidence emerges during the trial.
This is a troubling development, though not entirely unexpected given Duterte’s controversial crackdowns. The ICC must weigh the evidence carefully and ensure a fair trial, while respecting the sovereignty of the Philippines. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
Duterte’s human rights record during his time in office was highly concerning. While the justice process must be impartial, it’s important that victims and their families see accountability for the alleged crimes. This trial could have significant implications for the Philippines and the region.
I agree. Upholding the rule of law and justice for victims is crucial, even for former heads of state. The ICC must conduct a thorough and fair investigation to determine the facts of this case.
This is a significant development in international criminal justice. The Philippines has been a volatile political landscape, and Duterte’s alleged involvement in extrajudicial killings is deeply troubling. A transparent and impartial trial could shed light on the scale and nature of the abuses.