Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Brisbane Councillor Ordered to Apologize for Israel-Palestine Pamphlet Deemed “Propaganda”

A Brisbane councillor must issue a formal apology and reimburse thousands of dollars after an independent review found her newsletter on the Israel-Palestine conflict constituted “propaganda” that could make Jewish community members feel unsafe.

Trina Massey, the Greens representative for the inner-city Gabba ward, distributed a spring newsletter to thousands of Brisbane residents in August last year that included a controversial two-page spread titled “Khalil’s Story,” which purported to outline the history of the Middle East conflict.

The article immediately sparked backlash from constituents who criticized its inflammatory and partisan language. Critics noted that the timeline began with Ottoman rule in the Middle Ages, omitted both the Holocaust and October 7 attacks, and suggested Jewish people were not indigenous to Israel.

“The first emotion was anger,” one resident told independent investigators. “Then it was fear, and concern because it’s pure hate speech. She has a bachelor of arts in history; she knows the timeline of the Middle East hasn’t started in 1516. You could say it was ignorant if it was someone else, but this is intentionally misleading.”

On Monday, Brisbane Council’s ethics committee – comprising three Labor and three Liberal National Party councillors – unanimously endorsed the findings of an independent review conducted by FairFact Consulting Services. The investigation determined that Massey had breached several behavioral standards.

According to the report, the article was “essentially propaganda and a ‘call to arms’ for pro-Palestinian support that is not objective to the rest of the community,” and “could reasonably be expected to make members of the Jewish community feel unsafe, victimised, and targeted.” However, the report rejected other aspects of the complaints and did not characterize the article as antisemitic.

The committee ruled that Massey must publish a public apology in her next ward newsletter and on social media platforms, repay the Brisbane City Council $10,000 – half the cost of the publication – and undertake training and counseling on the code of conduct at her own expense.

The controversy has escalated into a heated public dispute. Brisbane Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner harshly criticized Massey on Wednesday, claiming she used “Hamas talking points” and was “fanning the flames of hatred” contrary to national security advice.

“This is something that agencies like ASIO have warned against,” Schrinner said. “They were warning politicians to tone it down and be careful about their language and not fan the flames of hatred. Not only is this material offensive to our Jewish community… I am genuinely sickened.”

In response, Massey fired back with allegations of defamation against the Lord Mayor. “The LNP lord mayor’s comments today are shameful, defamatory, and are not substantiated by the council’s own report. I reject his claims and am considering my options,” she said in a statement released through the Greens party.

“It is disgraceful that this LNP politician would cynically exploit the nation’s grief in an attempt to silence my community’s strong advocacy for peace. My constituents advocate for peace, and will continue to do so.”

Massey did not personally write the controversial article. Dr. Jamal Nabulsi, an academic and rapper, was paid $2,800 for the 500-word contribution. Despite the backlash, Massey initially defended the piece, stating in a September 2024 social media post: “Some of the information included in my newsletter may be uncomfortable to read, but this is the nature of truth telling. As Australians living on stolen Indigenous land, it’s important that we sit with this discomfort as we challenge our own histories of occupation and invasion.”

Jason Steinberg, president of the Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies, joined Schrinner at City Hall to condemn the newsletter. “This is propaganda… several members have said they don’t feel safe walking in West End,” he stated, referring to a neighborhood in Massey’s ward.

A member of the ethics committee who was not affiliated with the ruling LNP noted that the timing of Monday’s decision was coincidental and unrelated to the recent Bondi attack targeting Jewish people. Massey has previously condemned Hamas and the October 7 attacks, and after the Bondi incident posted on social media: “Jewish people have a right to safety. Antisemitism has no place in our community, and this abhorrent attack is an attack on all of us.”

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. Councillor Massey’s newsletter appears to have lacked nuance and historical context on a complex conflict. While freedom of speech is important, elected officials should be careful not to abuse their platform to spread biased views. An apology and reimbursement seem like appropriate steps.

    • I agree. Public officials have a responsibility to inform their constituents objectively, not push personal agendas. Hopefully this incident will lead to more thoughtful, inclusive communication in the future.

  2. This is a concerning situation. While freedom of speech is important, elected officials must be extremely cautious about how they present sensitive political topics to their constituents. The independent review found this newsletter contained biased, inflammatory content that made some residents feel unsafe. An apology and reimbursement seem like appropriate steps for the councillor to take.

    • Absolutely. As a public servant, the councillor has a duty to inform her constituents objectively, not push a personal or partisan agenda, especially on such a contentious geopolitical issue. Hopefully this incident will lead to more responsible communication in the future.

  3. This is a tricky situation. On one hand, the councillor may have been trying to educate her constituents. But the independent review found the content to be propaganda that made some residents feel unsafe. As an elected representative, she should aim for balanced, fact-based reporting, not partisan narratives.

    • Olivia Jackson on

      Exactly. Even with good intentions, elected officials need to be extremely careful about how they frame sensitive geopolitical issues to avoid causing harm or dividing their community further.

  4. Michael Martin on

    While I appreciate the councillor’s effort to share information, the independent review found the newsletter to contain biased and inflammatory content that crossed the line into propaganda. As an elected representative, she has a responsibility to provide balanced, factual reporting, not push a personal agenda.

    • I agree. Elected officials must be mindful that their platform carries a lot of influence, so they need to exercise great care and objectivity, especially on complex, polarizing topics like the Israel-Palestine conflict.

  5. Noah Rodriguez on

    This seems like a complicated political issue with perspectives on both sides. While I appreciate the councillor’s effort to share information, presenting a partisan narrative as fact could be seen as propaganda. A more balanced, factual approach may have been better received.

    • Robert Thompson on

      You raise a good point. When discussing sensitive geopolitical topics, it’s important to strive for objectivity and avoid inflammatory language that could make people feel unsafe or marginalized.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.