Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Seventh-day Adventist Church in Ghana Denies Endorsing Kennedy Agyapong’s NPP Flagbearer Bid

The Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Church in Ghana has issued a firm denial regarding claims that it has officially endorsed Kennedy Agyapong’s candidacy for the New Patriotic Party (NPP) flagbearer position.

The controversy erupted after members of Agyapong’s campaign team circulated a video on social media showing the politician participating in a prayer session led by an SDA pastor. Campaign supporters presented the footage as evidence of the church’s institutional backing for Agyapong’s political aspirations.

In a strongly worded statement released yesterday, the SDA leadership categorically rejected this interpretation, emphasizing that the video captured only the personal sentiments of the individual pastor involved and should not be construed as representing the church’s official position.

“A recent prayer offered for Hon. Kennedy Agyapong during a visit to one of our events has been interpreted by some as a political endorsement. We wish to clarify that the sentiments expressed in that prayer were pastoral in nature and do not represent an official position of the Church,” the statement read.

The church leadership further clarified their welcoming stance toward all individuals regardless of political affiliation while maintaining strict political neutrality. “As a Church, we welcome all individuals, regardless of political affiliation, to worship and receive prayer. However, we do not endorse, support, or align with any political party or candidate.”

This incident highlights the complex intersection between religion and politics in Ghana, where religious institutions hold significant social influence. Political candidates often seek to leverage religious associations to bolster their credibility among faith communities, which constitute substantial voting blocs in the country.

The NPP’s upcoming flagbearer contest has intensified in recent months, with Kennedy Agyapong, a businessman and current Member of Parliament for Assin Central, positioning himself as a formidable challenger to other party hopefuls. His campaign has gained attention for its populist messaging and provocative style, which has resonated with segments of the electorate frustrated with traditional political approaches.

Political analysts suggest that endorsements from religious organizations could significantly impact the outcome of internal party contests in Ghana’s predominantly religious society. This explains why campaigns might eagerly promote even the appearance of support from respected religious institutions.

The SDA Church, which maintains a significant presence in Ghana with hundreds of congregations across the country, has historically maintained political neutrality in accordance with its global denominational policy. This stance is common among many religious organizations that seek to minister to followers across the political spectrum.

In their statement, the church leadership specifically cautioned political actors against misrepresenting their interactions with religious institutions: “The Seventh-day Adventist Church does not participate in partisan politics. We urge all political actors and their supporters to refrain from using our platforms, messages, or worship experiences for political purposes.”

The church concluded by reaffirming its commitment to serving as “a spiritual home for all Ghanaians and a voice for peace, integrity, and unity,” underscoring its priority of maintaining an inclusive environment that transcends political divisions.

This incident reflects broader tensions in Ghanaian society as the country approaches another election cycle, where religious endorsements—real or perceived—can become contentious political tools. For religious organizations like the SDA Church, maintaining clear boundaries between pastoral care and political endorsement remains a delicate balancing act in Ghana’s vibrant democratic landscape.

Political observers note that as campaign activities intensify ahead of party primaries, Ghanaians can expect similar clarifications from other religious bodies as candidates and their teams seek to claim support from influential institutions across the country.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

9 Comments

  1. Elizabeth E. Hernandez on

    It’s good to see the SDA Church in Ghana quickly addressing and clarifying the false claims about their endorsement of Kennedy Agyapong. Maintaining transparency and avoiding political entanglements is important for religious institutions.

  2. The SDA Church’s statement is a firm and principled response to the false claims of endorsement. Kudos to them for upholding the separation of church and state.

    • William Garcia on

      Yes, the church’s statement makes it clear they will not be drawn into partisan politics, which is commendable. Maintaining that independence is important for their credibility.

  3. Isabella Taylor on

    It’s good to see the SDA Church taking a clear and decisive stance here. Institutional endorsements of political candidates can be very divisive, so I’m glad they shut down these false claims quickly.

    • Agreed, the church’s swift action to clarify their position and distance themselves from any perceived endorsement was the right move. Maintaining neutrality is crucial for religious institutions.

  4. This is a good example of a religious institution proactively addressing misinformation and asserting its political neutrality. The SDA Church’s quick action helps preserve its integrity.

  5. Jennifer Williams on

    This is an important lesson on the need for religious organizations to guard against being co-opted for political purposes, even unintentionally. The SDA Church’s response seems measured and appropriate.

  6. The church’s statement makes it clear that the pastor’s prayer was a personal sentiment, not an official endorsement. Religious leaders should be careful not to be seen as taking partisan political stances.

    • Jennifer B. Thomas on

      Absolutely, the church did the right thing by swiftly rejecting the false claims and asserting its neutrality. Maintaining that separation between church and state is crucial.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.