Listen to the article
The Minerals Income Investment Fund (MIIF) has issued a forceful rebuttal against recent media allegations claiming the organization and its Chief Executive Officer, Justina Nelson, attempted to manipulate its 2024 audited financial statements. In a statement released Monday, the Fund categorically dismissed these reports as “false, malicious, and part of a coordinated smear campaign.”
The controversy stems from several publications with headlines such as “Auditor-General Blasts MIIF for Attempting to Rewrite 2024 Audited Report” and “Auditor-General Blasts MIIF CEO Over ‘Improper’ Request.” According to MIIF, these reports misrepresent the current situation regarding its financial statements.
MIIF clarified that its 2024 Audit Report is currently undergoing standard review procedures with the Office of the Auditor-General, describing these interactions as “professional and cordial.” The Fund emphasized that these discussions aim to ensure the final report accurately addresses all issues identified in the Management Letter, a standard component of the auditing process.
“At no point has the Fund attempted to alter any signed financial statements,” MIIF stated unequivocally in its release.
The sovereign minerals fund claims these negative publications are being orchestrated by “paid and hired” media operatives working at the behest of former executives and board members. According to MIIF, these individuals are attempting to pressure the current management into publishing the financial report on the organization’s letterhead and website before the proper processes are completed.
In a troubling development, MIIF reports that a source connected to those behind the publications delivered what amounted to a threat, indicating the negative media campaign would continue unless the Fund complied with certain demands. MIIF confirmed it has reported this alleged intimidation to appropriate authorities for investigation.
The Fund further alleged that personal agendas are driving some of the negative coverage, including claims that certain former executives seek foreign travel opportunities they believe would materialize once the audit report becomes public. MIIF also noted that some former executives involved in the alleged smear campaign are currently under investigation by Ghana’s Office of the Special Prosecutor, suggesting the media attacks might be attempts to divert attention from these inquiries.
The controversy extends to Ghana’s Right to Information (RTI) tribunal, where proceedings are ongoing after a former board member requested access to MIIF’s audited financial statements. The Fund criticized attempts to “pre-empt the tribunal’s decision with wild commentaries,” suggesting such actions expose the “inconsistencies and bad faith” motivating the negative coverage.
Industry analysts following the situation have advised the public to approach the allegations skeptically, characterizing them as potential distractions from more significant investigations involving former officials.
MIIF was established under Act 978 as Ghana’s sovereign minerals fund with the mandate to maximize the value of the country’s mineral royalties and dividends. The organization plays a crucial role in Ghana’s mining sector, which remains central to the nation’s economy. Gold, manganese, bauxite, and other mineral resources contribute significantly to Ghana’s export earnings and government revenue.
Despite the controversy, MIIF affirmed its commitment to transparency, due process, and responsible management of Ghana’s mineral wealth. The Fund stated it would continue cooperating fully with the Auditor-General while maintaining focus on its core mission despite what it terms “false and orchestrated” attacks.
The dispute highlights ongoing governance challenges within Ghana’s natural resource sector as the country works to enhance transparency and maximize benefits from its substantial mineral endowment.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


7 Comments
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Interesting update on Recent False Allegations Identified as Part of Coordinated Smear Campaign. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.