Listen to the article
A Paris court has convicted ten individuals of cyberbullying French First Lady Brigitte Macron over false claims that she was born a man, highlighting growing tensions between European anti-defamation efforts and free speech concerns.
The defendants, eight men and two women aged between 41 and 65, received penalties ranging from mandatory cyberbullying awareness training to suspended prison sentences of up to eight months. They were found guilty of spreading “numerous malicious comments” that falsely claimed Macron was born male and linked the 24-year age gap between her and President Emmanuel Macron to pedophilia.
Delphine Jegousse, 51, who uses the name Amandine Roy and describes herself as a medium and author, was identified as playing a central role in propagating the rumors after publishing a four-hour video on YouTube in 2021. She received a six-month prison sentence. Meanwhile, social media figure Aurélien Poirson-Atlan, known online as Zoé Sagan, was given an eight-month sentence. His account on X (formerly Twitter) had already been suspended in 2024 following multiple judicial investigations.
Other defendants included an elected official, a teacher and a computer scientist. Several attempted to defend their actions during the trial, claiming their remarks were intended as humor or satire, and expressed confusion about why they faced prosecution.
The French First Lady did not attend the two-day trial held in October but told TF1 national television on Sunday that she initiated legal proceedings to “set an example” in combating harassment. Her daughter, Tiphaine Auzière, testified that her mother had suffered a “deterioration” of her life since the false claims began circulating online, adding, “She cannot ignore the horrible things said about her.”
The Macrons have also filed a lawsuit against American conservative commentator Candace Owens in the United States over similar allegations about the French First Lady.
The case comes amid escalating tensions between the United States and European approaches to regulating online speech. The White House, under the Trump administration, has increasingly criticized European allies for what it characterizes as attacks on free expression. The administration has specifically targeted the European Union’s Digital Services Act, which imposes regulations and potential heavy fines on technology companies including social media platforms, describing it as a censorship mechanism.
In its latest National Security Strategy, the White House has signaled intentions to work with political allies in Europe to dismantle what it sees as excessive economic regulation, speech restrictions, and policies on migration. This represents a more aggressive stance toward reshaping European politics to align with American interests.
The conviction in Paris illustrates the divergent approaches to handling online disinformation and harassment between Europe and the United States. European countries have generally implemented stronger legal protections against defamation and online abuse, while the U.S. has traditionally favored broader free speech protections.
Digital misinformation experts note that cases like this highlight the complex balance between protecting individuals from harmful false claims and maintaining open discourse online. The conviction of these ten individuals marks one of the more high-profile cyberbullying cases involving a public figure in France, where laws against online harassment have been strengthened in recent years.
The legal action by the Macron family also underscores the personal toll that online misinformation can take on public figures and their families. According to court testimony, the impact of these false claims extended beyond the First Lady to affect her entire family, including her grandchildren.
As digital platforms continue to struggle with content moderation and the rapid spread of misinformation, cases like this one are likely to inform ongoing debates about the responsibilities of both individuals and platforms in the digital age.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This case highlights the challenges of addressing online harassment and misinformation while preserving free speech rights. Spreading false claims about someone’s gender identity is clearly a form of malicious targeting, but the legal system must be careful not to overreach in its efforts to crack down on it. Curious to see how this issue evolves.
You make a fair point. It’s a delicate balance, and the courts will need to consider each case carefully to ensure they’re not infringing on legitimate free speech in the name of stopping harassment. Navigating these complex issues in the digital age is an ongoing challenge.
This case raises important questions about the limits of free speech, especially online. While I believe strongly in free expression, deliberately targeting and harassing someone with false claims crosses a line. The courts will need to continue grappling with these difficult issues as technology evolves.
Agreed, it’s a complex balance. Free speech is vital, but not when it’s used as a cover for harassment and defamation. Hopefully this case sets a precedent for holding perpetrators accountable while still preserving the core principles of free expression.
This case highlights the growing tension between protecting individuals from malicious online harassment and preserving free speech rights. While false claims about someone’s gender identity are clearly harmful, the courts must balance the need for accountability with the risk of over-censorship. It’s a complex issue without easy answers.
I agree, it’s a delicate balance. Cyberbullying can have serious consequences, but free speech is also a fundamental right. The courts will need to consider the specifics of each case carefully.
Interesting to see the French courts taking action against this type of online harassment and disinformation. While free speech is crucial, deliberately spreading false and damaging claims about someone’s identity crosses a line. It will be worth following how these issues continue to be navigated going forward.
Spreading false and defamatory claims about someone’s gender identity is a concerning form of harassment. I’m glad to see the French courts taking action to hold those responsible accountable, even if the sentences seem relatively light. Protecting individuals from this kind of malicious online abuse is important.
While I’m glad to see the French courts taking action against this kind of targeted online harassment, the specific sentences seem quite light. Deliberately spreading false and defamatory claims about someone’s gender identity is a serious offense that can have lasting impacts. Hopefully this case sets a stronger precedent for accountability.