Listen to the article
Social Media Hoax Resurfaces: False Claims About Meta’s Photo Rights Circulate on Facebook
A persistent internet hoax has resurfaced on Facebook, with users frantically sharing warnings about a supposed “new Facebook rule” that would allegedly grant Meta ownership rights to users’ photos. The viral message claims the policy would take effect “tomorrow” and encourages users to copy and paste a legal-sounding declaration to protect their content.
The widely circulated message begins with “Big day tomorrow! It’s official. Signed at 8:10am. It was even on TV.” The text goes on to claim that “60 Minutes” and a lawyer advised posting the disclaimer, suggesting that failing to share the message would constitute consent for Meta to use personal photos and profile information.
Some variations of the message even claimed that fact-checkers had verified the warning as true, while others suggested that U.S. Representative Valerie Foushee had shared the warning on her personal Facebook page.
However, these claims are entirely false. Meta has not implemented any such policy change, and the “copy-and-paste” declaration holds no legal authority whatsoever. When users create a Facebook account, they agree to the company’s terms of service and privacy policy – conditions that cannot be altered or overridden by posting a status update.
This type of online rumor, often referred to as “copypasta” – internet slang for blocks of text that are copied and pasted across social media platforms – has a long history dating back to the early days of social networks. Meta itself addressed this phenomenon in 2019, noting that “Copy-and-paste memes — those blocks of text posted on message boards, forwarded in emails and shared via social media — are as old as the internet.”
The current iteration is merely the latest version of a hoax that has circulated in various forms for years. Similar warnings about Facebook or Meta claiming ownership of users’ content have appeared regularly, causing periodic waves of concern among users unfamiliar with the pattern.
Digital literacy experts point out that these hoaxes capitalize on genuine concerns about privacy and data ownership in the digital age. Many users feel powerless regarding how their personal information is used online, making them susceptible to messages that seem to offer some control.
“These viral posts prey on people’s uncertainty about privacy policies and data rights,” explains Dr. Emily Laidlaw, a digital rights researcher at the University of Calgary. “The legal-sounding language and urgent tone create a false sense that immediate action is required, when in reality, these declarations have no effect whatsoever.”
For users concerned about their privacy on Meta’s platforms, experts recommend actually reviewing the company’s privacy settings and terms of service. These documents, while lengthy, outline the actual rights users grant to the company when using their services.
Meta’s current terms of service do grant the company a “non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, and worldwide license” to host content users share, but this license is primarily designed to allow the platform to function as intended – displaying photos to friends and connections – not to claim ownership of users’ content.
This latest viral hoax serves as a reminder of the importance of digital literacy and the need to verify information before sharing it on social media. Users concerned about privacy issues are encouraged to consult official sources or legitimate news outlets rather than relying on unverified warnings circulating on social platforms.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
While I understand the concern around photo rights, it’s crucial we rely on official statements from Meta rather than unverified viral messages. I’ll wait to see if they provide any updates or clarification on their policies before forming an opinion on this issue.
Interesting development with Meta’s photo policy. It’s important to verify claims like this before spreading them, as misinformation can be easily amplified on social media. I’ll be curious to see how Meta responds and if they clarify their actual policy around user-generated content.
I’m curious to know more about the actual policy changes, if any, that Meta is making around user photo rights. As a social media user, I want to understand the implications and how it may impact content I share on their platforms.
This sounds like a typical social media hoax. I’m glad fact-checkers were able to debunk the claims quickly. It’s important to be cautious about viral messages that try to create a sense of urgency or spread misinformation, even if they seem to come from credible sources.
This ‘new policy’ claim sounds like another social media hoax. It’s wise to be skeptical of viral messages that demand urgent action, especially when they include vague claims about lawyers or news coverage. I’ll wait for an official statement from Meta before jumping to any conclusions.
Absolutely, it’s always best to fact-check these types of viral claims before reacting. Spreading misinformation, even unintentionally, can do more harm than good.