Listen to the article
The former presidential spokesperson of the Philippines, Harry Roque, has refuted claims circulating on social media that he was arrested in the Netherlands. Roque clarified that he remains in the European country after being prevented from traveling to Austria due to medical concerns.
“There is no truth to the rumors that I have been arrested,” Roque stated, addressing the false reports that had gained significant traction online. The unfounded claims spread rapidly across Facebook, with one post from the page “Unofficial PBBM News” garnering over 6,300 reactions and 500 shares. Another post by a user named “Tap Wan” received more than 1,000 reactions.
In an interview with One News on November 26, Roque explained that medical complications prevented his planned travel to Austria, where he intended to process his asylum application. “On October 30, I had a major surgery, and yesterday, I had a minor surgery. Both of my doctors issued a certificate stating that I am unfit to fly,” he said in Filipino.
The situation was complicated by conflicting medical assessments. “The Netherlands immigration also has its own doctor who issued me a ‘fit to fly’ certificate,” Roque noted. When asked if he wanted to proceed with the flight despite his concerns, he declined and was subsequently removed from the aircraft. “So there was no arrest,” he emphasized.
Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla has also confirmed there is no verification of Roque’s alleged arrest.
The controversy comes amid significant legal troubles for the former spokesperson. On November 25, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed it had canceled Roque’s passport, along with those of four other individuals allegedly connected to illegal operations of Philippine offshore gaming operators (POGOs).
Roque is currently wanted in the Philippines, facing an arrest warrant issued by an Angeles City court in May 2025 for qualified trafficking in persons charges. Filipino authorities have requested that the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) issue a red notice against him and several others connected to the case.
Responding to the passport cancellation, Roque indicated he would file a motion for reconsideration, challenging the court’s reasoning. “Even if I did not flee after the case was filed against me, the court claims I am outside the Philippines without a valid reason; that my departure from the Philippines and avoidance of Philippine jurisdiction is not justifiable,” he explained.
Roque defended his actions by invoking international human rights principles: “I think that is wrong because the right to seek asylum is a human right… it is my right when I am persecuted because of my political beliefs.”
The former spokesperson’s asylum case has faced complications under European Union regulations. Roque initially applied for asylum in the Netherlands, citing political persecution in his home country. However, he later revealed that Dutch authorities directed him to process his application in Austria instead, in accordance with the EU’s Dublin Regulations, which determine which member state should handle asylum applications. Since Austria had issued Roque’s visa, officials determined it should be responsible for processing his asylum request.
The case highlights the complex intersection of international asylum regulations, diplomatic relations, and national justice systems, as Philippine authorities continue their efforts to have Roque return to face the charges against him.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
I appreciate Roque’s transparency in addressing the rumors and providing his side of the story. It’s important for public figures to be upfront and clear, especially when there are false narratives circulating.
Interesting to hear that Harry Roque has refuted the rumors of his arrest in the Netherlands. It’s good that he’s clarifying the situation and explaining the medical complications that have prevented his planned travel to Austria.
The conflicting medical assessments regarding Roque’s fitness to travel seem to have added an extra layer of complexity to the situation. I’m curious to learn more about the details and the reasons behind the differing opinions.
This case highlights the importance of fact-checking and verifying information, especially in the age of social media where misinformation can spread rapidly. It’s good to see Roque taking a proactive approach to set the record straight.
This is a good reminder to be cautious about unverified claims circulating on social media. It’s important to get the facts straight, especially when it comes to high-profile individuals and potential legal issues.