Listen to the article
President Trump has falsely claimed that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment for endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, calling for the singer’s prosecution based on unsubstantiated allegations.
In a social media post published early Sunday from Scotland, Trump asserted that Democrats “admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.” He further claimed this payment constituted a violation of law and that “Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!”
However, federal campaign spending records tell a different story. The Harris campaign reported a $165,000 payment to Beyoncé’s production company, categorized as a “campaign event production” expense—significantly less than Trump’s claimed $11 million figure. The payment relates to Beyoncé’s appearance at an October 2024 Harris campaign event in Houston.
When previously questioned about the alleged $11 million payment in February, Trump offered only a vague explanation, saying, “Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.” No evidence supporting this claim has been presented.
Both the Harris campaign and Beyoncé’s representatives have forcefully denied the allegation. A Harris campaign spokesperson told media outlets last year that they did not pay celebrity endorsers but were legally required to cover costs associated with their appearances. Beyoncé’s spokesperson called the claim “beyond ridiculous,” while her mother, Tina Knowles, denounced it as a “lie” that was flagged as “False Information” on Instagram.
“Beyoncé did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris’s Rally in Houston,” Knowles wrote in a November social media post.
Fact-checking organizations including FactCheck.org and PolitiFact have investigated the claim, which has circulated among Trump supporters since last year, and found no supporting evidence. The claim originally surfaced as a “$10 million” payment before Trump increased the figure to $11 million.
Legal experts note that Trump’s assertion that paying for political endorsements is “TOTALLY ILLEGAL” is incorrect. No federal law prohibits campaigns from paying for endorsements, though such payments would need to be properly disclosed in campaign finance reports.
The allegations against Beyoncé represent another instance in a pattern of Trump calling for the prosecution of political opponents and their supporters. His Sunday post escalates rhetoric from a May statement where he called for a “major investigation” into celebrity endorsements without explicitly mentioning prosecutions.
The White House has not responded to requests for evidence supporting Trump’s claims. A Harris spokesperson referred reporters to Knowles’ previous denial of the allegation.
Trump’s accusations come as both campaigns intensify their efforts in the final months before the presidential election, with celebrity endorsements playing a significant role in each candidate’s outreach strategy. Political analysts note that such endorsements can help campaigns reach different demographic groups, particularly younger voters.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
21 Comments
Calling for the prosecution of Beyoncé over a non-existent payment is a highly questionable move. Unless credible evidence emerges, this appears to be another attempt to generate controversy without merit.
I agree. These types of unsubstantiated claims only serve to erode public trust. Fact-based reporting is crucial to maintaining integrity in the political process.
Seems like another unfounded claim from Trump. Without any credible evidence, these allegations don’t hold much weight. Fact-checking is important to separate truth from fiction, especially when it comes to political figures and their accusations.
Absolutely. Unsubstantiated claims like this only serve to erode public trust in the political process. Fact-based reporting is crucial to maintaining integrity.
It’s concerning to see continued efforts to spread misinformation, even from high-profile political figures. Responsible journalism that verifies claims is essential to combat the spread of falsehoods.
Agreed. Fact-checking is the only way to hold public officials accountable and ensure voters have accurate information to make informed decisions.
Calling for the prosecution of Beyoncé over a non-existent payment is a highly questionable move. Unless credible evidence emerges, this appears to be another attempt to generate controversy without merit.
I agree. These types of unsubstantiated claims only serve to erode public trust. Fact-based reporting is crucial to maintaining integrity in the political process.
The discrepancy between the reported $165,000 payment and Trump’s $11 million claim is quite stark. Without solid proof, these allegations seem unfounded and politically motivated.
Prosecuting Beyoncé over a non-existent $11 million payment is a pretty absurd idea. Unless Trump can provide solid proof, this just seems like another attempt to stir up controversy without substance.
Absolutely, these types of unsubstantiated claims only serve to erode public trust. Fact-based reporting is crucial to maintaining integrity in the political process.
Prosecuting Beyoncé over a non-existent $11 million payment is a pretty absurd idea. Unless Trump can provide solid proof, this just seems like another attempt to stir up controversy without substance.
Calling for the prosecution of Beyoncé over a non-existent payment is a highly questionable move. Unless credible evidence emerges, this appears to be another attempt to generate controversy without merit.
The discrepancy between the reported $165,000 payment and Trump’s $11 million claim is quite stark. Without solid proof, these allegations seem unfounded and politically motivated.
Absolutely. Unsubstantiated claims like this only serve to erode public trust in the political process. Fact-based reporting is crucial to maintaining integrity.
The discrepancy between the reported $165,000 payment and Trump’s $11 million claim is quite stark. Without solid proof, these allegations seem unfounded and politically motivated.
It’s concerning to see continued efforts to spread misinformation, even from high-profile political figures. Responsible journalism that verifies claims is essential to combat the spread of falsehoods.
Agreed. Fact-checking is the only way to hold public officials accountable and ensure voters have accurate information to make informed decisions.
It’s troubling to see continued efforts to spread misinformation, even from high-profile figures. Responsible journalism that verifies claims is essential to combat the spread of falsehoods.
Seems like another unfounded claim from Trump. Without any credible evidence, these allegations don’t hold much weight. Fact-checking is important to separate truth from fiction, especially when it comes to political figures and their accusations.
I agree, the $11 million figure appears to be fabricated. The actual payment to Beyoncé’s company was much lower and properly reported as a campaign expense.