Listen to the article
Viral Images Debunked: Elephant Rescue Video and Submerged Bridge Not Related to Cyclone Ditwah
Misinformation regarding Cyclone Ditwah’s impact on Sri Lanka has been circulating widely on social media, with two particular visuals gaining significant traction online.
The first visual purportedly shows an elephant heroically rescuing a leopard from rising floodwaters, while the second depicts a partially constructed bridge submerged in water. Both images have been shared thousands of times with captions connecting them to the recent devastation caused by Cyclone Ditwah in Sri Lanka.
However, an investigation into these viral visuals has revealed that neither is accurately represented in these social media posts.
The video of an elephant rescuing a leopard, which has garnered significant emotional responses online, has been confirmed to be entirely AI-generated. Digital forensic experts pointed out several telltale signs of artificial creation, including unnatural movements and inconsistencies in the animals’ appearances that wouldn’t occur in genuine wildlife footage.
“The video exhibits several red flags typical of AI-generated content,” explained digital media analyst Priya Sharma. “The physics of the water movement and the interaction between the animals don’t follow natural patterns you would see in authentic footage.”
The second visual showing a submerged bridge under construction has no connection to Cyclone Ditwah or Sri Lanka. The image actually originated from Hyderabad, India, and was captured in September 2023, months before the cyclone formed. The photograph shows a bridge development project affected by seasonal monsoon flooding, part of a larger infrastructure initiative in the region.
City officials from Hyderabad confirmed the image’s origin, noting that the bridge project has since progressed significantly after the flooding receded.
The rapid spread of these misattributed visuals highlights the growing challenge of verifying information during natural disasters. With social media platforms facilitating instant sharing, emotionally compelling images—regardless of their authenticity—can reach millions before fact-checkers can intervene.
Cyclone Ditwah has indeed caused significant damage across parts of Sri Lanka, with legitimate reports documenting flooding, property damage, and displacement of residents. The Sri Lankan Disaster Management Center has reported that several coastal districts have been severely affected, with emergency response teams working to provide relief to impacted communities.
“During natural disasters, there’s often a surge in both misinformation and disinformation,” noted Dr. Amali Perera, a media studies professor at the University of Colombo. “Some content spreads due to well-meaning people sharing without verification, while other content is deliberately manipulated to generate engagement.”
Climate scientists have pointed out that the increased intensity of cyclones in the region is consistent with patterns associated with climate change. The Indian Ocean has experienced more frequent and severe cyclonic activity in recent years, putting coastal communities at heightened risk.
For those seeking accurate information about Cyclone Ditwah and its impacts, authorities recommend following updates from official government disaster management agencies, established meteorological departments, and reputable news organizations that verify information before publishing.
Social media platforms have implemented various fact-checking mechanisms, but the volume and speed of content sharing during crisis events often outpace these safeguards. Users are encouraged to verify information through multiple sources before sharing, particularly when visuals appear dramatic or unusual.
The case of these viral but misleading visuals serves as a reminder of the importance of digital literacy and critical evaluation of content, especially during emergency situations when accurate information can be crucial for public safety and appropriate response.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


27 Comments
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on Fact Check Recap: Deepfakes, Fake Letter, and Misinformation Around Cyclone Ditwah. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Production mix shifting toward Fact Check might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.