Listen to the article
In a troubling case of digital manipulation, a fake photograph purporting to show former President Donald Trump with his hand on the neck of a young Black girl has been circulating widely across social media platforms in recent days. The image, which first gained significant traction in December 2025, has been definitively identified as an altered version of an authentic 1991 photograph featuring Trump with his daughter Ivanka.
The manipulated image began spreading on December 23 when Instagram user @rabbisgreat posted it with the misleading caption, “FBI didn’t wanted us to see this photo.” The post suggested the picture had been deliberately hidden among newly released FBI case files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The fabricated image quickly proliferated across multiple social media platforms, including Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).
Fact-checkers have confirmed the photograph is a sophisticated fake. The original image, available through Getty Images’ licensing service, shows Donald Trump with his daughter Ivanka at New York City’s Plaza Hotel in 1991. The photographer, Ron Gallela, captured the authentic father-daughter moment that has since been maliciously altered. In the manipulated version, Ivanka has been digitally removed and replaced with an image of a young Black girl.
Digital forensics experts suggest the manipulation was likely created using artificial intelligence image generation tools or sophisticated photo-editing software. Such technologies have made creating convincing fake images increasingly accessible, presenting growing challenges for information verification in the digital age.
This incident occurs amid heightened public interest following the Department of Justice’s December 19 release of a limited set of files connected to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The timing of the fake image’s circulation appears designed to capitalize on this renewed attention and create false associations between Trump and the Epstein case.
The fabricated image represents a concerning example of how misinformation can spread rapidly across social media platforms. Within days, the fake photograph appeared on at least six major social networks, potentially reaching millions of users who may not have seen subsequent fact-checking efforts.
Social media companies have implemented various measures to combat manipulated media, but identifying and flagging such content remains challenging, especially when images spread across multiple platforms simultaneously. The incident highlights the ongoing struggle between rapidly evolving AI-powered manipulation technologies and platform safeguards designed to maintain information integrity.
Digital literacy experts emphasize the importance of critical evaluation when encountering provocative images online, particularly those involving public figures. Telltale signs of manipulation can include unusual lighting, inconsistent shadows, or unnatural positioning—though increasingly sophisticated AI tools continue to reduce these visual clues.
When reached for comment about the origin of the manipulated image, the Instagram user who originally shared it did not immediately respond. The account that first spread the fake image remains active on Instagram as of this reporting.
This incident follows previous misleading claims about the Epstein files, including a fabricated story about FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi allegedly spending nearly $1 million on overtime pay to redact information from the Epstein documents. That claim, like the manipulated photograph, has been debunked by fact-checkers.
As investigations into the Epstein case continue to generate significant public interest, the spread of such manipulated media underscores the need for vigilance when consuming potentially inflammatory content online, particularly as AI tools make creating convincing fakes increasingly accessible to the general public.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This is a clear case of digital manipulation and misinformation. Spreading false images and linking them to sensitive cases is highly irresponsible. We should focus on facts and truth, not sensationalism.
This is a sobering reminder of the power of digital manipulation and the need for robust fact-checking mechanisms. We must be vigilant in our consumption and sharing of online content to maintain a well-informed society.
This is a concerning incident that highlights the need for greater media literacy and critical thinking skills. We must be cautious about the information we consume and share, especially when it involves sensitive topics.
While I’m not a fan of former President Trump, the dissemination of false and manipulated images is unacceptable. We should strive for honest and objective reporting, even on controversial figures.
It’s disheartening to see how easily false narratives can spread online. This case underscores the importance of verifying sources and fact-checking before sharing content, regardless of one’s political leanings.
I’m glad the fact-checkers were able to verify the authenticity of the original photo. It’s important to be skeptical of altered or misleading images, especially those involving public figures. Fact-checking is crucial in today’s digital landscape.
Absolutely. Verifying sources and cross-checking information is key to combating the spread of misinformation. We must remain vigilant and not blindly accept everything we see online.