Listen to the article
Labour’s Immigration Promise Faces Scrutiny as Government Abandons Plans for New Returns Unit
The UK government has decided not to establish a separate immigration returns and enforcement unit, despite making this a key campaign pledge during the 2024 election, according to information obtained by Full Fact through a freedom of information request.
In its election manifesto, Labour promised to “set up a new returns and enforcement unit, with an additional 1,000 staff, to fast-track removals to safe countries for people who have no right to stay here.” This commitment was initially highlighted in a government press release on July 17, 2024, shortly after Labour took office, announcing the creation of a “new returns and enforcement unit” within the Home Office.
However, the Home Office’s Immigration Enforcement Secretariat has now confirmed to Full Fact that ministers decided to enhance existing capabilities rather than establish a separate unit. “Returns and enforcement activity falls to various parts of the Home Office, and in particular to Immigration Enforcement, Visas, Passports, Citizenship and Resettlement Services, Asylum Group and the Border Security Command,” the secretariat explained.
Instead of creating a dedicated unit, the Home Office has “redeployed the equivalent of 1,000 full-time staff from across the department to increase delivery of the Government’s returns and enforcement priorities.” This approach marks a significant departure from the specific election commitment, leading Full Fact’s Government Tracker to rate this pledge as “Not kept.”
Despite the absence of a new specialized unit, immigration returns have increased since Labour formed the government. Between July 1, 2024, and January 31, 2026, 58,539 returns (both voluntary and enforced) were processed – representing a 31% increase compared to the previous 19-month period.
Dr. Mihnea Cuibus, researcher at the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, noted that increased staffing under the current government may have contributed to the rise in returns, but cautioned that it’s difficult to determine how much of this increase results directly from higher resources, “especially since returns numbers were already on an upwards trajectory before Labour was elected.”
Dr. Cuibus also questioned the necessity of creating a new unit to achieve higher return rates, telling Full Fact: “Enforcement resources appear to matter, but we are not aware of any reason to believe that a new unit was necessary to increase returns.”
The timing of the government’s decision to abandon plans for a separate unit remains unclear. Although the July 2024 press release mentioned the new unit, the term “returns and enforcement unit” has largely disappeared from government communications, with one exception being a minister’s response to a written parliamentary question in March 2025.
Full Fact has sought clarification from both the Labour Party and the Home Office regarding the decision not to establish a separate unit as promised, but has not received responses from either.
In separate news, Full Fact has debunked viral social media claims showing purported footage of Dubai International Airport “up in flames.” The widely circulated video actually shows a fire at a market in Ajman, UAE, from August 2020, approximately 12 miles from Dubai airport. While Iranian drone strikes have recently targeted the Dubai airport, causing some damage and fires, the viral footage is unrelated to these incidents.
This misrepresentation is part of a broader trend of misinformation surrounding the Middle East conflict, including numerous miscaptioned videos and AI-generated images circulating on social media platforms.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The decision to enhance existing capabilities rather than establish a dedicated returns unit raises questions about the government’s commitment to its campaign pledge. I hope they can still deliver on their goals effectively.
The government’s backtracking on its election promise for a dedicated immigration returns unit is noteworthy. I wonder if this reflects a broader shift in their approach to immigration enforcement.
This is an interesting development in the government’s immigration policy. I’m curious to learn more about the rationale behind the decision to forego the separate returns unit.
It will be important to see how the government’s alternative approach impacts the overall efficiency and effectiveness of immigration enforcement.
Interesting to see the government backtracking on its election promise for a dedicated immigration returns unit. Curious to learn more about the reasons behind this decision and how they plan to enhance existing capabilities instead.
I wonder if this change in plans will impact the government’s ability to efficiently process immigration cases and removals going forward.
This article highlights the challenges governments face in translating campaign promises into concrete policy actions. I’m curious to see how the government’s revised plans for immigration enforcement will play out.
It will be interesting to monitor the government’s progress in enhancing existing capabilities to handle immigration returns and enforcement.
This is an intriguing development in the government’s immigration policy. I’m curious to learn more about the rationale behind the decision to not establish a separate returns unit as promised.
It will be important to see how the government’s alternative approach impacts the overall efficiency and effectiveness of immigration enforcement going forward.
The government’s backtracking on its election promise for an immigration returns unit is noteworthy. I wonder if this signals a shift in their overall approach to immigration enforcement.
This article highlights the challenges governments face in balancing election promises with practical realities. I’m curious to see how the government will address the need for stronger immigration enforcement without creating a separate unit.
It will be important to monitor how the government’s new approach to immigration returns and enforcement plays out in the months ahead.
The government’s decision to forgo a dedicated returns unit and instead enhance existing capabilities raises questions about their commitment to their election pledge. I hope they can still deliver on their goals effectively.
This article highlights the challenges governments face in translating campaign promises into policy. I’m curious to see how the government’s revised plans for immigration enforcement will be received.
It will be interesting to monitor the government’s progress in enhancing existing capabilities to handle immigration returns and enforcement.