Listen to the article
French MEP to Take Legal Action Over ‘Blacklist’ Allegations
French MEP Virginie Joron has announced plans to pursue legal action against multiple media outlets over claims she was placed on a European Parliament “blacklist,” allegations she firmly denies as “completely false.”
Joron, a member of the far-right Patriots for Europe group and France’s National Rally party, made the announcement via social media platform X, stating she would file complaints for “deliberately disseminating false and defamatory information.” The MEP, who is currently running as a mayoral candidate in Strasbourg, claims the allegations have been weaponized to politically discredit her ahead of the municipal elections.
“The President of the European Parliament has confirmed in writing that no blacklist exists, that I have never appeared on one, and that I am not subject to any ban,” Joron stated. When contacted by Euronews’ fact-checking team, The Cube, Joron’s representatives did not respond before publication.
The controversy stems from a 2021 article published by EUobserver, which reported that Joron was among eight MEPs sanctioned by the European Parliament for allegedly participating in what were described as “fake election-observation trips.” These MEPs reportedly took part in observation missions connected to Russian “electoral processes” in Crimea, the Ukrainian peninsula illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.
According to the European Platform for Democratic Elections (EPDE), a network of election monitoring and democracy NGOs, Joron participated in Russia’s 2020 “all-Russian voting” on constitutional amendments. The EPDE characterized her role as part of a group of foreign politicians serving as politically biased “international experts” rather than independent election observers.
The Cube investigated expense reports related to these allegations and found documentation showing that one MEP, Thierry Mariani, participated in election-observation missions in Crimea in 2020 and Kazakhstan in 2021. According to these documents, Mariani was invited by the Russian Federation’s Civic Chamber and Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which covered his travel and accommodation expenses. No similar documentation was publicly available for Joron.
French broadcaster France Info reported that these eight MEPs were consequently excluded from participating in official EU Election Observation Missions (EOMs) and potentially faced suspension. However, the measure was largely symbolic, as EOMs primarily comprise specialist observers rather than politicians.
The controversy highlights Russia’s alleged tactics to manufacture international legitimacy for its territorial claims. The EPDE accuses Russia of selectively inviting foreign politicians like Joron to act as “international observers” rather than relying on internationally recognized missions such as those organized by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
A source familiar with European Parliament procedures told The Cube that no formal “blacklist” has ever existed, contradicting the allegations Joron is disputing. The source confirmed that Joron is not currently banned from participating in European Parliament-organized observation missions.
Separately, Joron was reportedly included on a Ukrainian sanctions list in 2021 under a National Security and Defence Council decision enacted by presidential decree. Legal analysts suggest this decision was connected to visits to Russian-occupied Crimea, which Ukraine considers a violation of its territorial integrity.
The controversy occurs against the backdrop of increasing scrutiny of far-right European politicians’ relationships with Russia, particularly as the war in Ukraine continues and as European elections approach. The incident also highlights the broader geopolitical tensions surrounding Russia’s ongoing occupation of Crimea and international efforts to either legitimize or condemn Moscow’s territorial claims.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This situation highlights the importance of verifying claims, even when they come from high-profile sources. The European Parliament’s clear denial of a ‘blacklist’ is reassuring, but the broader context around political pressure and potential censorship efforts deserves continued examination.
The alleged ‘blacklist’ claims raise concerning questions about potential political censorship or retaliation within the European Parliament. I’m glad to see the institution pushing back and affirming there is no such list, but the full details remain murky.
Agreed, more clarity is needed here. The denial from the Parliament president is a positive step, but the underlying issues around political influence and accountability deserve close examination.
This is a tricky situation where claims and counterclaims seem to be at odds. While the Parliament’s denial is reassuring, the broader context around political pressure and potential blacklisting efforts is worth digging into further. Transparency is key for democratic institutions.
The European Parliament’s strong denial of a ‘blacklist’ targeting MEPs is a welcome clarification. However, the allegations against MEP Joron still raise concerning questions about potential political interference that warrant further scrutiny. Maintaining trust in democratic institutions is crucial.
The denial from the European Parliament president is a positive development, but the underlying issues raised by the ‘blacklist’ allegations still merit further investigation. Transparency and accountability are essential for ensuring the integrity of democratic institutions.
This is a complex issue with competing narratives. While the European Parliament’s denial of a ‘blacklist’ is an important statement, the underlying allegations of political pressure and censorship efforts deserve close investigation. Transparency and accountability are essential for upholding democratic norms.
It’s good to see the European Parliament strongly denying the existence of any ‘blacklist’ targeting MEPs. Maintaining trust and openness in the democratic process is crucial. However, the allegations against MEP Joron still warrant close scrutiny to fully understand what occurred.
This seems like a complex issue with competing claims. It’s good to see the European Parliament denying the existence of any ‘blacklist’, but the allegations against MEP Joron deserve further scrutiny. Transparency around such matters is important for public trust.