Listen to the article
False Claim Debunked: No Harrison Ford “Up” Live-Action Remake in the Works
Social media was briefly abuzz with claims that Harrison Ford would star in a live-action remake of the beloved Pixar animated film “Up,” supposedly playing the elderly widower Carl Fredricksen. The rumor, which circulated online in November 2023, caught enough traction that numerous Snopes readers contacted the fact-checking organization to verify its authenticity.
After thorough investigation, fact-checkers have confirmed the claim is entirely false. There is no evidence whatsoever that Disney and Pixar are developing a live-action adaptation of “Up” with Ford or any other actor attached to the project.
Comprehensive searches across multiple search engines including Google, Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo revealed no legitimate news coverage of such a high-profile project. Entertainment industry publications, which typically report extensively on major studio announcements, contained no mention of the supposed film. Additionally, the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), which maintains listings for films in all stages of production, had no entry for a live-action “Up” remake.
The source of the misinformation appears to be several artificially generated “trailers” posted on YouTube. These videos contain telltale signs of AI manipulation, including unnatural movement of Ford’s body, strange visual effects, and computer-generated voiceovers that don’t match professional production standards. These fake trailers were likely created using increasingly sophisticated AI image and video generation tools that have become widely available to the public.
This phenomenon of fake movie announcements has become increasingly common in the social media landscape. Content creators often fabricate trailers and movie posters for non-existent films, hoping to generate viral engagement and advertising revenue. The rise of generative AI technology has dramatically increased both the volume and apparent quality of such misleading content.
Industry experts note that a live-action adaptation of “Up” would represent a major undertaking for Disney, which has indeed been converting many of its animated classics to live-action in recent years. However, the 2009 Pixar film presents unique challenges that would make adaptation difficult, including its fantastical premise of a house lifted by thousands of balloons and its CGI-dependent storyline.
Furthermore, Disney typically announces such major projects through official channels with substantial marketing coordination. The company has clear protocols for revealing new adaptations of its valuable intellectual properties, none of which were followed in this case.
This isn’t the first time fact-checkers have needed to address fabricated movie announcements. Similar false claims have circulated about a purported live-action version of “The Simpsons” starring Adam Sandler and a non-existent James Bond film featuring Henry Cavill and Margot Robbie.
Media literacy experts warn that as AI technology continues to advance, distinguishing between genuine and fabricated entertainment news will require increased vigilance from consumers. They recommend verifying announcements through official studio channels or established entertainment news outlets before accepting claims about high-profile film projects.
For now, fans of both Harrison Ford and the animated “Up” will have to content themselves with the original 2009 film, as no live-action remake is currently in development.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


19 Comments
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward Fact Check might help margins if metals stay firm.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.