Listen to the article
Russian Economy Stalls as Growth Plummets to Near-Zero, Signaling Potential Recession
Russia’s economic growth has ground to a near halt, with GDP expanding by just 0.1% year-on-year in November 2025, according to the country’s Ministry of Economic Development. This dismal performance marks the worst economic result since early 2023 and effectively signals the economy’s entry into stagnation.
The industrial sector, which had been the backbone of Russia’s war-driven economic growth over the past two years, has fallen into negative territory for the first time in nine months, contracting by 0.7%. The Center for Countering Disinformation emphasized that this decline cannot be dismissed as a seasonal fluctuation, as manufacturing and industrial output had formally propped up economic indicators throughout 2023-2024.
Even analysts with Kremlin connections are now warning of a sharp increase in recession risks for 2026. These experts acknowledge that Russia’s current economic model has reached its limits. The approach, built on three main pillars – aggressive government spending, import substitution policies, and forced lending – appears to have exhausted its effectiveness.
“Russia’s authorities are deliberately continuing the aggression even when the economic base to sustain it is no longer sufficient,” stated the Center for Countering Disinformation. “Russia’s economy is heading into a dead end. And the longer the Kremlin ignores reality, the more painful the consequences will be.”
The industrial production decline has been widespread across manufacturing sectors. Official statistics show staggering drops in key industries: tractor manufacturing plummeted by over 61%, bulldozer production fell nearly 54%, passenger railcar manufacturing dropped by 50%, and elevator production decreased by more than 37%. The automotive sector has not been spared either, with car production declining by over 34%.
These sharp industrial contractions represent a dramatic reversal for an economy that had seemingly defied Western sanctions through military spending and import substitution efforts. Analysts suggest that initial adaptations to sanctions have reached their limit, while the continued military expenditure is creating unsustainable pressure on public finances.
The Washington Post recently reported that Russia faces serious economic challenges stemming from its prolonged war in Ukraine, with conditions potentially deteriorating significantly in 2026. International sanctions, though initially absorbed by Russia’s economic management, appear to be having cumulative effects that are increasingly difficult to counteract.
The economic slowdown comes despite Moscow’s efforts to present an image of resilience and self-sufficiency. For nearly three years, the Kremlin has pointed to formal growth figures as evidence that Western sanctions had failed to achieve their intended impact. However, the latest data suggests these claims are becoming increasingly difficult to maintain.
Economic experts note that Russia’s reliance on high oil and gas revenues has been undermined by price caps, shifting global energy markets, and Western efforts to reduce dependence on Russian energy. Meanwhile, the diversion of resources toward military production has limited growth in consumer sectors and civilian infrastructure development.
The Center for Countering Disinformation described the situation as a direct consequence of both the war and what it termed the Kremlin’s “managerial inadequacy.” As Russia continues to prioritize military objectives over economic stability, the country faces increasing risks of a prolonged economic downturn that could test the regime’s domestic support.
International observers are closely watching these developments, as Russia’s economic trajectory may influence its strategic decisions regarding the conflict in Ukraine and its broader geopolitical positioning in the coming year.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


27 Comments
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Interesting update on Russian Economy Facing Stagnation, According to Center for Countering Disinformation. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.