Listen to the article
AI-Generated Disinformation Floods Nepal’s Critical Post-Protest Election
AI-generated disinformation has emerged as a major threat to Nepal’s electoral integrity as the country prepares for its first national vote since the deadly 2025 protests that toppled the government. With voting set for Thursday, election officials and digital rights experts are raising alarms about the unprecedented scale of sophisticated fake content circulating on social media platforms.
The election marks a critical moment for Nepal’s democracy following last year’s upheaval, when at least 77 people died during two days of intense protests against government attempts to regulate social media. Those protests, which saw parliament set ablaze, ultimately forced the collapse of four-time Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s government.
“In a country where digital literacy is low, people believe what they see,” said Deepak Adhikari, editor of the independent NepalCheck team. His concerns reflect the particular vulnerability of Nepal’s population to digital manipulation during this pivotal election.
The stakes are especially high as the country’s youth – who were instrumental in the tech-savvy protest movement against corruption and job shortages – are now being targeted by political parties across the spectrum through social media campaigns.
Technology policy researcher Samik Kharel describes the pre-election atmosphere as a “digital battleground” and warns that Nepal lacks sufficient expertise to monitor the flood of machine-generated content. “It is even hard for experts to figure out what is real and fake,” Kharel told AFP.
Social media’s outsize influence in Nepal makes this problem particularly acute. Around 80 percent of the country’s internet traffic flows through social media platforms. According to internet analytics site DataReportal, more than 56 percent of Nepal’s 30 million citizens are online, including 14.8 million Facebook users, 4.3 million Instagram users, and approximately 2.2 million TikTok users.
The election commission has documented widespread circulation of hate speech and deepfake content, including AI-generated videos showing candidates insulting opponents or using obscene language. Information officer Suman Ghimire confirmed that more than 600 cases have been referred to authorities, with approximately 150 handled by police.
In one notable instance, supporters of the ousted premier’s Marxist party shared AI-generated images purportedly showing a massive rally of over 500,000 supporters. However, fact-checkers at TechPana determined the images were created using OpenAI’s ChatGPT, while police reported that fewer than 5,000 people actually attended the event.
Another fabricated video circulated on TikTok appeared to show Nepali Congress party leader Gagan Thapa urging voters to support a rival party. The platform has since removed the video.
External influences are also at play. Ammaarah Nilafdeen of the U.S.-based Center for the Study of Organized Hate noted that posts calling for restoration of Nepal’s deposed Hindu monarchy have circulated widely, “amplified by Hindu far-right supporters in India.” These online “ideological pushes” run counter to “domestic demands for strengthening democratic institutions,” she explained.
Despite the election commission’s ability to impose fines or disqualify candidates, experts say the overwhelming volume of digital disinformation far exceeds officials’ capacity to respond effectively. “Candidates and people close to political parties not only compete to win, but also compete to spread misinformation,” said Basanta Basnet, editor-in-chief of news website Onlinekhabar.
The situation underscores the fragility of Nepal’s democratic institutions following the 2025 protests, which began after the government briefly banned 26 social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and X. During those protests, activists used the Discord messaging app to propose an interim leader, ultimately leading to the appointment of 73-year-old former chief justice Sushila Karki to guide the country toward elections.
As Thursday’s vote approaches, fact-checking organizations warn that the flood of misinformation could damage the “foundation of democracy” by encouraging citizens to make ill-informed electoral decisions, potentially deepening the public’s distrust in democratic processes at a critical juncture in Nepal’s political development.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
22 Comments
The stakes are undoubtedly high for Nepal’s upcoming election, especially with the added challenge of AI-generated disinformation. Safeguarding the integrity of the democratic process will be paramount.
You’re absolutely right. Nepal’s fragile democratic transition makes it all the more important to have robust strategies in place to counter the threat of AI-powered fake content.
Interesting to see how AI-generated disinformation could impact Nepal’s critical election. Given the country’s low digital literacy, this is a real threat to electoral integrity that officials will need to address carefully.
Absolutely, the stakes are high for Nepal’s young democracy. Monitoring and combating AI-fueled fake content will be crucial to ensuring a fair and transparent vote.
The protests that led to the collapse of the previous government were clearly a pivotal moment for Nepal. I’m curious to see how the country navigates this election against the backdrop of those events.
You raise a good point. The political instability and social unrest preceding this vote will make it an even more sensitive and consequential election.
It’s concerning to hear about the scale of AI-generated fake content flooding social media ahead of Nepal’s pivotal election. Robust fact-checking and public awareness efforts will be essential.
You’re right. Nepal’s election officials and civil society groups will need to be proactive and vigilant to ensure this disinformation doesn’t unfairly sway the outcome.
The 2025 protests that toppled the previous government in Nepal underscore just how high the stakes are for this election. Effective measures to combat AI disinformation will be critical.
Absolutely. With the country’s fragile democratic transition, even small-scale disinformation campaigns could have outsized impacts and erode public confidence in the process.
It’s worrying to hear about the threat of AI-powered disinformation in Nepal’s election. Given the country’s history of political instability, this could have serious consequences for the democratic transition.
Absolutely. Nepal’s election officials will need to work closely with tech platforms and civil society to quickly identify and debunk any AI-generated fake content circulating online.
The tech-savvy nature of the 2025 protest movement in Nepal highlights the importance of addressing digital literacy and disinformation ahead of this critical vote. Safeguarding the election’s integrity is crucial.
Agreed. Nepal’s experience with social media-driven unrest underscores the need for a comprehensive strategy to counter AI-generated fake content and preserve democratic processes.
It’s concerning to hear about the scale of sophisticated AI-generated fake content circulating ahead of Nepal’s critical election. Effective measures to combat this threat will be crucial.
Agreed. Nepal’s election officials will need to work closely with tech platforms and civil society to quickly identify and debunk any AI-fueled disinformation campaigns.
Nepal’s experience with the tech-savvy 2025 protests that led to the collapse of the previous government underscores the potential impact of AI-generated disinformation on this pivotal election.
Absolutely. Given the country’s low digital literacy, even small-scale disinformation campaigns could have an outsized influence and undermine public trust in the electoral process.
The stakes are undoubtedly high for Nepal’s upcoming election, especially with the added challenge of AI-generated disinformation. Effective countermeasures will be critical to ensuring a free and fair vote.
Agreed. Nepal’s democracy is still fragile, so protecting the integrity of this election is paramount. Robust fact-checking and public awareness efforts will be essential.
Digital rights experts are right to sound the alarm on AI-generated disinformation. In a country with low digital literacy, this could seriously undermine public trust and the legitimacy of the electoral process.
Agreed. Nepal’s election officials will need robust strategies to identify and counter AI-powered fake content if they hope to protect the integrity of the vote.