Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Dutch public broadcaster NOS announced Tuesday it has ceased all activity on Elon Musk’s X platform, citing concerns over the proliferation of disinformation and hateful content on the social media site.

“The platform no longer fits our vision on how we want to present news on social media,” the state-funded news organization stated in its announcement. NOS emphasized that the “unrestricted” spread of hateful responses and disinformation, including under their own posts, made them “unintentionally help spread” such content.

The broadcaster’s departure from X represents a significant move, as its main account had amassed 2.4 million followers. NOS confirmed it will maintain its presence on other platforms including TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and WhatsApp, suggesting a strategic shift in its digital communication strategy rather than a retreat from social media altogether.

X did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the Dutch broadcaster’s decision.

The move comes amid ongoing controversy surrounding content moderation on X since Musk acquired the platform, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022 for approximately $44 billion. Critics have repeatedly argued that Musk’s self-described “free speech absolutist” approach has created an environment where misinformation and hate speech can flourish with minimal oversight.

Musk has consistently defended his policies as protecting freedom of speech, positioning X as a platform that prioritizes open discourse over content restriction. This stance has drawn both praise from free speech advocates and criticism from those concerned about the societal impact of unmoderated content.

Despite growing concerns about X’s content policies, relatively few major media organizations have completely abandoned the platform. The Guardian, a prominent British newspaper, was among the first high-profile media outlets to leave X in 2023, specifically citing “disturbing content” including racism and conspiracy theories as the reason for its departure.

U.S. National Public Radio (NPR) similarly stopped posting on the platform in April 2023, after being labeled “state-affiliated media” by X—a designation NPR disputed as inaccurate and misleading.

The decision by NOS highlights the growing tension between news organizations’ need to reach audiences on popular social platforms and their journalistic responsibility to avoid contributing to misinformation ecosystems. As a public broadcaster funded by Dutch taxpayers, NOS faces particular scrutiny regarding where and how it distributes content.

Media analysts suggest that departures like these could potentially influence other public broadcasters across Europe to reconsider their presence on X, especially as concerns about disinformation continue to mount ahead of several major elections worldwide.

For X, the loss of established news sources could further complicate its relationship with advertisers, many of whom have expressed concerns about their content appearing alongside controversial material. Major advertisers including Apple, Disney, and IBM have previously paused spending on the platform over similar concerns.

The platform has faced regulatory challenges in the European Union, where the Digital Services Act now requires large online platforms to more aggressively combat illegal content and misinformation or face substantial fines.

As social media continues to evolve as a primary news distribution channel, decisions like the one made by NOS reflect the complex calculations media organizations must make when balancing reach against reputation and journalistic integrity.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

7 Comments

  1. Jennifer Jackson on

    This move by the Dutch public broadcaster is a principled stand in favor of responsible social media practices. It will be interesting to see if other news organizations take similar stances in the face of persistent disinformation concerns on X.

  2. It’s interesting to see a major broadcaster like NOS take this position. While X may remain a popular platform, the lack of effective content moderation is becoming a dealbreaker for many established media outlets. This could be a sign of things to come.

  3. Michael Q. Moore on

    The decision by NOS raises questions about the long-term viability of X as a news distribution channel. If other reputable outlets follow suit, it could further undermine the platform’s credibility and usefulness for legitimate journalism.

  4. Isabella O. Smith on

    This move by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS is understandable given the disinformation and hateful content concerns on the X platform. It’s a strategic shift to focus their digital presence on other more controlled social media channels.

  5. Michael M. White on

    The NOS announcement is a stark reminder of the importance of effective content moderation on social media platforms. Balancing free speech and curbing the spread of harmful misinformation remains a significant challenge for X and other social media companies.

  6. NOS’s departure from X is a significant loss for the platform, especially given their large follower base. It highlights the ongoing challenges Musk faces in balancing free speech with the need to curb the spread of harmful content.

  7. The proliferation of misinformation and toxic responses on X is clearly an issue that reputable news organizations like NOS cannot afford to be associated with. Their decision to exit the platform is a principled stance in favor of quality journalism.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.