Listen to the article
After two decades of legal battles, Visa and Mastercard have proposed a new settlement in their ongoing dispute with merchants over card processing fees, potentially changing how consumers use credit cards at checkout.
The settlement, announced Monday, addresses the contentious “honor all cards” rule that has been a cornerstone of credit card transactions in the United States. Under the current system, merchants who accept Visa or Mastercard must accept all versions of their cards, regardless of the associated costs.
This requirement has frustrated retailers for years, particularly as premium rewards cards like Chase Sapphire Reserve (using Visa Infinite) or Citi Strata Elite (using World Elite Mastercard) have grown increasingly popular over the past decade. These high-tier cards typically charge merchants higher processing fees—for example, a Visa Infinite card can cost merchants 0.15% more than mid-tier Visa Signature cards.
The proposed settlement would allow merchants to discriminate between different tiers of Visa and Mastercard products. This means consumers with premium rewards cards could potentially be declined at checkout if a merchant opts out of accepting higher-tier cards. Alternatively, merchants might pass along the additional cost to customers through surcharges on their bills.
This change places merchants in a difficult position: either accept all cards despite higher fees or reject premium cards and risk alienating wealthier consumers who value earning points on everyday purchases.
The settlement also includes a temporary reduction in swipe fees—a 10 basis point decrease for five years—and would set standard credit card transaction fees at 1.25% of purchase price for eight years. This follows a previous settlement rejected by the judge overseeing the case earlier this year, which sent Visa and Mastercard back to renegotiate terms.
Major retail industry groups have already voiced opposition to the proposal, suggesting it doesn’t adequately address their concerns. Stephanie Martz, chief administrative officer and general counsel for the National Retail Federation, called the settlement “all window dressing and no substance” in a statement.
“The reduction in swipe fees doesn’t begin to go far enough, and the change in the honor-all-cards rule would accomplish nothing,” Martz said. “If the courts can’t fix this, it’s time for Congress to take action.”
Merchant associations have long advocated for congressional regulation of credit card interchange fees, similar to existing regulations for debit cards. These groups argue the current system allows payment networks to charge excessive fees that ultimately increase prices for consumers, whether they pay with cards or cash.
The payment networks, however, view the settlement as a pragmatic solution after nearly 20 years of litigation. A Mastercard spokesperson stated, “We believe that this is the best resolution for all parties, delivering the clarity, flexibility and consumer protections that were sought in this effort.”
The ongoing legal battle reflects the tension between payment networks, which have built lucrative business models around interchange fees, and merchants who consider these fees a significant operational burden. Consumers often find themselves caught in the middle, benefiting from rewards while potentially facing higher prices or inconveniences at checkout.
The settlement specifically involves only Visa and Mastercard’s payment networks. American Express, which operates a closed-loop system where it functions as both the issuing bank and payment network, is not involved in this litigation. Additionally, the settlement does not affect debit card transactions, which are already subject to different regulations.
As the settlement awaits final approval, both merchants and payment networks will be watching closely to see whether this proposal finally resolves one of the longest-running disputes in the financial services industry.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This seems like a balanced compromise, allowing merchants to manage their costs while still giving consumers the option to use premium cards. The impact will likely vary by industry and merchant.
Agreed. It will be important for merchants to communicate their card acceptance policies clearly to avoid confusion at checkout.
This is an interesting development in the ongoing battle over credit card fees. It will be important for both merchants and consumers to understand the implications and adapt accordingly.
As a consumer, I’m curious to see how this affects my ability to use my rewards cards. I hope merchants will still accept them widely, but understand the need to control processing costs.
Same here. Maintaining the flexibility to use rewards cards is important, but merchants also need to manage their expenses. It’s a delicate balance.
Interesting development in the long-running card processing fees dispute. This could give merchants more flexibility, but may also lead to more declined transactions for premium rewards cards. Curious to see how it plays out for both sides.
That’s a good point. Consumers who rely on rewards cards may need to carry a backup option if their preferred card is not accepted at a particular merchant.
The growth of high-fee rewards cards has been a sore point for many merchants. This settlement could help level the playing field, but may also inconvenience some consumers. Time will tell how the market adapts.