Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

International Maritime Organization Chief Pushes Forward on Shipping Emissions Regulations Despite Setbacks

The head of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) reaffirmed his commitment to advocating for global shipping regulations aimed at reducing fossil fuel dependency, despite significant opposition from the United States and Saudi Arabia that blocked new rules last month.

Speaking at a side event during the United Nations climate negotiations in Belém, Brazil, IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez emphasized that efforts to establish a framework for decarbonizing the shipping industry will continue despite the recent setback.

“Don’t think the IMO stops there, because we don’t,” Dominguez told attendees gathered near the edge of the Brazilian Amazon. “We need to learn from this experience, these circumstances.”

The regulations, known as the “Net-Zero Framework,” would have established the first global carbon fee on shipping. The framework had initially received agreement in April, with formal adoption expected last month. However, under pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who described it as a “global green new scam tax on shipping,” along with Saudi Arabia and several other nations, delegates postponed the decision for a year.

The proposed regulations included a marine fuel standard that would gradually reduce allowable greenhouse gas emissions from shipping fuels. Additionally, they would implement a pricing system imposing a minimum fee of $100 for every ton of greenhouse gases emitted by ships above permitted limits.

This delay represents a significant hurdle for global climate efforts, as shipping emissions have grown to approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions over the past decade due to expanding international trade. Most commercial vessels currently operate on heavy fuel oil, which releases substantial carbon dioxide and other pollutants when burned.

Industry experts emphasize the urgency of action, noting that large ships typically have a 25-year operational lifespan, meaning investments and changes are needed immediately to achieve meaningful emissions reductions. The International Chamber of Shipping, representing over 80% of the world’s merchant fleet, had advocated for adopting these regulations.

Despite the postponement, Dominguez maintained an optimistic outlook, stating that progress continues on developing the shipping fee framework. He notably refrained from criticizing the United States or other countries that opposed the new regulations, acknowledging the current “volatile” global political climate.

“I will go to everyone to engage proactively, in a fair manner, to work with all the member states and sectors that need to be part of the decarbonization,” Dominguez said. “Shipping is not going to decarbonize on its own.”

Prince Jaime de Bourbon de Parme, climate envoy for the Netherlands, expressed disappointment over the delay but emphasized the importance of moving forward constructively. Speaking after Dominguez, he noted that the Netherlands and numerous other countries had been prepared to adopt the regulations in London last month and had expected to celebrate this achievement at COP30.

“We see its merits for addressing greenhouse gases and contributing to a just and equitable transition,” the Dutch envoy said. “We also continue to work constructively with all interested parties to overcome the barriers for its adoption next year.”

The United States is conspicuously absent from the current climate conference, joining only San Marino, Afghanistan, and Myanmar as non-participants. This absence further complicates global climate cooperation efforts, particularly in sectors requiring international coordination like shipping.

During the IMO side event, Andrew Forrest of Fortescue, an Australian green technology, energy, and metals company, emphasized that pollution-free shipping is achievable. “We’re not woke, we’re not green,” Forrest stated. “We’re a bunch of very pragmatic scientists and business people who are switching off fossil fuels.”

The shipping industry’s decarbonization efforts represent a critical component of global climate action, with implications for international trade, supply chains, and emissions reduction targets. As the IMO continues to advocate for regulatory frameworks, the outcome of next year’s deliberations will significantly impact the pace and scale of the maritime sector’s transition away from fossil fuels.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

17 Comments

  1. Mary I. Williams on

    As a major contributor to global emissions, the shipping industry needs to be part of the solution. I’m glad to see the IMO taking a proactive approach, even in the face of political resistance. Curious to see how the COP30 discussions unfold.

    • Elizabeth Jackson on

      Absolutely. Decarbonizing the shipping sector is essential for a sustainable future. I hope the IMO can find a way to move forward that balances environmental and economic concerns.

  2. Decarbonizing the shipping industry is an important step in the fight against climate change. I’m glad to see the IMO pushing for a global carbon fee, despite the political resistance. Curious to see how the COP30 discussions unfold on this issue.

  3. Jennifer Johnson on

    Establishing a global carbon fee for shipping seems like a sensible step to incentivize the industry’s transition. Kudos to the IMO for persisting despite resistance from some nations. Curious to see how the negotiations at COP30 unfold on this issue.

    • The US and Saudi Arabia’s objections are not surprising, given their fossil fuel interests. But the IMO is right to keep pushing for meaningful climate action in the shipping sector.

  4. Reducing emissions in the shipping sector is crucial for meeting climate goals. While the pushback from the US and Saudi Arabia is not surprising, I hope the IMO can find a way forward that works for all stakeholders.

  5. Establishing a global carbon fee for shipping is a sensible step, and I’m glad the IMO is pushing for it despite the pushback. Reducing the industry’s environmental impact is crucial, and I hope the COP30 negotiations can lead to a workable solution.

  6. Elizabeth Hernandez on

    Emissions regulations for global shipping are long overdue. I’m glad the IMO is taking the lead, even in the face of political opposition. Reducing the industry’s carbon footprint is crucial for meeting climate goals.

  7. The shipping industry’s dependence on fossil fuels is a major concern. I hope the IMO can find a workable solution that balances environmental needs with economic realities. Curious to see how the COP30 discussions unfold on this issue.

    • Patricia L. Williams on

      Agreed. It will be a delicate balance, but the IMO seems committed to making progress. Decarbonizing the shipping sector is essential for a sustainable future.

  8. The shipping industry’s environmental impact is significant, so I’m encouraged to see the IMO taking a proactive stance on emissions regulations. Curious to see how the debate unfolds at COP30 and whether a compromise can be reached.

    • Absolutely. Shipping is a critical part of the global economy, so finding the right balance between environmental concerns and economic realities will be key.

  9. Michael Jackson on

    The shipping industry’s reliance on fossil fuels is a major concern, so I’m encouraged to see the IMO taking action. While the opposition from the US and Saudi Arabia is not surprising, I hope the IMO can find a way to make progress on emissions regulations.

    • Agreed. The shipping sector needs to be part of the global effort to address climate change. I’m hopeful the IMO can find a balanced approach that works for all stakeholders.

  10. Oliver K. Thomas on

    Interesting development on shipping emissions regulations. While pushback from some countries is expected, I’m glad the IMO is committed to pursuing decarbonization measures for the industry. Transitioning to cleaner operations is crucial for the environment.

    • Lucas Rodriguez on

      Agreed. Shipping is a major source of emissions that needs to be addressed. I hope the IMO can find a balanced approach that works for all stakeholders.

  11. William Martin on

    While opposition from some nations is expected, I’m glad the IMO is pushing forward with efforts to regulate shipping emissions. A global carbon fee could be an effective tool to drive the industry’s transition to cleaner technologies.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.