Listen to the article
U.S. Center for SafeSport Reopens Cases After Audit of Former Investigator Accused of Sex Crimes
An external audit of cases handled by a former U.S. Center for SafeSport investigator has prompted the agency to reopen three investigations amid concerns about the investigator’s professional conduct and criminal allegations against him.
The audit, released Monday, examined 114 cases managed by Jason Krasley, a former Pennsylvania police officer who was fired from SafeSport in November 2024 after his arrest for allegedly stealing drug money during his previous law enforcement career. The 17-page report, compiled by Aleta Law over 11 months, revealed troubling patterns in Krasley’s conduct while working for the agency.
While Krasley largely conducted himself professionally during investigations, several individuals interviewed during the audit reported that he “utilized an informal interview style that felt ‘overly familiar,'” according to the report. The audit specifically noted instances where Krasley communicated “with parties outside of business hours, in an overly familiar manner, and about topics unrelated to their cases.”
These findings align with previous reporting by the Associated Press, which documented similar complaints from people who interacted with the former investigator. Some reported conversations with Krasley that would last for hours and frequently diverge into personal topics unrelated to their cases.
Krasley’s employment at SafeSport, the congressionally established watchdog organization created to combat sexual abuse in American sports, came under intense scrutiny following his legal troubles. In January 2025, Krasley was arrested on charges of rape, sexual assault, and involuntary sexual servitude for alleged incidents that occurred during his time as a police officer from 2011-2018. Krasley has denied these allegations.
The case triggered pointed inquiries from Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who sent a series of letters to SafeSport questioning the hiring process that allowed Krasley to join the organization despite his background. The scandal ultimately contributed to organizational changes at SafeSport, including the departure of CEO Ju’Riese Colon in April 2025.
In response to the controversy, SafeSport commissioned the external audit in February 2025 and has since implemented stronger hiring policies. The center provided Aleta Law with full access to all cases Krasley handled during his tenure. Though only 12 individuals agreed to be interviewed for the audit, SafeSport has encouraged others who worked with Krasley to contact the center directly to discuss whether their cases should be reopened.
Beyond the three cases already sent to a separate external firm for reinvestigation, the center identified two additional matters requiring further examination “based on new information obtained outside the scope of the audit.”
The audit produced 12 policy recommendations, many of which SafeSport had already begun implementing over the past 18 months in response to feedback about its operations. One key recommendation advised investigators to avoid using unrecorded phone calls for substantive interviews with parties and witnesses.
SafeSport also engaged The Assist (formerly Army of Survivors) to help reach out to individuals who had contact with Krasley. This organization recommended establishing clearer boundaries for investigators, including ensuring “private and informal mechanisms are not used.”
“Not having concrete boundaries in place erodes essential ethical boundaries associated with investigations and can lead to grooming (which is the deliberate and deceptive process used by persons who cause harm to build trust and an emotional connection with another person),” The Assist stated in their recommendations.
The Krasley case has highlighted significant concerns about vetting procedures at the organization entrusted with protecting athletes from abuse. As SafeSport works to rebuild trust, the implementation of more rigorous hiring practices and clearer investigative protocols will be closely watched by Congress, sports governing bodies, and the athletes the center was established to protect.
The center’s willingness to commission an independent audit and make structural changes represents an acknowledgment of the serious lapses that allowed Krasley to investigate abuse cases despite his problematic background.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
While it’s good to see SafeSport taking steps to address these issues by reopening cases, the extent of the problems highlighted in the audit report is very concerning. The organization clearly has work to do in strengthening its investigative processes and ensuring the integrity of its staff.
Absolutely. SafeSport must urgently review its entire investigative unit and implement robust reforms to rebuild public trust. Protecting athletes has to be the top priority, which means zero tolerance for any unprofessional or unethical conduct by its personnel.
Allegations of misconduct and criminal behavior against a SafeSport investigator are extremely troubling. The reopening of 3 cases highlights the need for rigorous auditing and accountability measures. Rebuilding public trust in the organization will be crucial going forward.
Troubling to see these allegations against the former SafeSport investigator. Reopening 3 out of 114 cases is concerning, especially given the findings of unprofessional conduct. Hopefully this leads to a thorough review of all cases handled by this individual.
Agreed, the report highlights some serious issues that need to be addressed. Proper oversight and accountability are crucial for an organization tasked with protecting athletes.
The audit findings on the former SafeSport investigator are deeply disappointing. Allegations of inappropriate behavior and potential criminal conduct are extremely troubling, especially given the sensitive nature of the cases. This underscores the critical need for strong oversight and accountability.
The audit findings on the former investigator’s inappropriate communication and interview style are quite alarming. Allegations of criminal conduct are even more disturbing. Reassuring that they are taking steps to reopen key cases, but this is clearly a major setback for SafeSport.
Yes, this is a major blow to public trust in SafeSport. They need to ensure proper vetting and training of all investigators going forward to prevent such issues from recurring.
This is a major setback for SafeSport and the confidence in their investigative process. The report’s findings of unprofessional conduct and potential criminal activity by a former investigator are very concerning. Thorough reviews and reforms are clearly needed to restore integrity.
Agreed. SafeSport must take swift action to address these issues and implement robust safeguards to prevent similar problems in the future. The stakes are too high for anything less than the highest standards of professionalism and ethics.
This audit raises serious red flags about SafeSport’s former investigator and the need for improved oversight. Reopening just 3 out of 114 cases is worrying, and the findings of inappropriate behavior and potential criminal activity are extremely disturbing. Significant changes are clearly required to restore confidence.
It’s concerning to see these issues with SafeSport’s former investigator, especially given the sensitive nature of the cases they handle. The report raises serious questions about their oversight and screening processes. Hopefully this leads to positive reforms to strengthen the organization.