Listen to the article
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has launched a federal political action committee called “Small Town PAC,” drawing immediate criticism from conservatives who question his credibility with rural voters. The PAC, first reported in Politico Playbook, aims to “organize in places too many people have given up on” according to Walz.
“If Democrats want to win in more places, we’ve got to start showing up in more places,” Walz wrote on his X account, signaling his intention to focus on rural outreach that has traditionally been challenging territory for Democrats.
The timing of this political venture comes just four months after Walz decided not to seek re-election as governor amid mounting pressure over a massive fraud scandal in Minnesota’s childcare subsidy program. The scandal, which involved hundreds of millions in taxpayer funds allegedly misappropriated through fraudulent daycare operations, has been a significant political liability for his administration.
Conservatives quickly pounced on Walz’s new initiative, with many pointing to what they see as hypocrisy in his rural outreach efforts. During his vice-presidential campaign alongside Kamala Harris in 2024, Walz was frequently criticized for what opponents called an inauthentic attempt to connect with rural voters by emphasizing his blue-collar background and hunting experience.
Minnesota Republican gubernatorial candidate and State Representative Kristin Robbins was among those dismissing Walz’s new effort, posting on X: “Small towns across Minnesota loathe @Tim_Walz. He infamously disparaged them as @RocksAndCowsHQ and his left-wing policies are opposed by most!”
The reference to “rocks and cows” stems from a controversial comment Walz made during a previous campaign that was interpreted as dismissive of rural areas, a remark that has followed him throughout his political career.
Daniel Turner, Executive Director of Power the Future, added to the criticism, writing that “small town America hates everything you stand for: open borders, trans insanity, defund the police, rampant crime, Somali fraud.”
In announcing his PAC, Walz took aim at former political rival Vice President JD Vance, stating: “Republicans like JD Vance like to portray their small-town neighbors as petty, resentful, and small-minded. I disagree. I think the problem facing small towns are Republicans like JD Vance.”
Vance’s office quickly responded with a reference to the childcare fraud scandal: “The problem facing many small towns in Minnesota is that Tim Walz gives their money to fraudulent daycares.”
The exchange highlights the ongoing tension between Democrats seeking to rebuild their rural support and Republicans who have increasingly consolidated power in these areas. Rural voters, once a more divided constituency, have shifted significantly toward Republicans in recent election cycles, particularly in the Midwest.
The Small Town PAC’s website indicates that after leaving office at the end of the year, Walz plans to work with Democrats to “build the future” by “investing in people with fresh ideas, energy, and integrity” to “strengthen the Democratic Party from the ground up.”
Political analysts note that Democrats have been struggling to reconnect with rural voters across the country, losing ground in these areas even in traditionally blue states. The 2024 presidential election continued this trend, with many rural counties shifting further toward Republican candidates.
For Walz, the PAC represents an attempt to maintain his national profile after a brief stint in the national spotlight as Harris’s running mate. Whether his approach will resonate with the very voters who have increasingly turned away from Democratic candidates remains to be seen, especially as he faces lingering questions about his administration’s oversight failures in Minnesota.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
Interesting move by Walz to launch a rural-focused PAC, but the timing is questionable given the childcare fraud scandal. Will this really resonate with rural voters, or is it just political posturing?
Agreed, the scandal seems to undermine his credibility on rural issues. It will be important to see if he can genuinely connect with those communities.
This PAC launch seems like a defensive move by Walz to shore up his rural support ahead of potential political challenges. But the fraud scandal will be hard to overcome.
Agreed, the timing and context around this PAC raise some red flags. Walz will need to do more than just set up a new organization to regain the trust of rural voters.
I’m curious to learn more about Walz’s strategy and vision for this PAC. Reaching out to rural voters is important, but he’ll need to address the fraud allegations head-on to build trust.
Valid point. Transparency and accountability will be key if he wants this PAC to be taken seriously by rural communities.
The ‘Small Town PAC’ name is an interesting choice. I wonder if it’s meant to convey a sense of connection with rural voters or if it’s just political branding.
Good question. The name could be seen as either sincere or just a clever marketing tactic. Time will tell if it’s backed by genuine outreach efforts.
The ‘Small Town PAC’ name could be seen as a bit patronizing. I hope Walz’s approach is more substantive than just trying to rebrand himself as a rural champion.
Good point. Walz will need to back up the branding with concrete policy proposals and engagement if he wants to make inroads with rural voters.
Launching a PAC focused on rural outreach is an interesting strategy, but Walz’s record on those issues will be heavily scrutinized. He has his work cut out for him.
Absolutely. Walz will need to demonstrate a genuine, long-term commitment to rural communities if he wants this PAC to be seen as anything more than a political ploy.