Listen to the article
Congressman Demands Release of Trump-Saudi Call Following Khashoggi Murder
Rep. Eugene Vindman, Democrat from Virginia, has called on President Donald Trump to release transcripts of a 2019 phone call with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that followed the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Standing alongside Khashoggi’s widow, Hanan Elatr Khashoggi, Vindman argued that both the family and American people deserve transparency about what was discussed.
“When the president sidelined his own intelligence community to shield a foreign leader, America’s credibility was at stake,” Vindman said during a Friday press conference outside the U.S. Capitol. The congressman, a retired Army colonel who previously served on Trump’s National Security Council, compared the significance of this call to Trump’s controversial 2019 conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that led to his first impeachment.
Vindman’s demand comes at a politically charged moment, as the Trump administration has recently formalized a significant upgrade in U.S.-Saudi relations. During bin Salman’s White House visit, Trump designated Saudi Arabia as a major non-NATO ally, a formal status that streamlines defense cooperation and expedites arms sales.
The meeting yielded substantial outcomes for both nations. Saudi Arabia pledged nearly $1 trillion in new investments across American industries, including infrastructure, artificial intelligence, and clean energy. A Strategic Defense Agreement was also announced, involving purchases of F-35 fighter jets, approximately 300 Abrams tanks, and advanced missile defense systems, along with joint manufacturing ventures in Saudi Arabia.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted the economic benefits, stating: “The U.S.-Saudi friendship is now a partnership for the future. President Trump’s historic agreements with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from defense to investment, will create quality jobs for Americans and will grow our economy.”
However, the deepening relationship has faced criticism over unresolved human rights concerns. A 2021 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded that bin Salman approved the operation to “capture or kill” Khashoggi, who was murdered inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018. Although bin Salman has consistently denied ordering the killing, he acknowledged in 2019: “It happened under my watch, I take full responsibility as a leader.”
During the White House visit, reporters questioned bin Salman about both Khashoggi’s murder and Saudi Arabia’s alleged connections to the September 11 attacks—a rare moment of public pressure for the crown prince.
Trump interjected when a reporter raised Khashoggi’s killing, saying, “A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about. Whether you like him or don’t like him, things happen, but he knew nothing about it… We can leave it at that. You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that.”
Bin Salman described the killing as “a huge mistake” and “painful for us in Saudi Arabia,” adding, “We’ve improved our system to be sure that nothing happens like that again.”
The Saudi leader also drew controversy when addressing Saudi nationals’ involvement in the 9/11 attacks, saying Osama bin Laden “used Saudi people in that event for one main purpose: to destroy the American-Saudi relationship.”
This statement angered 9/11 victims’ families. Brett Eagleson, president of 9/11 Justice, responded: “The Saudi crown prince invoking Osama bin Laden this afternoon in the White House does not change the fact that a federal judge in New York ruled a few short months ago that Saudi Arabia must stand trial for its role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks that murdered 3,000 of our loved ones.”
In August 2025, U.S. District Judge George B. Daniels allowed a lawsuit against Saudi Arabia to proceed, citing evidence of Saudi officials allegedly providing support to the hijackers. Saudi Arabia has consistently denied any involvement, calling such allegations “categorically false.”
For many observers, the strengthening U.S.-Saudi partnership represents a familiar tension in American foreign policy—balancing strategic economic and security interests against human rights concerns and accountability for past actions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
This is a complex geopolitical issue without easy answers. While transparency is important, the administration may have national security reasons for keeping the transcript private. Ultimately, the public deserves to understand the reasoning behind these high-level decisions.
That’s a fair point. There could be sensitive information or strategic considerations that warrant keeping the details private. However, the administration should still make a compelling case for withholding the transcript rather than simply denying access.
Transparency around this Trump-MBS call is certainly warranted, given the Khashoggi murder and the broader implications for US-Saudi relations. Vindman makes a fair point in comparing it to the Zelenskyy call that led to impeachment.
I agree, the public deserves to know what was discussed, especially with such serious consequences at stake. Shedding light on these high-level diplomatic exchanges is crucial for accountability.
Vindman’s call for releasing the Trump-MBS transcript is a reasonable request, but it’s important to balance transparency with protecting sensitive national security information. The public has a right to know, but there may be valid reasons for keeping some details confidential.
I agree that a balanced approach is needed. Transparency is critical for accountability, but the administration may have legitimate concerns about disclosing certain details. The key is finding a way to provide the public with as much information as possible without compromising sensitive matters.
The upgrade in US-Saudi relations is concerning, given Saudi Arabia’s poor human rights record. Vindman is right to demand transparency around the Trump-MBS call and its role in shaping this strategic partnership.
Absolutely. Strengthening ties with Saudi Arabia without addressing their history of abuses is a troubling move. The public needs more information to understand the administration’s reasoning and priorities.
As a retired military officer, Vindman’s perspective on this issue carries a lot of weight. His call for releasing the Trump-MBS transcript is a meaningful step towards accountability and rebuilding trust in US foreign policy.
I agree, Vindman’s background and experience lend credibility to his demand. Shedding light on this call could provide important context around the administration’s handling of the Khashoggi murder and the broader US-Saudi relationship.