Listen to the article
Vice President Vance Clashes with Oregon AG Over $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Vice President JD Vance has engaged in a public dispute with Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield over the Trump administration’s recent policy imposing a $100,000 fee for H-1B skilled-worker visas, telling the Democratic official to “try hiring Americans” instead.
The confrontation began after Rayfield announced that Oregon is leading a coalition of 19 states in a lawsuit challenging the new fee structure. The legal challenge alleges the administration’s dramatic fee increase—from the previous range of $960 to $7,600—exceeds executive authority and violates the Administrative Procedure Act by bypassing the standard notice-and-comment process.
President Trump ordered the Department of Homeland Security in September to restrict decisions on new H-1B visa petitions for applicants outside the United States for one year. The order allows current visa holders to seek renewals under the previous, lower-cost framework.
Responding to Rayfield’s announcement on social media, Vance dismissed the lawsuit with a terse suggestion: “You might try hiring Americans.” He later expanded his criticism, characterizing the situation as “instructive” of why visa reform matters.
“While I know there are many people in our coalition who – rightly — are angry about immigration fraud in our visa system, ‘America Last’ Republicans and Democrats are teaming up to stop our efforts to address these issues,” Vance wrote. “Don’t black pill. Fight back.”
The dispute highlights the fundamental differences in how the administration and its critics view the H-1B program. Rayfield’s lawsuit argues the visa system is essential for Oregon’s educational institutions to recruit specialized talent, including physicians, researchers, and nurses. His office warned that the new fee “would make it nearly impossible for these institutions to hire the experts they need.”
“Oregon’s colleges, universities and research institutions rely on skilled international workers to keep labs running, courses on track and innovation moving forward,” Rayfield said in a statement. “This enormous fee would make it nearly impossible for these institutions to hire the experts they need, and it goes far beyond what Congress ever intended. This threatens Oregon’s ability to compete, educate, and grow.”
The Trump administration has taken a markedly different stance. When announcing the original order, the White House stated that the H-1B program was “created to bring temporary workers into the United States to perform additive, high-skilled functions, but has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.”
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has voiced similar concerns, previously calling the H-1B system a “scam” that is “used to import cheap foreign labor at the expense of Americans.”
The lawsuit has attracted support from states across the political spectrum. Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings joined the legal challenge, characterizing Trump’s order as an “unserious idea that threatens a deeply serious crisis.”
The H-1B visa program has long been a point of contention in American immigration policy. Tech companies and research institutions have generally advocated for the program, arguing it allows them to recruit highly specialized talent not readily available in the domestic workforce. Critics contend the program has been abused by companies seeking to reduce labor costs by importing foreign workers at lower wages.
The lawsuit’s outcome could have significant implications for America’s technology sector, research institutions, and international competitiveness. Many major tech companies like Amazon and Microsoft rely heavily on the H-1B program to fill specialized positions, particularly in computer science and engineering.
As the legal battle unfolds, the administration appears committed to its position that American workers should be prioritized in hiring practices—a stance that aligns with Trump’s broader “America First” policy approach to immigration and economic issues.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This is a complex topic without easy answers. I appreciate Vance highlighting the importance of American jobs, but hope he and others can engage in nuanced discussions to find balanced solutions.
Hiring qualified Americans is certainly a valid consideration, but the visa fee hike may disproportionately impact certain industries. A balanced approach weighing both domestic and global talent needs could benefit everyone.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. Reasonable people can disagree on the right policy approach. I hope both sides can find common ground and constructive solutions that work for American businesses and workers.
The visa fee hike could have unintended consequences, like making it harder for US companies to access the global talent pool. I’d be interested to see data on how this policy impacts different sectors of the economy.
Vance’s comment seems a bit dismissive. While hiring Americans is important, the H-1B program also serves a purpose. I’m curious to hear more about his specific proposals for improving the visa system.
While prioritizing American workers is understandable, the H-1B program also helps fill critical skill gaps. I’m curious to hear more about Vance’s perspective on striking the right balance between domestic and foreign talent.
While I understand the desire to prioritize American jobs, the H-1B program also plays an important role in addressing skills gaps. I hope policymakers can find ways to balance these competing interests.
I’m curious to hear more about Vance’s specific ideas for reforming the H-1B program to better serve American workers. Simply telling states to ‘hire Americans’ doesn’t seem like a comprehensive solution.