Listen to the article
President Trump announced Wednesday that he would exclude South Africa from the 2026 G-20 summit in Miami, Florida, citing what he described as “horrific human rights abuses” in the country.
“To put it more bluntly, they are killing white people and randomly allowing their farms to be taken from them,” Trump claimed in a post on Truth Social. His statement declared that South Africa would not receive an invitation to next year’s summit, which is scheduled to be held at Trump’s Doral resort in Miami.
The unprecedented move threatens to disrupt the long-standing tradition of inclusion that has defined the G-20 since its inception. If implemented, this would mark the first time in the group’s history that a founding member has been formally excluded from the gathering of the world’s major economies.
South African officials immediately pushed back against Trump’s announcement. Clayson Monyela, head of diplomacy for South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation, dismissed the notion that the country could be excluded from the forum.
“South Africa is a founding member of the G-20. We don’t get invited to G-20 meetings and leaders summit. Those are gatherings of members. If other members allow this then the G-20 will die,” Monyela told Fox News Digital. He added that other countries had already expressed solidarity with South Africa, suggesting they would boycott the U.S. summit if South Africa were excluded.
The G-20, which represents approximately 80% of global GDP and two-thirds of the world’s population, has traditionally operated as an inclusive forum for economic cooperation among major advanced and emerging economies.
This latest development follows the Trump administration’s earlier boycott of the 2025 G-20 meeting in Johannesburg this November. At that time, U.S. officials objected to what they characterized as the South African government’s failure to address violence in rural farming communities and criticized the meeting’s focus on climate and development issues rather than core economic priorities.
Beyond the G-20 exclusion, Trump also announced an immediate halt to U.S. financial support for South Africa. “South Africa has demonstrated to the world they are not a country worthy of membership anywhere and we are going to stop all payments and subsidies to them, effective immediately,” Trump wrote.
The diplomatic tension between the two nations has been escalating for months. In February, Trump suspended U.S. aid to South Africa over allegations of discrimination against White farmers. The conflict intensified in March when the State Department expelled the South African ambassador, declaring him “persona non grata.”
A particularly tense moment occurred in May during an Oval Office meeting when Trump pressed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa about allegations that White Afrikaners were being targeted and killed in South Africa. Ramaphosa reportedly challenged these claims, stating he had seen no evidence to support such allegations.
The South African Embassy has not yet responded to requests for comment on Trump’s latest statements, and neither the White House nor the State Department has provided additional details about how the move might affect South Africa’s standing within the G-20 or broader U.S.-South Africa relations.
The situation raises significant questions about the future cohesion of the G-20, which has served as a key forum for international economic coordination since the 2008 financial crisis. Trump’s decision to host the summit at his own Miami property had already drawn attention, and this latest controversy adds another layer of complexity to the preparations for the 2026 gathering.
Economic analysts suggest that excluding a founding member could undermine the G-20’s effectiveness as a global economic forum at a time when international cooperation on trade, financial stability, and development remains critical.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


26 Comments
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward Politics might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.