Listen to the article
President Trump announced late Friday that he is terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis living in Minnesota with immediate effect, citing allegations of money laundering and gang activity within the community.
“Minnesota, under Governor [Tim] Waltz, is a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity,” Trump declared in a post on his Truth Social platform. “I am, as President of the United States, hereby terminating, effective immediately, the Temporary Protected Status (TPS Program) for Somalis in Minnesota.”
The controversial declaration takes aim at one of the largest Somali diaspora communities in the United States. Minnesota has become home to tens of thousands of Somali immigrants and refugees over the past three decades, many of whom rely on TPS protections to legally live and work in the country.
In his statement, Trump further alleged that “Somali gangs are terrorizing the people of that great State, and BILLIONS of Dollars are missing,” concluding with the directive to “Send them back to where they came from. It’s OVER!”
The Temporary Protected Status program was established as part of the Immigration Act of 1990 to provide temporary legal status to nationals from countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary conditions that make return unsafe. Somalia has been designated for TPS since 1991 due to ongoing armed conflict and extraordinary conditions, including drought, floods, and food insecurity that have created a humanitarian crisis.
Immigration experts note that presidential authority over TPS designations is significant but typically follows formal review processes through the Department of Homeland Security. The abrupt nature of Trump’s announcement raises questions about implementation protocols and legal challenges that may follow.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s office has not yet responded to requests for comment. The governor, who has previously defended the contributions of the state’s immigrant communities, will likely face pressure to address the president’s characterization of the state as a hub for criminal activity.
The Somali community in Minnesota has established deep roots over decades, with members serving in local government, running businesses, and contributing to the state’s economy and cultural fabric. Minneapolis in particular has been called “Little Mogadishu” due to its large Somali population, estimated at around 70,000 people statewide.
Community advocates have long pushed back against generalizations about criminal activity, arguing that such characterizations unfairly stigmatize an entire community based on actions of a small minority. Studies have shown that immigrant communities typically have lower crime rates than the general population.
The economic implications of this decision could be substantial. TPS holders are legally authorized to work and have established businesses, purchased homes, and integrated into communities. A sudden revocation threatens to disrupt not only individual lives but also local economies that have come to depend on Somali-American contributions.
Human rights organizations have consistently warned against forcing returns to Somalia, which continues to face security challenges from the Al-Shabaab terrorist group, political instability, and environmental crises. The United Nations and other international bodies have documented ongoing human rights violations and humanitarian concerns in the East African nation.
The White House has not yet offered an official response to the president’s announcement, leaving questions about implementation timelines and whether federal agencies have been directed to begin enforcement actions.
Legal challenges to the order are almost certain, as previous attempts to terminate TPS designations for other countries have faced prolonged court battles during the Trump administration’s first term.
As this situation develops, Minnesota’s Somali community faces uncertainty about their legal status and future in a state many have called home for decades.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


13 Comments
While national security is important, sweeping allegations of criminal activity within the Somali community require solid evidence. Ending TPS without due process raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of this decision.
Agreed. Proper investigation and legal procedures should be followed before taking such a drastic step that could disrupt the lives of many innocent people.
As someone who follows commodity and energy markets, I’m concerned about how this could impact Minnesota’s Somali immigrant communities that are integral to the state’s economy. Disrupting their legal status could have broader implications.
This is a concerning development. Revoking TPS protections could have serious humanitarian consequences for Somali immigrants and refugees in Minnesota. I hope the administration reconsiders this decision and works to address any legitimate concerns through proper legal channels.
I agree, this seems like a hasty and politically-motivated move that could create instability and hardship for vulnerable communities.
Curious to know more about the specific allegations of money laundering and gang activity that are being used to justify this policy change. Terminating TPS seems like an extreme measure without clear justification.
I share your curiosity. The administration should provide transparent evidence to support these claims before taking such a consequential action.
As someone who follows commodity and energy markets, I’m concerned about how this could impact Minnesota’s Somali immigrant communities that are integral to the state’s economy. Disrupting their legal status could have ripple effects.
Good point. Revoking TPS for Somalis could disrupt important economic and social ties in Minnesota, which is an important hub for mining, energy, and other industries.
The administration should provide transparent evidence to support these claims before taking such a consequential action that could have ripple effects on Minnesota’s economy and communities.
Proper investigation and legal procedures should be followed before taking such a drastic step that could disrupt the lives of many innocent people. Sweeping allegations require solid evidence.
This seems like a hasty and politically-motivated move that could create instability and hardship for vulnerable communities. I hope the administration reconsiders and addresses any legitimate concerns through proper legal channels.
Revoking TPS for Somalis could disrupt important economic and social ties in Minnesota, which is an important hub for mining, energy, and other industries. This seems like an extreme measure without clear justification.