Listen to the article
Texas Governor Designates CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood as Terrorist Organizations, Bans Property Acquisition
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has officially designated the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations, effectively prohibiting both groups from purchasing land in Texas.
In a statement released Tuesday, Abbott justified the move by claiming, “The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world.'”
“The actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment are unacceptable,” Abbott continued. “These radical extremists are not welcome in our state and are now prohibited from acquiring any real property interest in Texas.”
The proclamation signed by Abbott alleges that CAIR “is an Islamist organization that, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations, was founded as a ‘front group’ for ‘Hamas and its support network’ in the United States.” The document further claims that “CAIR and its members have repeatedly employed, affiliated with, and supported individuals promoting terrorism-related activities.”
As evidence, the proclamation cites Ghassan Elashi, a founding member of CAIR’s Texas branch and former Treasurer of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, who was sentenced to 65 years in prison in 2009 for financing terrorism.
The document also connects Hamas to the Muslim Brotherhood, stating that Hamas was “formed in 1987 as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.” It notes that several countries, including Austria, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, have limited or prohibited Muslim Brotherhood activities, citing terrorism concerns or attempts to destabilize these nations.
CAIR swiftly responded to the governor’s actions, describing itself as “an independent American civil rights organization that has spent 30 years protecting free speech, advancing religious freedom, and promoting justice for people here and abroad.”
“We have consistently condemned all forms of unjust violence, including hate crimes, ethnic cleansing, genocide and terrorism. In fact, we condemn terrorism so often that ISIS once put a target on our national executive director,” the organization stated.
CAIR dismissed Abbott’s proclamation as a “publicity stunt” with “no basis in fact or law,” accusing the governor of “defaming a prominent American Muslim institution with debunked conspiracy theories and made-up quotes.” The organization characterized Abbott as “an Israel First politician who has spent months stoking anti-Muslim hysteria to smear American Muslims critical of the Israeli government.”
The civil rights organization also noted it has successfully sued Abbott “three different times for shredding the First Amendment for the benefit of the Israeli government,” and expressed readiness to take legal action again if “he attempts to turn this publicity stunt into actual policy.”
This designation marks a significant escalation in Abbott’s stance toward these organizations and comes amid heightened tensions following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The move aligns with broader conservative criticism of CAIR, which has faced scrutiny from Republican lawmakers who have called for federal investigations into alleged Hamas ties.
Legal experts question whether a state governor has the authority to designate foreign terrorist organizations, a power typically reserved for federal agencies. The proclamation is likely to face legal challenges on constitutional grounds, particularly regarding religious freedom and property rights.
The Muslim Brotherhood, a transnational Islamist organization founded in Egypt in 1928, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Abbott’s actions.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
While concerns about extremism are valid, this action raises red flags around potential discrimination and infringement on religious freedoms. I hope the courts will closely scrutinize the justifications and legal basis for these designations.
This seems like a politically-motivated move that could do more harm than good. I would urge the governor to reconsider this approach and seek input from a wider range of stakeholders and legal experts.
Restricting land purchases based on these designations is a concerning development that could have significant economic and social impacts on Muslim communities in Texas. I hope there is robust oversight and accountability around this policy.
This is a complex and sensitive issue. While combating extremism is important, designating entire organizations as ‘terrorist’ without due process raises serious civil liberties concerns that merit close scrutiny.
This decision could have significant implications for Muslim communities in Texas. I hope there is thorough due process and transparency around the evidence used to justify these designations.
Designating entire organizations as ‘terrorist’ is a very serious step. I would encourage the governor to work closely with legal experts, civil rights advocates, and Muslim community leaders to ensure this is done in a fair and constitutional manner.
As a Texan, I have mixed feelings about this decision. On one hand, the threat of extremism is real and should be addressed. But on the other, these broad designations seem like an overreach that could backfire and alienate Muslim Texans.
This is a controversial and divisive move by the Texas governor. While the threat of extremism should be taken seriously, designating entire organizations as ‘terrorist’ raises concerns about civil liberties and religious freedom.
I can understand the desire to combat potential extremist influences, but this approach seems overly broad and heavy-handed. Careful analysis and targeting of specific individuals or activities would be a more prudent course of action.