Listen to the article
Republicans Push for Secret Service Funding After Third Trump Assassination Attempt
Republicans are demanding immediate action to fund the Secret Service following what appears to be a third assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump’s life during the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on Saturday.
The federal law enforcement agency has operated without proper funding for 74 days amid an unprecedented Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown. While the funding impasse initially stemmed from Democratic opposition to immigration enforcement operations, the responsibility now falls on House Republicans to break the deadlock.
A bill that would fund most DHS agencies, including the Secret Service, passed the Senate in March but has since stalled in the House. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) had previously hesitated to bring the legislation to the floor because it specifically excludes funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
However, Saturday’s security incident appears to have shifted Johnson’s position. “We have to move DHS funding because it’s urgent,” Johnson told reporters Monday. “As the secretary of Homeland has said, we’re out of money. He’s out of money at the end of this week. It’s very dangerous, as demonstrated Saturday night. We’ve got to get the job done.”
The shooting outside the White House Correspondents’ Dinner venue has heightened the urgency around the funding issue. Secret Service agents successfully neutralized a suspect identified as Cole Allen, who reportedly had anti-Trump posts on social media.
Some House Republicans are now urging Johnson to advance the Senate’s partial DHS funding bill. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-N.Y.) sent a letter to Johnson requesting immediate consideration of the legislation.
“There is no time for delay,” Langworthy wrote. “As put on full display for the American people with the attack surrounding the White House Correspondents’ Dinner this weekend, our country remains at risk.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) blamed House Republicans for the ongoing funding gap, urging them to “bring the bipartisan Senate-passed bill to the House floor today,” which he noted “would fund the Department of Homeland Security in its entirety, with the exception of ICE and the violent Republican mass deportation machine.”
Congressional Republicans have been pursuing a two-track approach to address the DHS funding crisis. One component would fund the Secret Service and other homeland security functions through the Senate-passed bill. The second part would use the budget reconciliation process to fund ICE and CBP for three-and-a-half years.
House Republicans are expected to approve a Senate-passed budget resolution as early as Wednesday, which would unlock the reconciliation process. Trump himself urged House Republicans to approve the Senate measure without modifications on Monday afternoon.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are exploring additional options to fund the Secret Service and remaining DHS components. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) suggested forcing Democrats to take another vote on funding the entire department.
“This week, the Senate should put Democrats on record again and see how they vote,” Scott posted on X. “Will they decide now is a good time to finally fund Secret Service and all of DHS? Even after last night’s violence and ANOTHER assassination attempt against the President of the United States, this shouldn’t be such a fight to get done.”
Some Republicans are considering more drastic measures. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) suggested that “this may be the moment” to eliminate the Senate filibuster if Democrats continue to block full DHS funding. “The Democrats will do it when they get the majority,” Johnson said on “Mornings with Maria.” “At a moment of natural danger, if Democrats refuse to fund DHS, I will say this would be the time to nuke the filibuster for good.”
Trump has consistently advocated for eliminating the Senate’s 60-vote threshold requirement, though many Republican senators remain reluctant to take such action, fearing it could advantage Democrats when they next control the chamber.
White House budget chief Russ Vought was scheduled to meet with House Republicans later Monday to discuss potential paths forward on DHS funding.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
This is a complex issue without easy answers. While the Secret Service’s role in protecting our leaders is crucial, the broader DHS funding dispute shouldn’t be overlooked. I hope our representatives can work together to find a balanced approach that addresses security needs while upholding democratic principles.
Well said. Balancing security and civil liberties is an ongoing challenge, but it’s essential for a healthy democracy.
The Secret Service funding debate highlights the delicate balance between security and democratic values. I hope our representatives can find a solution that safeguards our leaders while also addressing the broader DHS funding impasse in a bipartisan manner.
This assassination attempt highlights the importance of ensuring the Secret Service has adequate resources to fulfill its vital mission. However, the larger DHS funding dispute shouldn’t be forgotten, as it impacts many critical government functions beyond just the Secret Service.
Agreed. The Secret Service’s role is crucial, but the broader DHS funding issues deserve equal attention and a nuanced, bipartisan solution.
Securing our leaders is paramount, but the Secret Service funding debate is just one facet of the larger DHS funding impasse. I hope Congress can move past partisan gridlock and find a way to responsibly fund all DHS agencies, including the Secret Service.
The Secret Service funding debate is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. While protecting our leaders is critical, the broader DHS funding impasse shouldn’t be ignored. I hope Congress can find a bipartisan solution that addresses security needs while upholding democratic principles.
You make a fair point. Striking the right balance between security and civil liberties is always challenging, but it’s essential for a healthy democracy.