Listen to the article
Pennsylvania authorities are defending their actions after federal agents arrested an Uzbek immigrant with suspected terror ties who had obtained a Pennsylvania commercial driver’s license. The case has sparked controversy about state vetting procedures and raised questions about federal immigration enforcement.
Akhror Bozorov was apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) while driving a tractor-trailer in Kansas. He was reportedly wanted in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, for alleged terrorist group connections, according to the Department of Homeland Security. At the time of his arrest, Bozorov possessed a valid Pennsylvania commercial driver’s license (CDL) with a listed address in the Somerton neighborhood of Philadelphia.
Governor Josh Shapiro pushed back against criticism, noting that Bozorov’s information was checked through federal databases when he applied for his license in July, and those systems did not flag any security concerns.
“We checked the federal database months ago, when this individual received his CDL, and he was authorized to get it by the federal database,” Shapiro said Wednesday. “Ironically, we went and checked the database yesterday—he’s still qualified to get a CDL.”
The governor placed blame on federal systems, stating that DHS was “clearly not minding the shop” and needed to improve its vetting processes since “every single state in the country relies on this database when making a determination as to who qualifies for a CDL.”
In a letter to Pennsylvania legislative leaders obtained by Fox News Digital, state officials further defended their procedures. PennDOT Secretary Mike Carroll, a Democrat, and Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt, a Republican, wrote that they were responding to “misstatements and ill-informed speculation” about the state’s driver licensing practices.
“All non-citizens who apply for driver’s licenses must provide PennDOT with proof of identity and must have their legal presence in this country verified through the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database,” Carroll and Schmidt explained in their letter.
The officials emphasized that the SAVE database is maintained by DHS, and that PennDOT had followed “the established federal process for confirming that the applicant was lawfully present.” They added that as recently as Tuesday, the database still showed no issues with Bozorov’s status.
The letter also addressed concerns about voter registration, noting that non-citizens who legally obtain licenses receive “special indicators” that prevent them from using “motor voter” registration processes.
DHS contested Shapiro’s characterization of the situation, however. A department spokesperson stated Thursday that federal work authorization “does not confer any legal status in this country” and blamed data limitations on previous administrations.
“Just because the Biden administration granted Bozorov—a wanted terrorist—work authorization and sanctuary politician Gov. Shapiro allowed him to get a CDL in Pennsylvania, does not mean he should be on America’s roads operating an 18-wheeler and potentially transporting hazardous materials,” the DHS spokesperson said.
The case highlights growing tensions between federal and state authorities over immigration enforcement and national security protocols. Commercial driver’s licenses have become a particular concern due to the potential security implications of allowing individuals with questionable backgrounds to operate large vehicles that could potentially transport hazardous materials.
This incident occurs amid broader national debate about immigration enforcement and vetting procedures, with states increasingly finding themselves caught between federal policies and local security concerns. For Pennsylvania, a key swing state with significant transportation infrastructure, the controversy adds another dimension to ongoing political discussions about immigration and security ahead of upcoming elections.
State officials maintain they followed all required procedures and relied on federal systems that failed to identify Bozorov as a security risk, while federal authorities suggest that states should exercise additional caution beyond the baseline federal requirements when issuing commercial driving credentials.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
13 Comments
This is a troubling development. While the governor claims the federal database checks were done properly, the fact that a suspected terrorist was able to obtain a commercial license is deeply concerning. The vetting process clearly needs to be strengthened to prevent such security risks.
Absolutely. The public deserves to know what specific vulnerabilities allowed this to happen and what concrete steps will be taken to close these gaps and improve the system.
This case highlights the importance of continuously evaluating the effectiveness of the commercial driver’s license vetting process. While the governor insists the proper procedures were followed, the fact that a suspected terrorist was able to obtain a license is deeply troubling and warrants a full investigation.
Concerning to hear about this security breach. The governor’s claim that the proper checks were done seems at odds with the fact that a suspected terrorist was able to get a commercial license. More transparency is needed to understand how this happened and what steps will be taken to prevent similar cases in the future.
This is certainly a concerning case. It’s good the governor is addressing it directly and emphasizing that the background check procedures were followed. However, it raises questions about the accuracy and effectiveness of the federal databases used to vet commercial driver’s license applicants.
I agree, the vetting process needs to be thoroughly reviewed. If someone with suspected terror ties can still obtain a commercial license, that’s a serious security gap that must be addressed.
This is a concerning case that raises serious questions about the integrity of the commercial driver’s license vetting system. The governor’s claim that the proper procedures were followed does not fully address the fact that a suspected terrorist was still able to obtain a license. A thorough review of the process is clearly needed.
The governor’s response raises more questions than answers. If the federal database checks were properly conducted, how did this suspected terrorist still manage to obtain a commercial license? This case underscores the need for a comprehensive review of the vetting process for commercial drivers.
It’s troubling to hear about this suspected terrorist driver operating in the US. While the governor claims the proper checks were done, the fact that he was still able to obtain a license is very worrying. Stricter scrutiny of these federal databases seems warranted.
Absolutely. The public deserves to know how this individual slipped through the cracks and what steps are being taken to prevent similar situations in the future.
The governor’s response seems to shift blame to the federal databases, but the public deserves a more comprehensive explanation of how this security breach occurred. Maintaining public trust requires addressing the vulnerabilities that allowed a suspected terrorist to obtain a commercial license, despite the supposed background checks.
The governor’s response seems reasonable, but this case highlights the need for continuous monitoring and improvement of the commercial driver’s license vetting process. Ensuring public safety should be the top priority.
I agree, the governor is right to emphasize that the proper procedures were followed. However, the fact that a suspected terrorist was still able to obtain a license is very concerning and warrants a thorough investigation.