Listen to the article
Former Atlanta Mayor’s Ethics Questions Surface in Georgia Gubernatorial Race
Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, currently a frontrunner in Georgia’s Democratic gubernatorial primary, faces renewed scrutiny over ethics concerns that shadowed her tenure in city government as she seeks the state’s highest office.
Bottoms, who leads in most major polls ahead of the May 19 Democratic primary, has built significant momentum in her campaign. However, questions about her past use of public resources and alleged pay-to-play contracting have reemerged as election day approaches.
The most concerning allegations involve Bottoms’ dealings with Con-Real, a contracting firm that secured lucrative city contracts after Bottoms signed an initial consulting agreement with the company. The first contract, worth under $100,000, was signed in April 2017 while Bottoms served as executive director of the Atlanta Fulton County Recreation Authority (AFCRA), a position she held concurrently with her city council seat during her mayoral campaign.
Within months, Con-Real won a second contract worth $2.4 million despite bidding approximately twice what competitors offered, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The company later secured a third contract for $1.4 million in 2018 while Bottoms was mayor, again as the highest bidder.
“I mean, I think it’s concerning,” former Atlanta City Council ethics committee head Jennifer Ide told Fox News Digital. “I don’t think that the voters want to feel like special interests impact the outcome of an election.”
Critics have pointed out that neither contract appears to have received formal approval from the recreation authority’s board, raising governance questions. Following the controversy, AFCRA amended its contracting procedures, according to Kyle Gomez-Leineweber, policy director at watchdog group Common Cause Georgia.
“There were serious concerns that were raised around ethics,” Gomez-Leineweber noted.
Campaign finance records show Gerald Alley, Con-Real’s founder and CEO, held a fundraiser for Bottoms’ mayoral campaign in August 2017 and donated nearly $4,000 to her campaign shortly after winning the arena contract. More recently, in June 2025, Alley contributed the maximum allowable primary donation of $8,400 to Bottoms’ gubernatorial campaign.
The Con-Real matter is not isolated. Bottoms previously incurred a $37,000 state ethics fine over campaign finance violations and faced questions about taxpayer-funded mailers featuring her image. She also drew criticism for using public funds for certain expenses, including initially covering her husband’s airfare to the Super Bowl and thousands in limousine expenditures.
“It sure looked fishy that Con-Real was not the lowest bidder,” Ide observed. “I don’t know exactly what the procurement rules are for the recreation authority, but for the city, the lowest responsive bidder is who would have needed to have been selected.”
Atlanta has a troubled history with corruption scandals, making ethics concerns particularly resonant with voters. Both Ide and Humberto Garcia, a Democrat who founded Neighbors for a United Atlanta, described Bottoms as “absent-minded” during her mayoral tenure and questioned her commitment to serving Georgia’s best interests.
“I really believe that as people start to dig under the surface, they’re going to see that she’s not fit for office,” Garcia said.
The gubernatorial race has significant implications for Georgia, a critical swing state that has seen intense political competition in recent elections. Despite the ethical questions, Bottoms maintains her lead over former Georgia General Assembly member and DeKalb County Chief Executive Michael Thurmond, who currently polls second in the Democratic primary race.
“If you’re going to run for the highest office in the state, there needs to be no questions about whether you’re being influenced by your campaign donations in that kind of way,” Ide emphasized.
Neither the Bottoms campaign nor Con-Real responded to requests for comment.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
This raises some concerning questions about the former mayor’s ethics record. As a frontrunner, it’s important she addresses these issues head-on and provides full transparency.
I agree, transparency and accountability are critical for candidates seeking high office. The public deserves to know the facts behind these allegations.
While the details are still emerging, these allegations highlight the importance of robust ethics oversight and enforcement, even for seasoned politicians. Voters should demand accountability.
If true, these pay-to-play concerns could significantly undermine public trust in the political process. Rigorous investigation and transparent resolution are essential.
Agreed. Voters need to know they can trust their elected officials to put the public interest first, not their own personal or financial gain.
It’s troubling to see these types of pay-to-play accusations resurface, especially in a high-profile gubernatorial race. Voters will want assurances that their elected officials are acting with integrity.
This story underscores the need for strong ethics laws and enforcement to prevent conflicts of interest and corruption, even at the highest levels of government.
Interesting allegations around potential pay-to-play contracting in the Georgia governor’s race. Voters will want to see a thorough investigation to ensure integrity in the political process.
Hmm, the timing of these allegations, just ahead of the primary, seems a bit suspicious. Still, the public deserves answers, and the candidate should address them directly and without delay.