Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

FDA Intensifies Calls for Amgen to Remove Tavneos, Citing Data Manipulation

The FDA has escalated its campaign against Amgen’s autoimmune therapy Tavneos, raising serious allegations about the integrity of clinical data that led to the drug’s approval nearly five years ago. The agency now claims the drug’s pivotal study results were manipulated to make the treatment appear effective.

“New information that only became known to CDER [Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research] more than three years after approval shows that unblinded study personnel manipulated the results of the pivotal clinical study so the drug looked effective when the original analysis did not support that conclusion,” the FDA said in a statement released Monday.

While making these significant allegations, the FDA did not provide specific evidence supporting its claims. The agency further accused Amgen of regulatory violations by failing to disclose the original analysis in its application, stating that CDER “can no longer conclude that there is, or has ever been, a valid demonstration that Tavneos is effective.”

Amgen has defended its position, with a company spokesperson telling BioSpace: “Patient safety guides every decision we make. We remain confident in TAVNEOS as a safe and effective medicine, supported by years of clinical data and real-world evidence. Our perspective on the benefit-risk profile of TAVNEOS differs from the Agency’s. We will evaluate next steps and respond to the FDA, while keeping patient needs and support at the forefront.”

The oral complement blocker received FDA approval in October 2021 for treating severe active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis (ANCA vasculitis), a group of rare autoimmune inflammatory diseases that damage blood vessels. Tavneos was originally developed by ChemoCentryx before Amgen acquired the company in 2022 for $3.7 billion.

This latest announcement marks a significant escalation in tensions between the FDA and Amgen over Tavneos. The FDA first called for the drug’s withdrawal in January after discovering problems with how ChemoCentryx re-adjudicated the primary endpoint in the pivotal study supporting the drug’s application. Amgen refused this initial request.

The situation worsened in March when the FDA issued a safety alert highlighting 76 cases of liver injury and eight deaths in patients taking Tavneos. These safety signals, detected through post-marketing surveillance, showed “reasonable evidence of a causal association” with the drug, according to the agency.

While Amgen has acknowledged liver toxicity as a known risk associated with Tavneos—information that appears in the product’s label—the FDA contends that the cases outlined in its safety alert, particularly those with fatal outcomes, “represent new safety concerns.”

In its most recent statement, the FDA reiterated its mounting concerns about Tavneos’s safety profile. Despite the strengthened rhetoric and serious allegations, the agency has not yet taken formal action to force Amgen to remove the product from the market. For now, Tavneos remains available to patients and prescribers.

The dispute highlights growing tensions between pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities over drug safety and efficacy standards. For the rare disease community affected by ANCA vasculitis, the situation creates uncertainty about treatment options. ANCA vasculitis affects approximately 10 to 20 people per million annually in the United States, and treatments for this condition are limited.

Industry analysts note that this case could have broader implications for how clinical trial data is reviewed and validated during the approval process. The FDA’s unusual public criticism of data integrity raises questions about potential reforms to prevent similar situations in the future.

The ongoing dispute also underscores the challenges pharmaceutical companies face when acquiring smaller biotech firms and inheriting their product portfolios. Amgen’s $3.7 billion acquisition of ChemoCentryx in 2022 was largely driven by Tavneos’s market potential, which now faces significant regulatory headwinds.

As this situation develops, patient advocacy groups are closely monitoring the impact on treatment access while awaiting further evidence and potential resolution between Amgen and the FDA.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

22 Comments

  1. Patricia Lopez on

    Drug approvals should be based on sound scientific evidence, not manipulated data. The FDA is right to scrutinize this issue closely. Transparency from Amgen will be key to resolving this.

    • Yes, the public deserves to have confidence that approved drugs are truly effective and safe. Any hint of data manipulation is very concerning.

  2. Jennifer Garcia on

    This news is deeply concerning. The FDA’s allegations, if proven true, raise serious questions about the approval process for Tavneos and the integrity of Amgen’s clinical data. Transparency and accountability are essential to maintain public trust in the pharmaceutical industry.

    • Elijah Jones on

      Absolutely. The FDA must thoroughly investigate this matter and take appropriate action to ensure that the drug approval system is based on sound, unbiased scientific evidence.

  3. Jennifer Lopez on

    The FDA’s claims are serious and warrant a thorough investigation. If true, Amgen’s alleged data manipulation is a major breach of trust that could have significant public health implications. The company must provide a robust and transparent response.

    • William Williams on

      I agree. The integrity of clinical data is critical for the public’s confidence in approved drugs. Any hint of tampering is unacceptable and must be addressed swiftly.

  4. This is a troubling development. If the allegations are true, it’s a major breach of trust. The FDA must get to the bottom of this and take appropriate action to protect public health.

    • Robert C. Davis on

      Absolutely. Pharmaceutical companies must be held accountable for the integrity of their clinical data. Ongoing oversight is crucial.

  5. Elizabeth Johnson on

    Data manipulation in drug approvals is a grave concern. The FDA’s allegations against Amgen, if substantiated, undermine the entire system. Transparency and accountability are essential to maintain public trust.

    • Jennifer Thompson on

      Absolutely. The FDA must get to the bottom of this issue and take appropriate action to protect public health and ensure the integrity of the drug approval process.

  6. William Moore on

    This is a troubling development that raises serious questions about the approval process for Tavneos. The FDA’s allegations, if true, are a major breach of public trust. Amgen needs to provide a clear and convincing response.

    • Liam Jackson on

      I agree. The public deserves to have confidence that approved drugs are safe and effective. Any lapses in this regard are unacceptable.

  7. William Smith on

    This news raises a lot of questions. If the FDA’s allegations are correct, it’s a major breach of trust that could have significant public health implications. Amgen needs to provide a robust response.

    • Indeed. The FDA must thoroughly investigate this matter and take appropriate action to maintain confidence in the drug approval process.

  8. Mary Martinez on

    The FDA’s claims against Amgen are very serious and demand a thorough investigation. If the allegations of data manipulation are true, it’s a major breach of trust that undermines the entire drug approval process. Amgen must provide a clear and convincing response to address the agency’s concerns.

    • I agree. The public deserves to have confidence that approved drugs are safe and effective. Any lapses in the integrity of clinical data are unacceptable and must be addressed swiftly.

  9. Oliver Jones on

    The FDA’s claims are deeply concerning. Manipulated data in drug approvals is unacceptable and undermines patient trust. Amgen must address this issue head-on and demonstrate full transparency.

    • Patricia Z. Rodriguez on

      Absolutely. The integrity of clinical trials is paramount. Any hint of data tampering is a serious breach that the FDA must investigate thoroughly.

  10. Data manipulation in drug approvals is a serious issue that undermines the entire system. The FDA is right to demand answers from Amgen. Transparency and accountability are paramount.

    • Elijah Rodriguez on

      I agree. The public relies on the FDA to ensure the safety and efficacy of approved drugs. Any lapses in this regard are unacceptable.

  11. Elizabeth Jackson on

    This is a serious allegation from the FDA. If true, it’s troubling that manipulated data could lead to a drug approval. I hope Amgen is able to provide a transparent explanation to address the FDA’s concerns.

    • Linda Martinez on

      Agreed, the integrity of clinical data is critical for public trust. The FDA needs to thoroughly investigate this matter.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.