Listen to the article
President Trump has embarked on an ambitious series of renovation projects across Washington, drawing on his background as a real estate developer to reshape the nation’s capital according to his vision. The initiatives include a massive 250-foot triumphal arch, modifications to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, and repairs to decorative fountains throughout the city. However, fact-checking reveals significant discrepancies between the administration’s claims and historical reality.
The centerpiece of Trump’s vision is a gold-embellished triumphal arch standing 250 feet tall, proposed for construction at one end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge. This bridge connects the Lincoln Memorial in Washington to the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington, Virginia. Trump has claimed that earlier efforts to build such an arch were interrupted by the Civil War, but this assertion is historically inaccurate and anachronistic.
The Arlington Memorial Bridge was actually designed and constructed to commemorate the reunification of the North and South after the Civil War. While a White House spokesman defended the project as keeping with classical tradition and other prominent Washington landmarks, no evidence has been provided for historical attempts to erect such an arch at this location.
The confusion may stem from an 1851 Fourth of July speech by Secretary of State Daniel Webster, who claimed President Andrew Jackson “desired to span” the Potomac River “with arches of ever-enduring granite, symbolical of the firmly established union of the North and the South.” However, according to Bob Dover, a geologist who recently wrote a book on Washington bridge history, Webster’s description of granite arches referred to the supporting structures of the bridge itself, not a freestanding triumphal arch.
Furthermore, the bridge Webster and Jackson discussed was likely the Long Bridge, a different structure connecting Washington to Virginia south of the Memorial Bridge, near the Jefferson Memorial. The Treasury Department under Jackson invited proposals for this bridge in 1832 after flood damage, and Jackson attended its reopening in 1835. Historical records show Jackson favored “eternal arches of massive stone” for the bridge’s support structure, not a decorative triumphal arch.
The Congressional Research Service, responding to a request from Representative Steve Cohen, a Tennessee Democrat, confirmed it could find no statements from any president or staff advocating for a triumphal arch in Washington before Trump’s second term. While efforts to build a commemorative bridge began in earnest in 1886, and one winning design did include two Roman triumphal arches, that design was ultimately abandoned.
The 1902 McMillan Plan, which called for reconstruction of the National Mall and a bridge from the Lincoln Memorial to Arlington National Cemetery, specifically emphasized that the bridge’s “low-level design was essential” to avoid overshadowing the Lincoln Memorial and other monuments. No subsequent designs included a triumphal arch.
Trump has also made misleading claims about the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which recently underwent repairs. He stated the pool was “longer than any skyscraper in the world” and that previous administrations had “squandered hundreds of millions of dollars” on repairs. Both claims are false.
The Reflecting Pool measures approximately 2,028 feet long and 167 feet wide. If its length represented a skyscraper’s height, three buildings would still be taller: the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur, and the Shanghai Tower in Shanghai.
Regarding costs, structural problems with the pool did emerge shortly after its 1920s completion. Various repairs occurred throughout the decades, including a reinforced concrete bottom in 1929 and drainage trenches in the 1930s. Major restoration finally occurred in 2009 when the National Park Service used stimulus funding for comprehensive work. The pool reopened in 2012, with $35.3 million awarded to a Maryland construction company for removing algae, replacing the pool bottom, installing new circulation and filtration systems, and adding accessibility features.
The Biden administration did not undertake major repairs but awarded two contracts totaling approximately $230,000 to a Colorado landscape architect for rehabilitation proposals. Charles F. Sams III, National Park Service director from 2021 to 2025, estimated full rehabilitation would cost over $100 million, but no plans moved forward. In total, the Obama and Biden administrations spent about $35.5 million on the reflecting pool, far less than Trump’s “hundreds of millions” claim. Trump’s current renovation, which added a blue-tinted coating and resealing, has cost over $14 million but may not address underlying structural issues.
Trump’s claims about Washington’s fountains are also exaggerated. While many federally managed fountains have been inoperable for years, the actual number is lower than stated. The National Park Service manages at least 30 decorative fountains and announced plans in January to rehabilitate 18 sites, including nine with inoperable fountains, spending at least $60 million from park entrance fees. Evidence suggests that 14 fountains the White House cited as nonfunctional were actually operational, according to Park Service records, local news sources, and tourist photographs.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


10 Comments
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.