Listen to the article
The Supreme Court has not halted the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte, despite widespread claims circulating on social media suggesting otherwise.
A viral Facebook post, which has garnered over 1,300 reactions and hundreds of shares, falsely claimed that the Supreme Court issued an order blocking the renewed impeachment efforts against the Vice President. The misleading post featured a composite image of Duterte, several House justice committee members, and Supreme Court justices, with text suggesting the Court had intervened to stop the impeachment process.
Many social media users expressed gratitude toward the Supreme Court for this supposed intervention, indicating the misinformation had successfully confused the public about the actual status of the impeachment proceedings.
In reality, while Vice President Duterte did file a petition with the Supreme Court requesting intervention to block the impeachment proceedings, the High Court did not issue a temporary restraining order. This allowed the House justice panel to continue its public hearings on her impeachment case unimpeded.
Contrary to the false claims, the impeachment process has actually advanced. Six days after the misleading post began circulating, the House justice panel approved its report containing the resolution outlining the articles of impeachment against Duterte.
The confusion may stem partly from the Supreme Court’s January 2026 ruling that declared a previous impeachment case against Duterte unconstitutional for violating the one-year bar rule. However, this earlier decision does not affect the current impeachment proceedings against the Vice President.
After completing a series of hearings, the House justice committee has now elevated the impeachment complaint to the plenary level, with a vote expected on May 11. Political analysts anticipate that more than the required number of lawmakers will vote in favor of impeachment.
If one-third of House members support the motion, Duterte would be impeached for the second time. Following such a vote, the articles of impeachment would be transmitted to the Senate, which would then convene as an impeachment court to conduct a trial.
The Vice President faces serious accusations, including misuse of public funds, accumulation of ill-gotten wealth, and allegedly making death threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
This is not an isolated incident of misinformation regarding the Vice President’s impeachment proceedings. Fact-checking organization Rappler has previously debunked similar false claims about Duterte’s impeachment case, including a recent post falsely stating that the Supreme Court had dismissed the case entirely.
As the impeachment process continues to unfold, political observers note the importance of public access to accurate information about these significant constitutional proceedings, particularly given the high-profile nature of the case and the potential consequences for the country’s political landscape.
The spread of such misinformation highlights the ongoing challenge of combating political disinformation in the Philippines, especially around contentious political processes and high-profile political figures.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
While the impeachment case against Vice President Duterte is certainly controversial, I’m glad to see the Supreme Court taking a hands-off approach and allowing the process to unfold as intended. Judicial independence is crucial for a healthy democracy.
It’s good to see the Supreme Court taking a measured approach and not interfering with the impeachment process. Maintaining the integrity of democratic institutions is crucial, even when politically charged issues are involved.
I agree, the courts should avoid overstepping their bounds in politically sensitive matters like this. The impeachment proceedings should be allowed to proceed through the proper channels.
This highlights the importance of verifying claims on social media, especially related to high-profile political events. Spreading misinformation, even inadvertently, can undermine public trust in the system.
Absolutely. It’s crucial that people seek out authoritative and reliable sources when it comes to matters of government and the judicial process.
The fact that the Supreme Court did not issue a restraining order is a positive sign that the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Duterte will be allowed to move forward without undue interference. Transparency and due process are crucial in these types of cases.
Yes, it’s important that the impeachment process is allowed to play out in accordance with the established procedures and precedents, without the courts unduly influencing the outcome.
It’s heartening to see the Supreme Court upholding the integrity of the impeachment process, even in the face of politically charged rhetoric and misinformation. Maintaining the rule of law is essential for a well-functioning democracy.
I’m curious to see how the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Duterte will unfold. It’s important that the process is transparent and fair, regardless of the political stakes involved.
Agreed. The public deserves to have confidence that the impeachment process is being carried out in a impartial manner, without undue interference from the courts or other branches of government.