Listen to the article
Nigeria’s Power Ministry Refutes Reports of Minister’s Three-Month Grid Collapse Promise
Nigeria’s Ministry of Power has issued a formal statement dismissing media reports claiming that Power Minister Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe promised to resolve the country’s persistent national grid collapse issues within three months.
The clarification, released Thursday by ministry spokesperson Adeola Adelabu, characterized these reports as “a clear misrepresentation” of Tegbe’s statements during his Senate confirmation hearing on May 6. According to Adelabu, the minister “made no such commitment” and instead indicated that efforts to stabilize the grid would begin within his first 100 days in office.
However, a comparison between the spokesperson’s statement and Tegbe’s actual testimony reveals nuances that have been overlooked in the ministry’s clarification.
During his Senate screening, while Tegbe did not explicitly state he would “fix grid collapse in three months,” he made several remarks that established clear expectations within that timeframe. Most notably, he told senators: “My promise to Nigerians and to this chamber is that Nigerians will see visible improvement in the sector. If you don’t see this in three months, it means you won’t see it in six months. So you must see it in three months, and you must hold us accountable for it.”
When specifically addressing grid stability issues, Tegbe stated: “There are questions around grid collapse, and the next phase, in 100 days, is to stabilise that grid.” He also outlined broader reform areas including metering, tariff structures, sector liquidity, gas supply, and electricity market sustainability, acknowledging that some structural challenges would require longer-term interventions.
The ministry’s rebuttal emphasized that “Mr. Tegbe made no such commitment” regarding a three-month fix for grid collapses. Instead, the statement claimed he “stated unequivocally that the timelines are still being worked and subject to diagnostics and stakeholder engagements.” The ministry further noted that initial grid stabilization efforts would commence within the first 100 days, while broader sector reforms could take approximately a year.
Notably, while the ministry’s statement quoted Tegbe’s promise of “visible improvement in the sector,” it omitted his subsequent remark that tied this improvement explicitly to a three-month window: “If you don’t see this in three months, it means you won’t see it in six months.”
This discrepancy suggests the ministry’s clarification presents an incomplete picture of the minister’s original statements. While media headlines claiming Tegbe vowed to “fix grid collapse in three months” may have overstated his exact words, the minister unmistakably created performance expectations within a three-month timeframe and specifically linked grid stabilization to his first 100 days in office.
Nigeria’s electricity sector has long struggled with reliability issues, with grid collapses causing widespread blackouts across the country multiple times annually. These disruptions significantly impact businesses, healthcare facilities, and daily life for Nigeria’s 200+ million citizens.
The controversy highlights the challenges facing Nigeria’s new administration as it attempts to reform the power sector, which remains one of the country’s most critical infrastructure weaknesses despite numerous past intervention attempts and billions in investments over the decades.
As Tegbe begins his tenure, his performance will likely be measured against the very timeline he himself established during his confirmation process, regardless of the ministry’s subsequent attempts to temper public expectations.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Interesting claim about the power minister’s promises. It will be important to see if the ministry can actually deliver on improving the grid within the first 100 days, as that would be a significant achievement given Nigeria’s long-standing electricity challenges.
Yes, the timeline is ambitious but stability of the grid is crucial for economic development. I hope the ministry can make tangible progress, even if the full resolution takes longer.
While I appreciate the ministry trying to manage expectations, the minister’s own statements to the Senate seem to indicate a clear commitment to visible improvements within 100 days. Nigerians will be watching closely to see if he can back up those words with action.
The government’s clarification seems to downplay the minister’s remarks to the Senate. While he may not have explicitly promised to ‘fix grid collapse in 3 months’, the expectation of ‘visible improvement’ in that timeframe is still quite bold. Let’s see if they can deliver.
Agreed, the government’s response feels like some backtracking. The minister raised people’s hopes, so he’ll need to show real progress quickly to maintain credibility.
Nigeria’s power sector has struggled for decades, so significant progress in just 3 months does seem unrealistic. That said, the new minister should at least be able to demonstrate some meaningful initial steps to address the grid issues in that timeframe. Steady, incremental change is better than more broken promises.
It’s good the ministry clarified the minister’s remarks, but the substance of his comments to the Senate still seems to set high expectations for short-term progress. Nigerians have heard promises before, so the real test will be in the actual results delivered.
Nigeria’s electricity woes are long-standing, so any promises to resolve them quickly should be viewed with some skepticism. That said, I’m hopeful the new power minister can at least start to make headway on stabilizing the grid, even if the full fix takes longer.
You make a fair point. Steady, incremental improvements may be more realistic than dramatic 3-month turnarounds. The key is demonstrating real momentum in the right direction.
The power challenges in Nigeria are deeply entrenched, so I’m skeptical that any minister could resolve the grid collapse issue in just 3 months. However, if the new team can at least start to make tangible improvements within that timeframe, that would be a positive sign.