Listen to the article
In the swirl of social media controversy, a manipulated video falsely showing former Ako Bicol Representative Zaldy Co directly accusing President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez of masterminding flood control corruption has gained significant traction online.
The AI-generated video, which has amassed 1.9 million views and thousands of shares since its November 14 posting, depicts Co saying, “Si Romualdez at si bangag ang utak sa lahat ng anomalya sa flood control” — with “bangag” being a derogatory term critics use to refer to President Marcos. The statement translates to: “Romualdez and [Marcos] are the masterminds behind all the anomalies in flood control projects.”
Digital forensic analysis has confirmed the video’s fraudulent nature. AI detection tools Deepware Scanner flagged it with a 99% probability of manipulation according to its Seferbekov model and 63% probability under its Ensemble model. Hive Moderation separately identified the content as 99.2% likely to contain AI-generated or deepfake elements.
While Co has indeed made serious allegations against both officials in authentic videos, he never made the specific statement shown in the manipulated clip. The timing of the fake video’s release coincided with Co’s publication of a three-part “tell-all” series on social media, creating confusion about what statements were genuine.
In his actual videos posted on November 14-16, Co did implicate both Marcos and Romualdez in alleged corruption. His third video claimed the pair received approximately P56 billion in kickbacks from flood control projects, contradicting the P21 billion figure mentioned by the Independent Commission on Infrastructure. He also accused them of orchestrating the insertion of P100 billion worth of projects into the 2025 national budget, with Marcos allegedly receiving P25 billion in kickbacks.
The controversy comes amid shifting political allegiances. Co was previously considered a close ally of Romualdez in Congress before becoming embroiled in corruption allegations himself. On November 18, the Ombudsman filed graft and malversation charges against Co regarding alleged irregularities in a P289.4 million flood control project in Naujan, Oriental Mindoro.
Malacañang has firmly denied Co’s allegations and challenged the former lawmaker, who is currently abroad, to return to the Philippines and make his claims under oath.
The spread of this manipulated video highlights the growing sophistication of AI-generated disinformation in Philippine politics. Many social media users appear to have accepted the fake video as authentic, with commenters expressing support for Co’s supposed direct accusations against the country’s highest officials.
This incident underscores the increasing difficulty in distinguishing between genuine and fabricated political content online, particularly as deepfake technology becomes more accessible and convincing. It also demonstrates how quickly such content can spread, potentially influencing public opinion before fact-checkers can respond.
As political tensions continue to rise around allegations of corruption in government infrastructure projects, media literacy experts warn that citizens must approach viral political content with heightened skepticism and verify information through multiple credible sources.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
It’s disappointing to see how easily disinformation can spread online, especially when powered by sophisticated AI technology. We must continue to invest in digital forensics and fact-checking to expose these kinds of deceptions. The public deserves accurate, trustworthy information.
Well said. Maintaining the integrity of information in the digital age requires ongoing vigilance and a commitment to truth. Fact-based journalism and digital verification will be critical in the fight against AI-enabled misinformation.
I’m glad to see the authorities were able to confirm this video as a fake through digital analysis. It’s important that we hold those responsible for spreading disinformation accountable. Fact-checking is the best defense against the proliferation of these AI-generated falsehoods.
You’re right, responsible fact-checking and exposure of manipulated content is key. We can’t allow bad actors to undermine public trust and sow division through the misuse of technology.
This case highlights the urgent need for better regulation and oversight of AI-powered media manipulation. We cannot allow bad actors to exploit these technologies to erode public trust and sow division. Rigorous fact-checking and accountability measures are essential.
I agree completely. The proliferation of deepfakes and other forms of AI-generated misinformation is a serious threat that requires a multi-faceted response from policymakers, tech companies, and the public. Proactive steps to mitigate these risks are crucial.
This seems like a blatant attempt to spread disinformation through manipulated video. It’s concerning to see AI being used in this way to mislead the public. We need to be vigilant against these kinds of tactics and rely on authoritative and verified sources of information.
Agreed, the use of AI to create false or misleading videos is a real threat to democracy and truth. Fact-checking and digital forensics are crucial to exposing these kinds of deceptive practices.
This is a concerning trend, where AI is being used to create misleading and deceptive content. It’s crucial that we remain vigilant and rely on authoritative and verified sources to discern truth from fiction. We must find ways to better regulate the use of this technology.
I agree, the proliferation of deepfakes and AI-manipulated media poses a real threat to the integrity of information. Stronger regulation and enforcement is needed to combat this growing problem.