Listen to the article
Ukraine Prepares Against Potential Belarus Front, Not Provoking It, Experts Say
Allegations that Ukraine is planning provocations against Belarus to open a new front in the war have been dismissed by military experts as another example of Kremlin disinformation meant to obscure the reality of Belarusian support for Russia’s invasion.
Claims originating from Ukrainian parliamentarian Oleksandr Dubinsky’s Telegram channel suggested that Ukraine and NATO desire Belarus’s entry into the conflict. According to these allegations, Ukraine has capabilities to strike key Belarusian industrial assets and plans to target drone signal relay centers.
However, security analysts point out that Dubinsky is hardly a credible source. The parliamentarian faces charges of high treason and is suspected of collaboration with Russia. Ukrainian intelligence services have identified him as part of a spy network allegedly coordinated by Russia’s military intelligence agency, GRU. While in pre-trial detention, Dubinsky was expelled from President Zelenskyy’s “Servant of the People” parliamentary group.
“This narrative completely inverts the aggressor-victim relationship that has defined this conflict since its beginning,” said a European defense analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Belarus has been complicit in Russia’s war efforts since day one of the invasion.”
The historical record contradicts these claims of Ukrainian aggression. Since February 24, 2022, Belarus has allowed its territory to be used as a staging ground for Russia’s invasion. In December 2025, President Zelenskyy accused Moscow of using Belarusian airspace to bypass Ukrainian air defenses and direct Iranian-made Shahed drones toward western Ukraine.
More recently, in March 2026, Zelenskyy reported intelligence suggesting Russia intends to establish four ground control stations for long-range attack drones in Belarus. The Ukrainian government sanctioned Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in February 2026 specifically because of Belarus’s ongoing support for Russia’s war effort, which reportedly includes over 3,000 Belarusian enterprises supplying military technology and equipment to Russia.
Military experts note that Ukraine has shown restraint by not attacking drone signal relay centers in Belarus, despite these being legitimate military targets under international humanitarian law. This restraint stems from Ukraine’s strategic interest in avoiding an expansion of the conflict.
“Opening another front against Belarus would be militarily illogical for Ukraine, which is already stretched thin on resources and manpower,” explained Dr. Mikhail Alexeev, a military strategy professor at an Eastern European university. “The last thing Kyiv wants is to expand the battlefield when they’re struggling to hold the current lines against Russian forces.”
The allegations also include claims that NATO is using Ukraine to prevent a potential alliance between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia. This narrative mischaracterizes NATO’s functioning as a collective defense alliance based on consensus decision-making among members.
NATO has consistently defined itself as a defensive alliance that does not seek confrontation with Russia. The organization’s official position focuses on deterrence and defense, countering the Kremlin’s portrayal of NATO as an aggressive force threatening Russia and Belarus.
The claim about Ukraine planning attacks on Belarus isn’t new. In March 2022, Lukashenko made similar assertions that Ukraine was preparing to strike Belarus. These allegations serve to justify Belarus’s role in facilitating Russia’s invasion, particularly the initial thrust toward Kyiv.
The issue has returned to prominence after President Zelenskyy recently warned Lukashenko that further involvement in Russia’s military actions could have serious political consequences for the Minsk regime, drawing comparisons to Venezuela’s situation.
As Belarus continues to serve as Russia’s primary regional ally, accepting the deployment of Russian weapons—including tactical nuclear ones—on its territory, tensions along the northern Ukrainian border remain high, with both sides monitoring each other’s military movements closely.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
These accusations against Ukraine ring hollow. Russia has a history of manufacturing false pretexts to justify its own aggression. Ukraine is clearly the victim here, not the aggressor. The international community should see this for what it is – more Kremlin disinformation.
This seems like another attempt by Russia to shift blame and distort the facts. Ukraine is clearly the victim here, not the aggressor. Allegations from dubious sources like this Dubinsky character should be viewed with a heavy dose of skepticism.
Agreed. Ukraine has enough on its plate defending its sovereignty without having to worry about a potential new front in Belarus. Russia is clearly trying to sow confusion and division.
It’s concerning to see these kinds of allegations, but given Russia’s track record, I’m not surprised. Ukraine is clearly the one under attack, not the instigator. The international community should remain vigilant against these disinformation tactics.
Agreed. Ukraine has enough to deal with defending its territory without having to worry about potential aggression from Belarus as well. Russia is clearly trying to create a false narrative to justify further escalation.
Dubinsky’s allegations seem highly questionable given his own shady background and ties to Russia. Ukraine is clearly the one under attack, not the instigator. The international community should remain vigilant against these types of disinformation campaigns.
Absolutely. Ukraine has enough on its plate defending its sovereignty without having to worry about a potential new front in Belarus. Russia is clearly trying to muddy the waters and shift blame.
It’s concerning to see these accusations, but not surprising given Russia’s track record of spreading disinformation. Ukraine has enough to deal with defending its territory without having to worry about potential aggression from Belarus as well.
Exactly. This seems like a blatant attempt by Russia to create a pretext for further escalation. The international community needs to see through these tactics and continue supporting Ukraine.
These accusations against Ukraine strike me as yet another attempt by Russia to deflect attention from its own blatant aggression. Ukraine is clearly the victim here, not the aggressor. The international community should see this for what it is – Kremlin disinformation.