Listen to the article
Former Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar has firmly denied recent reports claiming he has stepped away from active politics, dismissing such allegations as deliberate misinformation designed to create confusion and undermine the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
In a statement issued Monday by the Atiku Media Office in Abuja, the political veteran categorically rejected rumors of his political retirement, emphasizing that he would never communicate such a significant decision through unofficial channels or third-party sources.
“We wish to state, for the record, that information circulating on social media about a purported meeting of His Excellency, Atiku Abubakar, with stakeholders of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), in which the former Vice President allegedly decided to ‘step aside and retire from active politics,’ is entirely false and deliberately misleading,” the statement declared.
The media office clarified that Abubakar has not recently held meetings with ADC stakeholders at the national level, confirming that his only recent engagement was with the party’s representatives in Adamawa State, his home region in northeastern Nigeria.
The statement went further to suggest the rumors were part of a coordinated campaign, potentially sponsored by the current administration. “Only the government and its agents could have sponsored this desperate narrative out of fear of what is coming,” it asserted, characterizing the false reports as bearing “all the hallmarks of a coordinated disinformation campaign.”
Abubakar, who served as Vice President from 1999 to 2007 under President Olusegun Obasanjo, has remained a significant political figure in Nigeria for decades. He has contested for the presidency multiple times, most recently as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the 2023 general elections, where he finished second to current President Bola Tinubu.
His continued presence in Nigerian politics represents a formidable opposition voice, particularly at a time when many citizens are expressing discontent with the current administration’s economic policies amid rising inflation and cost of living challenges.
The former Vice President attributed the fabricated reports to “anti-democratic elements who are deeply unsettled by the growing national consensus to rescue Nigeria from the failures of the current administration.” This statement points to heightened political tensions as opposition forces appear to be consolidating around criticism of the government’s performance since taking office last year.
Political analysts note that such disinformation tactics have become increasingly common in Nigeria’s polarized political landscape, where social media serves as both a valuable communication tool and a vector for misinformation. The incident highlights the challenges of information integrity in Nigeria’s digital political discourse.
The ADC, while not among Nigeria’s largest political parties, has been gaining attention as a potential platform for opposition figures, particularly as realignments occur following the 2023 elections. Any association with a political heavyweight like Abubakar would significantly raise the party’s profile in Nigeria’s competitive political environment.
Abubakar concluded his statement by urging supporters, ADC members, and “all well-meaning Nigerians” to disregard the false reports and “remain focused on the collective effort to rebuild Nigeria,” signaling his intention to continue playing an active role in the country’s political affairs.
The incident occurs against the backdrop of Nigeria’s challenging economic circumstances, with many citizens looking to opposition leaders to provide alternative visions for addressing the nation’s pressing socioeconomic issues. As one of the country’s most experienced political figures, Abubakar’s continued involvement in politics remains significant for Nigeria’s democratic landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


28 Comments
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Production mix shifting toward Disinformation might help margins if metals stay firm.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
Uranium names keep pushing higher—supply still tight into 2026.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
I like the balance sheet here—less leverage than peers.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.