Listen to the article
Taylor Swift has filed three new trademark applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, a move that experts believe aims to protect her voice and image from potential misuse through artificial intelligence technology.
The applications, filed last Friday through Swift’s TAS Rights Management, include two sound trademarks covering her voice—one for the phrase “Hey, it’s Taylor Swift” and another for “Hey, it’s Taylor.” The third application is for a visual trademark described as a photograph of Swift holding a pink guitar with a black strap while wearing a multicolored iridescent bodysuit and silver boots, standing on a pink stage with a multicolored microphone and purple lights in the background.
All three applications have been approved and are now awaiting assignment to an examining attorney, according to patent office records.
The trademark filings were first noticed and publicized by intellectual property attorney Josh Gerben, who suggested in a blog post that Swift’s actions represent a strategic response to growing concerns about AI technology. Gerben noted that while “Right of Publicity” laws offer some protection against unauthorized use of a celebrity’s likeness, trademark filings can provide additional legal safeguards in an era of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence capabilities.
Swift, one of the world’s most recognizable celebrities, has already faced unauthorized AI manipulation of her image. Earlier this year, pornographic deepfake images of the singer circulated widely online, making her perhaps the most high-profile victim of this growing digital threat. In another incident, Swift was depicted in a fake endorsement of former President Donald Trump during his 2024 campaign, which Trump subsequently shared as if it were genuine.
These incidents highlight the increasing vulnerability of public figures to AI-generated content that can be difficult to distinguish from authentic material. For entertainers like Swift, whose voice and image are central to their brand and commercial value, such unauthorized reproductions pose serious legal and financial concerns.
Swift isn’t alone in seeking trademark protections against AI misuse. In January, actor Matthew McConaughey secured eight trademarks from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, including a sound trademark for his catchphrase “Alright, alright, alright.” According to attorneys from entertainment law firm Yorn Levine, which represented McConaughey, these trademarks were filed specifically to protect his voice and likeness from unauthorized AI use while preserving his ability to develop new AI-related opportunities.
Unlike Swift’s defensive posture, McConaughey has embraced some applications of AI technology, making a deal with voice-cloning company ElevenLabs that allows their AI technology to replicate his voice under controlled circumstances.
The entertainment industry is increasingly grappling with the implications of AI technology that can convincingly replicate performers’ voices, images, and mannerisms. These developments have raised significant concerns about consent, compensation, and the potential devaluation of creative work as AI-generated content becomes more sophisticated and widespread.
Legal experts note that current intellectual property frameworks weren’t designed with AI capabilities in mind, leaving celebrities and content creators searching for ways to protect their professional identities using existing legal tools like trademark registrations.
As AI technology continues to advance, the entertainment industry may face pressure to develop new legal frameworks and industry standards that specifically address these challenges, balancing innovation with protection of performers’ rights and creative control.
Representatives for Swift and Rebecca Liebowitz, the partner at law firm Venable listed as the attorney on the filings, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the trademark applications.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
Swift’s proactive approach to safeguarding her brand from AI-driven misuse is a smart business move. As technology continues to advance, more celebrities may follow suit to defend their intellectual property rights.
This story highlights the ongoing tension between technological progress and the need to protect individual privacy and creative rights.
While I understand Swift’s concerns about AI misuse, I wonder if these trademark applications go too far in restricting the use of common phrases and visual representations. There may be a balance to strike between protecting intellectual property and preserving fair use and parody rights.
It’s a complex issue that will likely require ongoing legal and regulatory discussions to ensure the rights of both celebrities and the public are adequately addressed.
I’m curious to see how these trademark applications will play out. The ability to control the commercial use of one’s voice and image is becoming increasingly important in the digital age, so Swift’s actions highlight an important issue for the entertainment industry.
It will be interesting to monitor how this story develops and whether other celebrities follow suit in seeking to protect their identities from potential AI-driven misuse.
From a business perspective, Swift’s trademark filings make sense as a proactive measure to safeguard her brand and revenue streams. As AI becomes more sophisticated, the need for celebrities to defend their intellectual property will only grow.
It will be intriguing to see if this sets a precedent for other high-profile artists to take similar steps in the future.
It’s interesting to see Taylor Swift taking proactive steps to protect her voice and image from potential misuse through AI. As AI technology continues to advance, it’s understandable that celebrities would want to ensure their intellectual property rights are safeguarded.
Trademark protection is a smart move, especially for high-profile artists like Swift who could be vulnerable to AI-generated impersonations or unauthorized use of their likeness.
As an artist, I can understand Swift’s desire to maintain control over the commercial use of her voice and image. However, I hope these trademark filings don’t set a precedent that overly restricts creative expression and parody.
It will be important to find the right balance between protecting intellectual property and preserving the free flow of ideas and artistic expression.
While I applaud Swift’s efforts to protect her voice and image, I hope these trademark applications don’t set a precedent that stifles creative expression or unduly limits the public’s ability to engage with and comment on public figures.
It’s a complex issue that will require thoughtful legal and policy discussions to ensure a fair balance between individual rights and the public good.
The impact of AI on the entertainment industry is a fascinating topic. Swift’s trademark applications highlight the complex challenges that arise as technology continues to evolve and disrupt traditional business models.
I’m curious to hear legal experts’ perspectives on the extent to which celebrities can legitimately protect their voices and likenesses from AI-driven uses.